Search (89 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012) 0.05
    0.04711891 = product of:
      0.09423782 = sum of:
        0.09423782 = product of:
          0.14135672 = sum of:
            0.09878167 = weight(_text_:i in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09878167 = score(doc=2546,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
            0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042575058 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Bianchini, C.; Zappalà, P.: ISBD and mechanical musical devices : a case study of the Department of Musicology and Cultural Heritage, University of Pavia, Italy (2014) 0.03
    0.030233562 = product of:
      0.060467124 = sum of:
        0.060467124 = product of:
          0.090700686 = sum of:
            0.049390834 = weight(_text_:i in 2002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049390834 = score(doc=2002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2002)
            0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 2002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04130985 = score(doc=2002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2002)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Location
    I
  3. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.03
    0.027961638 = product of:
      0.055923276 = sum of:
        0.055923276 = product of:
          0.08388491 = sum of:
            0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04130985 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
            0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042575058 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011) 0.03
    0.027961638 = product of:
      0.055923276 = sum of:
        0.055923276 = product of:
          0.08388491 = sum of:
            0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04130985 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
            0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042575058 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Maxwell, R.L.: Handbook for RDA : Maxwell's handbook for RDA ; explaining and illustrating RDA: resource description and access using MARC 21 (2013) 0.03
    0.02591448 = product of:
      0.05182896 = sum of:
        0.05182896 = product of:
          0.07774344 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=2085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=2085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    IntroductionDescribing manifestations and items -- Describing persons -- Describing families -- Describing corporate bodies -- Describing geographic entities -- Describing works -- Describing expressions -- Recording relationships -- Appendix A. Printed books and sheets -- Appendix B. Cartographic resources -- Appendix C. Unpublished manuscripts and manuscript collections -- Appendix D. Notated music -- Appendix E. Audio recordings -- Appendix F. Moving image resources -- Appendix G. Two-dimensional graphic resources -- Appendix H. Three-dimensional resources and objects -- Appendix I. Digital resources -- Appendix J. Microform resources -- Appendix K. Bibliographic records serials and integrating resources -- Appendix L. Analytical description.
  6. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.02
    0.023967117 = product of:
      0.047934234 = sum of:
        0.047934234 = product of:
          0.07190135 = sum of:
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
            0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036492907 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52
  7. DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works (2011) 0.02
    0.023967117 = product of:
      0.047934234 = sum of:
        0.047934234 = product of:
          0.07190135 = sum of:
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
            0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036492907 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Coyle, K.: FRBR, before and after : a look at our bibliographic models (2016) 0.02
    0.021896642 = product of:
      0.043793283 = sum of:
        0.043793283 = product of:
          0.06568992 = sum of:
            0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035279166 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
            0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030410757 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Part I. Work, model, technologyThe work -- The model -- The technology -- Part II. FRBR and other solutions -- Introduction -- FRBR : standard for international sharing -- The entity-relation model -- What is modeled in FRBR -- Does FRBR meet FRBR's objectives? -- Some issues that arise -- Bibliographic description and the Semantic Web.
    Date
    12. 2.2016 16:22:58
  9. Ginther, C.; Schuh, S.: Redefining bibliographical standards (2015) 0.02
    0.017035898 = product of:
      0.034071796 = sum of:
        0.034071796 = product of:
          0.10221538 = sum of:
            0.10221538 = weight(_text_:c in 2989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10221538 = score(doc=2989,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.6601002 = fieldWeight in 2989, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2989)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  10. Gorman, M.: ¬The origins and making of the ISBD : a personal history, 1966-1978 (2014) 0.02
    0.016463611 = product of:
      0.032927223 = sum of:
        0.032927223 = product of:
          0.09878167 = sum of:
            0.09878167 = weight(_text_:i in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09878167 = score(doc=1995,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    What follows are my memories of the events, starting almost five decades ago, that led to the International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD)-still the most successful and widely used international cataloging standard in history. Many of the documents of the time were little more than ephemera (working papers and the like) and some are not now available to me. I have checked my recollections in all the documents to which I have access and apologize in advance for any errors of time or place. I also apologize for the, alas, unavoidable, given the nature of the essay, many repetitions of the words "I" and "me."
  11. Maxwell, R.L.: Maxwell's handbook for RDA : explaining and illustrating RDA, Resource description and access, using MARC 21 (2014) 0.02
    0.015116781 = product of:
      0.030233562 = sum of:
        0.030233562 = product of:
          0.045350343 = sum of:
            0.024695417 = weight(_text_:i in 1618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024695417 = score(doc=1618,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.14585242 = fieldWeight in 1618, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1618)
            0.020654924 = weight(_text_:c in 1618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020654924 = score(doc=1618,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1618, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1618)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction 2. Describing Manifestations and Items 3. Describing Persons 4. Describing Families 5. Describing Corporate Bodies 6. Describing Geographic Entities 7. Describing Works 8. Describing Expressions 9. Recording Relationships Appendix A. Printed Books and Sheets Appendix B. Cartographic Resources Appendix C. Unpublished Manuscripts and Manuscript Collections Appendix D. Notated Music Appendix E. Audio Recordings Appendix F. Moving Image Resources Appendix G. Two-dimensional Graphic Resources Appendix H. Three-dimensional Resources and Objects Appendix I. Digital Resources Appendix J. Microform Resources Appendix K. Serials and Integrating Resources Appendix L. Analytical Description.
  12. Pauman Budanovi, M.; Zumer, M.: Investigating mental models of cataloguers as the first step towards the development of intuitive cataloguer's tools (2015) 0.01
    0.0139097525 = product of:
      0.027819505 = sum of:
        0.027819505 = product of:
          0.08345851 = sum of:
            0.08345851 = weight(_text_:c in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08345851 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.5389696 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  13. Michetti, G.: Unneutrality of archival standards and processes (2015) 0.01
    0.0139097525 = product of:
      0.027819505 = sum of:
        0.027819505 = product of:
          0.08345851 = sum of:
            0.08345851 = weight(_text_:c in 2990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08345851 = score(doc=2990,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.5389696 = fieldWeight in 2990, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2990)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  14. Vukadin, A.: Bibliographic modelling of transmedia (2015) 0.01
    0.0139097525 = product of:
      0.027819505 = sum of:
        0.027819505 = product of:
          0.08345851 = sum of:
            0.08345851 = weight(_text_:c in 2997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08345851 = score(doc=2997,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.5389696 = fieldWeight in 2997, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  15. Conradt, V.; Hänger, C.; Klein, A.: ¬Die Anbindung von Alma an den SWB-Verbund am Beispiel der UB Mannheim (2016) 0.01
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.02360563 = sum of:
        0.02360563 = product of:
          0.07081689 = sum of:
            0.07081689 = weight(_text_:c in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07081689 = score(doc=2312,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Hüning, C.; Jansen, H.; Kauke, V.; Roschanski, J.; Schackmann, E.; Schomburg, S.; Selbach, M.: ¬Der Umstieg auf die neuen Bibliothekssysteme : Herausforderungen am Beispiel der FH Münster und des hbz-Verbundes (2016) 0.01
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.02360563 = sum of:
        0.02360563 = product of:
          0.07081689 = sum of:
            0.07081689 = weight(_text_:c in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07081689 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Polidoro, P.: Using qualitative methods to analyze online catalog interfaces (2015) 0.01
    0.011641531 = product of:
      0.023283063 = sum of:
        0.023283063 = product of:
          0.069849186 = sum of:
            0.069849186 = weight(_text_:i in 1879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069849186 = score(doc=1879,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 1879, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1879)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Many experts have proposed an evolution toward "next generation catalogs," whose main features are partly inspired by commercial websites such as Google or Amazon. This article examines pros and cons of this integration. It also aims to show how a qualitative approach helps to broaden understanding of web communication mechanisms. After discussing some examples of "next generation catalog" features, I analyze the interface of an online catalog responding to different users' information needs and seeking behaviors. In the conclusion I suggest that the right approach to integration is a "translation" (not a "copy and paste") between commercial and library logics.
  18. Forassiepi, S.: ISBD and REICAT : a relationship between past, present, and future (2014) 0.01
    0.011641531 = product of:
      0.023283063 = sum of:
        0.023283063 = product of:
          0.069849186 = sum of:
            0.069849186 = weight(_text_:i in 2001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069849186 = score(doc=2001,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 2001, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2001)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries are faced with an epochal transformation: the emergence of a new structure of the web, the Semantic Web. The data structure will change completely in the next few years, leading to profound changes in information organization and retrieval. In this article I compare International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) and Regole italiane di catalogazione (REICAT), the new Italian cataloging rules, to see when confronted with this phenomenon, how ready they are to structure bibliographic data in new ways to support information retrieval.
    Location
    I
  19. Beiler, C.; Gratzl, P.; Schubert, B.; Steiner, C.; Steltzer, R.: Erschliessungsarbeit nn Alma : Erfahrungen aus dem OBV vor, während und nach der Aleph-Ablöse (2018) 0.01
    0.011127802 = product of:
      0.022255603 = sum of:
        0.022255603 = product of:
          0.066766806 = sum of:
            0.066766806 = weight(_text_:c in 4662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.066766806 = score(doc=4662,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.43117565 = fieldWeight in 4662, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4662)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Manzanos, N.: Item, document, carrier : an object oriented approach (2012) 0.01
    0.0099784555 = product of:
      0.019956911 = sum of:
        0.019956911 = product of:
          0.05987073 = sum of:
            0.05987073 = weight(_text_:i in 1912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05987073 = score(doc=1912,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 1912, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1912)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    I discuss the concept of Item as stated by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) in the conceptual model Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the object-oriented version of it (FRBRoo). Using object-oriented modeling techniques I analyze the relationship of the Item with the Manifestation entity, the concept of Document, and the physical object as a Carrier of a Content. A class scheme is proposed, not only as an implementation example, but as a way of clarifying some bibliographic concepts as well.We discusses the concept of Item as stated by IFLA in the conceptual model FRBR and the object oriented version of it (FRBRoo). Using object oriented modelling techniques we analize the relationship of the Item with the Manifestation entity, the concept of Document and the physical object as a Carrier of a Content. A class scheme is proposed, not only as an implementation example, but as a way of clarify some bibliographic concepts as well.

Languages

  • e 69
  • d 12
  • i 5
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 81
  • el 17
  • b 4
  • m 4
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…