Search (77 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.01
    0.012164302 = product of:
      0.024328604 = sum of:
        0.024328604 = product of:
          0.07298581 = sum of:
            0.07298581 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07298581 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  2. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 3: facets (2017) 0.01
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.02360563 = sum of:
        0.02360563 = product of:
          0.07081689 = sum of:
            0.07081689 = weight(_text_:c in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07081689 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Oeser, E.: ¬The two systems of knowledge organization : on the characteristics and foundations of a universal background system (1982) 0.01
    0.011759723 = product of:
      0.023519445 = sum of:
        0.023519445 = product of:
          0.07055833 = sum of:
            0.07055833 = weight(_text_:i in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07055833 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Universal classification II: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  4. Cheti, A.: ¬Le categorie nell'indicizzazione (1990) 0.01
    0.009407777 = product of:
      0.018815555 = sum of:
        0.018815555 = product of:
          0.056446664 = sum of:
            0.056446664 = weight(_text_:i in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056446664 = score(doc=3527,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    i
  5. Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996) 0.01
    0.009407777 = product of:
      0.018815555 = sum of:
        0.018815555 = product of:
          0.056446664 = sum of:
            0.056446664 = weight(_text_:i in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056446664 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    i
  6. Tennis, J.T.: Never facets alone : the evolving thought and persistent problems in Ranganathan's theories of classification (2017) 0.01
    0.00831538 = product of:
      0.01663076 = sum of:
        0.01663076 = product of:
          0.049892277 = sum of:
            0.049892277 = weight(_text_:i in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049892277 = score(doc=5800,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan's theory of classification spans a number of works over a number of decades. And while he was devoted to solving many problems in the practice of librarianship, and is known as the father of library science in India (Garfield, 1984), his work in classification revolves around one central concern. His classification research addressed the problems that arose from introducing new ideas into a scheme for classification, while maintaining a meaningful hierarchical and systematically arranged order of classes. This is because hierarchical and systematically arranged classes are the defining characteristic of useful classification. To lose this order is to through the addition of new classes is to introduce confusion, if not chaos, and to move toward a useless classification - or at least one that requires complete revision. In the following chapter, I outline the stages, and the elements of those stages, in Ranganathan's thought on classification from 1926-1972, as well as posthumous work that continues his agenda. And while facets figure prominently in all of these stages; but for Ranganathan to achieve his goal, he must continually add to this central feature of his theory of classification. I will close this chapter with an outline of persistent problems that represent research fronts for the field. Chief among these are what to do about scheme change and the open question about the rigor of information modeling in light of semantic web developments.
  7. Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995) 0.01
    0.008231806 = product of:
      0.016463611 = sum of:
        0.016463611 = product of:
          0.049390834 = sum of:
            0.049390834 = weight(_text_:i in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049390834 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    i
  8. Ullah, A.; Khusro, S.; Ullah, I.: Bibliographic classification in the digital age : current trends & future directions (2017) 0.01
    0.008231806 = product of:
      0.016463611 = sum of:
        0.016463611 = product of:
          0.049390834 = sum of:
            0.049390834 = weight(_text_:i in 5717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049390834 = score(doc=5717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 5717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5717)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.008109535 = product of:
      0.01621907 = sum of:
        0.01621907 = product of:
          0.04865721 = sum of:
            0.04865721 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04865721 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  10. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.008109535 = product of:
      0.01621907 = sum of:
        0.01621907 = product of:
          0.04865721 = sum of:
            0.04865721 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04865721 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  11. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.01
    0.008109535 = product of:
      0.01621907 = sum of:
        0.01621907 = product of:
          0.04865721 = sum of:
            0.04865721 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04865721 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  12. Zins, C.: Knowledge organization : an epistemological perspective (2004) 0.01
    0.007868543 = product of:
      0.015737087 = sum of:
        0.015737087 = product of:
          0.04721126 = sum of:
            0.04721126 = weight(_text_:c in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04721126 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Gnoli, C.; Ledl, A.; Park, Z.; Trzmielewski, M.: Phenomenon-based vs. disciplinary classification : possibilities for evaluating and for mapping (2018) 0.01
    0.007868543 = product of:
      0.015737087 = sum of:
        0.015737087 = product of:
          0.04721126 = sum of:
            0.04721126 = weight(_text_:c in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04721126 = score(doc=4804,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Denton, W.: Putting facets on the Web : an annotated bibliography (2003) 0.01
    0.0072013303 = product of:
      0.014402661 = sum of:
        0.014402661 = product of:
          0.04320798 = sum of:
            0.04320798 = weight(_text_:i in 2467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04320798 = score(doc=2467,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25518858 = fieldWeight in 2467, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2467)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This is a classified, annotated bibliography about how to design faceted classification systems and make them usable on the World Wide Web. It is the first of three works I will be doing. The second, based on the material here and elsewhere, will discuss how to actually make the faceted system and put it online. The third will be a report of how I did just that, what worked, what didn't, and what I learned. Almost every article or book listed here begins with an explanation of what a faceted classification system is, so I won't (but see Steckel in Background below if you don't already know). They all agree that faceted systems are very appropriate for the web. Even pre-web articles (such as Duncan's in Background, below) assert that hypertext and facets will go together well. Combined, it is possible to take a set of documents and classify them or apply subject headings to describe what they are about, then build a navigational structure so that any user, no matter how he or she approaches the material, no matter what his or her goals, can move and search in a way that makes sense to them, but still get to the same useful results as someone else following a different path to the same goal. There is no one way that everyone will always use when looking for information. The more flexible the organization of the information, the more accommodating it is. Facets are more flexible for hypertext browsing than any enumerative or hierarchical system.
    This bibliography is not meant to be exhaustive, but unfortunately it is not as complete as I wanted. Some books and articles are not be included, but they may be used in my future work. (These include two books and one article by B.C. Vickery: Faceted Classification Schemes (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, 1966), Classification and Indexing in Science, 3rd ed. (London: Butterworths, 1975), and "Knowledge Representation: A Brief Review" (Journal of Documentation 42 no. 3 (September 1986): 145-159; and A.C. Foskett's "The Future of Faceted Classification" in The Future of Classification, edited by Rita Marcella and Arthur Maltby (Aldershot, England: Gower, 2000): 69-80). Nevertheless, I hope this bibliography will be useful for those both new to or familiar with faceted hypertext systems. Some very basic resources are listed, as well as some very advanced ones. Some example web sites are mentioned, but there is no detailed technical discussion of any software. The user interface to any web site is extremely important, and this is briefly mentioned in two or three places (for example the discussion of lawforwa.org (see Example Web Sites)). The larger question of how to display information graphically and with hypertext is outside the scope of this bibliography. There are five sections: Recommended, Background, Not Relevant, Example Web Sites, and Mailing Lists. Background material is either introductory, advanced, or of peripheral interest, and can be read after the Recommended resources if the reader wants to know more. The Not Relevant category contains articles that may appear in bibliographies but are not relevant for my purposes.
  15. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.007095843 = product of:
      0.014191686 = sum of:
        0.014191686 = product of:
          0.042575058 = sum of:
            0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042575058 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  16. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01
    0.007095843 = product of:
      0.014191686 = sum of:
        0.014191686 = product of:
          0.042575058 = sum of:
            0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042575058 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.007095843 = product of:
      0.014191686 = sum of:
        0.014191686 = product of:
          0.042575058 = sum of:
            0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042575058 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
  18. Dahlberg, I.: DIN 32705: the German standard on classification systems : a critical appraisal (1992) 0.01
    0.0070558335 = product of:
      0.014111667 = sum of:
        0.014111667 = product of:
          0.042335 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 2669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=2669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Perreault, J.: Categories and relators : a new schema (1994) 0.01
    0.0070558335 = product of:
      0.014111667 = sum of:
        0.014111667 = product of:
          0.042335 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=8863,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the works of Aristotle, Ramon Lull, I. Kant and the experiences with relationships published in the works of S.R. Ranganathan, E.de Grolier, J. Mills, J.C. Costello, E. Wall, R. Pagès, A. Leroy, P. Braffort, M. Kervégant, J.C. Gardin and J. Farradane, categories and relationships were collected, analyzed, grouped and classified in a triadic way so that a scheme resulted by which 120 relationships could be defined and identified by their positions and their codes. The exercise was meant to create and supply a tool for the replacement of the non-significant relation symbol, the colon, in the UDC by a letter code which could express the actual relationship contained in a classificatory statement. Examples for their application illustrate different cases occuring
  20. Dahlberg, I.: Classification structure principles : Investigations, experiences, conclusions (1998) 0.01
    0.0070558335 = product of:
      0.014111667 = sum of:
        0.014111667 = product of:
          0.042335 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=47,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Years

Languages

  • e 65
  • d 4
  • i 4
  • f 3
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 65
  • m 8
  • el 3
  • s 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…