Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Parent, I.: Serials standards in convergence : ISBD(S) developments (2000) 0.01 
    0.014111667 = product of:
  0.028223334 = sum of:
    0.028223334 = product of:
      0.08467 = sum of:
        0.08467 = weight(_text_:i in 5411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08467 = score(doc=5411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 5411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5411)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. Seymour, C.: ¬A time to build : Israeli cataloging in transition (2000) 0.01 
    0.01376995 = product of:
  0.0275399 = sum of:
    0.0275399 = product of:
      0.0826197 = sum of:
        0.0826197 = weight(_text_:c in 5412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0826197 = score(doc=5412,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 5412, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5412)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Wiesenmüller, H.: Drei Minuten RDA: Filme (2015) 0.01 
    0.009407777 = product of:
  0.018815555 = sum of:
    0.018815555 = product of:
      0.056446664 = sum of:
        0.056446664 = weight(_text_:i in 1775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056446664 = score(doc=1775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 1775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1775)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Jüngst bin ich gefragt worden, wer denn eigentlich der geistige Schöpfer eines Films sei - der Regisseur vielleicht? Oder der Drehbuchschreiber? Tatsächlich geht RDA nur in seltenen Fällen davon aus, dass man bei Filmen einen geistigen Schöpfer im normalen Sinn identifizieren kann. Das ist dann der Fall, wenn eine Person praktisch im Alleingang für den gesamten Film verantwortlich ist. Dann wird die Beziehungskennzeichnung "Filmemacher" aus Anhang I.2.1 vergeben. Bei normalen Bibliotheksmaterialien dürften derartige Produktionen nur höchst selten vorkommen, aber auf Youtube findet man sicher zahllose Beispiele dafür. ...
  4. Buttò, S.: RDA: analyses, considerations and activities by the Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian Libraries and Bibliographic Information (ICCU) (2016) 0.01 
    0.00831538 = product of:
  0.01663076 = sum of:
    0.01663076 = product of:
      0.049892277 = sum of:
        0.049892277 = weight(_text_:i in 2958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049892277 = score(doc=2958,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 2958, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2958)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    i
    Location
    I
  5. Koster, L.: Persistent identifiers for heritage objects (2020) 0.01 
    0.00831538 = product of:
  0.01663076 = sum of:
    0.01663076 = product of:
      0.049892277 = sum of:
        0.049892277 = weight(_text_:i in 5718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049892277 = score(doc=5718,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 5718, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5718)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Persistent identifiers (PID's) are essential for getting access and referring to library, archive and museum (LAM) collection objects in a sustainable and unambiguous way, both internally and externally. Heritage institutions need a universal policy for the use of PID's in order to have an efficient digital infrastructure at their disposal and to achieve optimal interoperability, leading to open data, open collections and efficient resource management. Here the discussion is limited to PID's that institutions can assign to objects they own or administer themselves. PID's for people, subjects etc. can be used by heritage institutions, but are generally managed by other parties. The first part of this article consists of a general theoretical description of persistent identifiers. First of all, I discuss the questions of what persistent identifiers are and what they are not, and what is needed to administer and use them. The most commonly used existing PID systems are briefly characterized. Then I discuss the types of objects PID's can be assigned to. This section concludes with an overview of the requirements that apply if PIDs should also be used for linked data. The second part examines current infrastructural practices, and existing PID systems and their advantages and shortcomings. Based on these practical issues and the pros and cons of existing PID systems a list of requirements for PID systems is presented which is used to address a number of practical considerations. This section concludes with a number of recommendations.
  6. Valacchi, F.: Things in the World : the integration process of archival descriptions in intercultural systems (2016) 0.01 
    0.008231806 = product of:
  0.016463611 = sum of:
    0.016463611 = product of:
      0.049390834 = sum of:
        0.049390834 = weight(_text_:i in 2957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049390834 = score(doc=2957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2957)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    i
  7. Hengel-Dittrich, C.: FRANAR: Functional Requirements for Authority Records (2004) 0.01 
    0.007868543 = product of:
  0.015737087 = sum of:
    0.015737087 = product of:
      0.04721126 = sum of:
        0.04721126 = weight(_text_:c in 2485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04721126 = score(doc=2485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 2485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2485)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬The international diffusion of RDA : a wide overview on the new guidelines (2016) 0.01 
    0.007868543 = product of:
  0.015737087 = sum of:
    0.015737087 = product of:
      0.04721126 = sum of:
        0.04721126 = weight(_text_:c in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04721126 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Petrucciani, A.: RDA: a critical analysis based on cataloguing theory and practice (2016) 0.01 
    0.0070558335 = product of:
  0.014111667 = sum of:
    0.014111667 = product of:
      0.042335 = sum of:
        0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042335 = score(doc=2950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    i
  10. Belpassi, E.: ¬The application software RIMMF : RDA thinking in action (2016) 0.01 
    0.0070558335 = product of:
  0.014111667 = sum of:
    0.014111667 = product of:
      0.042335 = sum of:
        0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042335 = score(doc=2959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    i
  11. McGrath, K.; Kules, B.; Fitzpatrick, C.: FRBR and facets provide flexible, work-centric access to items in library collections (2011) 0.01 
    0.006884975 = product of:
  0.01376995 = sum of:
    0.01376995 = product of:
      0.04130985 = sum of:
        0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04130985 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016) 0.01 
    0.006082151 = product of:
  0.012164302 = sum of:
    0.012164302 = product of:
      0.036492907 = sum of:
        0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036492907 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 5.2016 19:22:40
  13. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: RDA: a content standard to ensure the quality of data : history of a relationship (2016) 0.01 
    0.0059014075 = product of:
  0.011802815 = sum of:
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.035408445 = sum of:
        0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 2948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035408445 = score(doc=2948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2948)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Behrens, R.; Aliverti, C.; Schaffner, V.: RDA in Germany, Austria and German-speaking Switzerland : a new standard not only for libraries (2016) 0.01 
    0.0059014075 = product of:
  0.011802815 = sum of:
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.035408445 = sum of:
        0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035408445 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Fuchs, C.; Pampel, H.; Vierkant, P.: ORCID in Deutschland : Ergebnisse einer Bestandsaufnahme im Jahr 2016 (2017) 0.01 
    0.0059014075 = product of:
  0.011802815 = sum of:
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.035408445 = sum of:
        0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035408445 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Galeffi, A.; Sardo, A.L.: Cataloguing, a necessary evil : critical aspects of RDA (2016) 0.01 
    0.0058798613 = product of:
  0.011759723 = sum of:
    0.011759723 = product of:
      0.035279166 = sum of:
        0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035279166 = score(doc=2952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    i
  17. Harlow, C.: Data munging tools in Preparation for RDF : Catmandu and LODRefine (2015) 0.00 
    0.0049178395 = product of:
  0.009835679 = sum of:
    0.009835679 = product of:
      0.029507035 = sum of:
        0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029507035 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017) 0.00 
    0.0049178395 = product of:
  0.009835679 = sum of:
    0.009835679 = product of:
      0.029507035 = sum of:
        0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029507035 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. Eversberg, B.: Zum Thema "Migration" - Beispiel USA (2018) 0.00 
    0.0049178395 = product of:
  0.009835679 = sum of:
    0.009835679 = product of:
      0.029507035 = sum of:
        0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 4386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029507035 = score(doc=4386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4386)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Wir leiden an einer bedauerlichen Knappheit von Information über die Marktlage und Erfahrungen bei den bibliothekarischen DV-Systemen. Das ist jenseits des "Teiches" anders: Jedes Jahr veröffentlicht der Konsultant Marshall Breeding eine umfangreiche Marktübersicht und hält auf seiner Website eine Menge andere Berichte und interessante Übersichten bereit, z.B. "Migration Reports": https://librarytechnology.org/Library Technology Guides. Da sieht man in Tabellen, z.B. auch für Koha, wieviele Anwender von welchen Systemen insgesamt schon zu Koha gewandert sind, die Gesamtzahl ist 3.547! Zu Alma dagegen nur 1151, zu WMS 464, zu Aleph 1036. ("allegro-C" ist nicht dabei, aber es gab ja auch nie irgendwelche Anwender in USA, außer Goethe-Institute, aber die sind wohl nicht erfaßt.) Breedings neueste Marktübersicht für 2018 ist im Journal "American Libraries" veröffentlicht: https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2018/05/01/library-systems-report-2018/
  20. Danskin, A.: "Tomorrow never knows" : the end of cataloguing? (2006) 0.00 
    0.0047038887 = product of:
  0.009407777 = sum of:
    0.009407777 = product of:
      0.028223332 = sum of:
        0.028223332 = weight(_text_:i in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028223332 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to review the challenges confronting cataloguing as we have known it and to consider how these challenges might be confronted and whether they may be surmounted. The main focus of this paper is on cataloguing rather than the catalogue, although it is obviously difficult to separate one from the other. First of all, what does "cataloguing" mean? For the purposes of this paper I have adopted a broad definition incorporating the following activities: - description of the resource sufficient for purposes of identification and for differentiation from other similar resources - identification and control of access points - identification and control of relationships with other resources - subject analysis of the resource - assignment of subject indexing terms - assignment of classification numbers The challenges facing cataloguing are all too well known. In no particular order, the major challenges are: - Increasing inputs - New kinds of information resource - Competition from other mediation services. - Perception that cataloguing is high cost and offers poor value for money. - Fiscal constraints - Declining workforce This is a daunting list. We have a choice, we could, to paraphrase John Lennon, "Turn off our minds, relax and float down stream", until we retire, take voluntary redundancy, or retrain as marketing consultants; or, we can choose to confront these challenges and consider what they really mean for cataloguing.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes