-
Cole, C.: Intelligent information retrieval: diagnosing information need : Part I: the theoretical framework for developing an intelligent IR tool (1998)
0.05
0.05182896 = product of:
0.10365792 = sum of:
0.10365792 = product of:
0.15548688 = sum of:
0.08467 = weight(_text_:i in 6431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08467 = score(doc=6431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 6431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6431)
0.07081689 = weight(_text_:c in 6431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07081689 = score(doc=6431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 6431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6431)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998)
0.04
0.03804194 = product of:
0.07608388 = sum of:
0.07608388 = product of:
0.11412582 = sum of:
0.071550764 = weight(_text_:c in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071550764 = score(doc=1319,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.46207014 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042575058 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992)
0.03
0.03195616 = product of:
0.06391232 = sum of:
0.06391232 = product of:
0.09586847 = sum of:
0.04721126 = weight(_text_:c in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04721126 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.04865721 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04865721 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 5.1999 15:22:48
-
Biskri, I.; Rompré, L.: Using association rules for query reformulation (2012)
0.03
0.02591448 = product of:
0.05182896 = sum of:
0.05182896 = product of:
0.07774344 = sum of:
0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042335 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
-
Habernal, I.; Konopík, M.; Rohlík, O.: Question answering (2012)
0.03
0.02591448 = product of:
0.05182896 = sum of:
0.05182896 = product of:
0.07774344 = sum of:
0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042335 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
-
Cheng, C.-S.; Chung, C.-P.; Shann, J.J.-J.: Fast query evaluation through document identifier assignment for inverted file-based information retrieval systems (2006)
0.03
0.025669476 = product of:
0.051338952 = sum of:
0.051338952 = product of:
0.077008426 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=979,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 979, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=979)
0.041729257 = weight(_text_:c in 979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041729257 = score(doc=979,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 979, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=979)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Compressing an inverted file can greatly improve query performance of an information retrieval system (IRS) by reducing disk I/Os. We observe that a good document identifier assignment (DIA) can make the document identifiers in the posting lists more clustered, and result in better compression as well as shorter query processing time. In this paper, we tackle the NP-complete problem of finding an optimal DIA to minimize the average query processing time in an IRS when the probability distribution of query terms is given. We indicate that the greedy nearest neighbor (Greedy-NN) algorithm can provide excellent performance for this problem. However, the Greedy-NN algorithm is inappropriate if used in large-scale IRSs, due to its high complexity O(N2 × n), where N denotes the number of documents and n denotes the number of distinct terms. In real-world IRSs, the distribution of query terms is skewed. Based on this fact, we propose a fast O(N × n) heuristic, called partition-based document identifier assignment (PBDIA) algorithm, which can efficiently assign consecutive document identifiers to those documents containing frequently used query terms, and improve compression efficiency of the posting lists for those terms. This can result in reduced query processing time. The experimental results show that the PBDIA algorithm can yield a competitive performance versus the Greedy-NN for the DIA problem, and that this optimization problem has significant advantages for both long queries and parallel information retrieval (IR).
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006)
0.02
0.024046673 = product of:
0.048093345 = sum of:
0.048093345 = product of:
0.072140016 = sum of:
0.041729257 = weight(_text_:c in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041729257 = score(doc=56,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030410757 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:32:43
-
Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004)
0.02
0.023967117 = product of:
0.047934234 = sum of:
0.047934234 = product of:
0.07190135 = sum of:
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2008 16:22:48
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.02
0.01621907 = product of:
0.03243814 = sum of:
0.03243814 = product of:
0.09731442 = sum of:
0.09731442 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09731442 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Parallel text search methods (1988)
0.02
0.015737087 = product of:
0.031474173 = sum of:
0.031474173 = product of:
0.09442252 = sum of:
0.09442252 = weight(_text_:c in 404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09442252 = score(doc=404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=404)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.01
0.014191686 = product of:
0.028383372 = sum of:
0.028383372 = product of:
0.085150115 = sum of:
0.085150115 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085150115 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.01
0.014191686 = product of:
0.028383372 = sum of:
0.028383372 = product of:
0.085150115 = sum of:
0.085150115 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085150115 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Daniowicz, C.; Baliski, J.: Document ranking based upon Markov chains (2001)
0.01
0.01376995 = product of:
0.0275399 = sum of:
0.0275399 = product of:
0.0826197 = sum of:
0.0826197 = weight(_text_:c in 5388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0826197 = score(doc=5388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 5388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5388)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wills, R.S.: Google's PageRank : the math behind the search engine (2006)
0.01
0.013304608 = product of:
0.026609216 = sum of:
0.026609216 = product of:
0.079827644 = sum of:
0.079827644 = weight(_text_:i in 5954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079827644 = score(doc=5954,freq=16.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.4714662 = fieldWeight in 5954, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5954)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Approximately 91 million American adults use the Internet on a typical day The number-one Internet activity is reading and writing e-mail. Search engine use is next in line and continues to increase in popularity. In fact, survey findings indicate that nearly 60 million American adults use search engines on a given day. Even though there are many Internet search engines, Google, Yahoo!, and MSN receive over 81% of all search requests. Despite claims that the quality of search provided by Yahoo! and MSN now equals that of Google, Google continues to thrive as the search engine of choice, receiving over 46% of all search requests, nearly double the volume of Yahoo! and over four times that of MSN. I use Google's search engine on a daily basis and rarely request information from other search engines. One day, I decided to visit the homepages of Google. Yahoo!, and MSN to compare the quality of search results. Coffee was on my mind that day, so I entered the simple query "coffee" in the search box at each homepage. Table 1 shows the top ten (unsponsored) results returned by each search engine. Although ordered differently, two webpages, www.peets.com and www.coffeegeek.com, appear in all three top ten lists. In addition, each pairing of top ten lists has two additional results in common. Depending on the information I hoped to obtain about coffee by using the search engines, I could argue that any one of the three returned better results: however, I was not looking for a particular webpage, so all three listings of search results seemed of equal quality. Thus, I plan to continue using Google. My decision is indicative of the problem Yahoo!, MSN, and other search engine companies face in the quest to obtain a larger percentage of Internet search volume. Search engine users are loyal to one or a few search engines and are generally happy with search results. Thus, as long as Google continues to provide results deemed high in quality, Google likely will remain the top search engine. But what set Google apart from its competitors in the first place? The answer is PageRank. In this article I explain this simple mathematical algorithm that revolutionized Web search.
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.01
0.012164302 = product of:
0.024328604 = sum of:
0.024328604 = product of:
0.07298581 = sum of:
0.07298581 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07298581 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.01
0.012164302 = product of:
0.024328604 = sum of:
0.024328604 = product of:
0.07298581 = sum of:
0.07298581 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07298581 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
-
Belkin, N.J.; Cool, C.; Koenemann, J.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.: Using relevance feedback and ranking in interactive searching (1996)
0.01
0.011802815 = product of:
0.02360563 = sum of:
0.02360563 = product of:
0.07081689 = sum of:
0.07081689 = weight(_text_:c in 7588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07081689 = score(doc=7588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 7588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7588)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval (1988)
0.01
0.011802815 = product of:
0.02360563 = sum of:
0.02360563 = product of:
0.07081689 = sum of:
0.07081689 = weight(_text_:c in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07081689 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Cole, C.: Intelligent information retrieval: diagnosing information need : Part II: uncertainty expansion in a prototype of a diagnostic IR tool (1998)
0.01
0.011802815 = product of:
0.02360563 = sum of:
0.02360563 = product of:
0.07081689 = sum of:
0.07081689 = weight(_text_:c in 6432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07081689 = score(doc=6432,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 6432, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6432)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ruthven, I.; Lalmas, M.: Selective relevance feedback using term characteristics (1999)
0.01
0.011759723 = product of:
0.023519445 = sum of:
0.023519445 = product of:
0.07055833 = sum of:
0.07055833 = weight(_text_:i in 3824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07055833 = score(doc=3824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 3824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3824)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
