Search (191 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hengel, C.: Mapping name authorities : the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) (2007) 0.05 
    0.047934234 = product of:
  0.09586847 = sum of:
    0.09586847 = product of:
      0.1438027 = sum of:
        0.07081689 = weight(_text_:c in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07081689 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
        0.07298581 = weight(_text_:22 in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07298581 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  2. Poggendorff, J.C.: Biographisch-literarisches Handwörterbuch der exakten Naturwissenschaften (2000) 0.04 
    0.043793283 = product of:
  0.08758657 = sum of:
    0.08758657 = product of:
      0.13137984 = sum of:
        0.07055833 = weight(_text_:i in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07055833 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
        0.060821515 = weight(_text_:22 in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060821515 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 4.1996 15:41:22
    Type
    i
  3. Grimm, J.; Grimm, W.: Deutsches Wörterbuch - Der digitale Grimm : Elektronische Ausgabe der Erstbearbeitung (2004) 0.04 
    0.043793283 = product of:
  0.08758657 = sum of:
    0.08758657 = product of:
      0.13137984 = sum of:
        0.07055833 = weight(_text_:i in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07055833 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
        0.060821515 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060821515 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:54:37
    Type
    i
  4. Shirky, C.: Ontology is overrated : categories, links, and tags (2005) 0.04 
    0.04094898 = product of:
  0.08189796 = sum of:
    0.08189796 = product of:
      0.12284694 = sum of:
        0.093339905 = weight(_text_:i in 1265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093339905 = score(doc=1265,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.55127037 = fieldWeight in 1265, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1265)
        0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 1265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029507035 = score(doc=1265,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1265, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1265)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Today I want to talk about categorization, and I want to convince you that a lot of what we think we know about categorization is wrong. In particular, I want to convince you that many of the ways we're attempting to apply categorization to the electronic world are actually a bad fit, because we've adopted habits of mind that are left over from earlier strategies. I also want to convince you that what we're seeing when we see the Web is actually a radical break with previous categorization strategies, rather than an extension of them. The second part of the talk is more speculative, because it is often the case that old systems get broken before people know what's going to take their place. (Anyone watching the music industry can see this at work today.) That's what I think is happening with categorization. What I think is coming instead are much more organic ways of organizing information than our current categorization schemes allow, based on two units -- the link, which can point to anything, and the tag, which is a way of attaching labels to links. The strategy of tagging -- free-form labeling, without regard to categorical constraints -- seems like a recipe for disaster, but as the Web has shown us, you can extract a surprising amount of value from big messy data sets.
    Footnote
    This piece is based on two talks I gave in the spring of 2005 -- one at the O'Reilly ETech conference in March, entitled "Ontology Is Overrated", and one at the IMCExpo in April entitled "Folksonomies & Tags: The rise of user-developed classification." The written version is a heavily edited concatenation of those two talks.
  5. Wesch, M.: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us (2006) 0.04 
    0.035034627 = product of:
  0.07006925 = sum of:
    0.07006925 = product of:
      0.10510387 = sum of:
        0.056446664 = weight(_text_:i in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056446664 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
        0.04865721 = weight(_text_:22 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04865721 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Final version now available! http://youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g http://mediatedcultures.net A higher quality version is available for download here: http://www.mediafire.com/?6duzg3zioyd. Please note that this is the second draft and the final version will not be available until late February after I review all comments and revise the video. Please return for a new download link at that time.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  6. Brockhaus Enzyklopädie Digital (2005) 0.04 
    0.035034627 = product of:
  0.07006925 = sum of:
    0.07006925 = product of:
      0.10510387 = sum of:
        0.056446664 = weight(_text_:i in 3481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056446664 = score(doc=3481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3481)
        0.04865721 = weight(_text_:22 in 3481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04865721 = score(doc=3481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3481)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Komplette Textsubstanz aller 30 Bände + Zusatz- und Quellentexte mit nahezu demselben Umfang wie die Brockhaus Enzyklopädie Umfassende Recherchemöglichkeiten, einschließlich natürlichsprachlicher Suchhilfe Frei dreh- und zoombarer 3-D-Globus mit mehr als 2 Millionen geografischen Karteneinträgen 25000 Bilder und Zugang zur Bilddatenbank der dpa mit mehr als 2 Millionen Bildern 280 Videos, 140 Animationen, 6000 Audios, 22 000 kommentierte Weblinks u.v. m. Zugriff auf die Brockhaus Enzyklopädie Online (auch per minibrowserfähigem PDA, Smartphone oder Pocket-PC*), kostenlos bis 31.12.2010 1 USB-Memory-Stick in Docking-Station Für Windows
    Type
    i
  7. P.M. Enzyklopädie 2006 (2005) 0.03 
    0.026275968 = product of:
  0.052551936 = sum of:
    0.052551936 = product of:
      0.0788279 = sum of:
        0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 4960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042335 = score(doc=4960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4960)
        0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 4960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036492907 = score(doc=4960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4960)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 3.2006 15:03:22
    Type
    i
  8. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.02 
    0.021896642 = product of:
  0.043793283 = sum of:
    0.043793283 = product of:
      0.06568992 = sum of:
        0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035279166 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
        0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030410757 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  9. ws: ¬Das Große Wissen.de Lexikon 2004 (2003) 0.02 
    0.021414142 = product of:
  0.042828284 = sum of:
    0.042828284 = product of:
      0.06424242 = sum of:
        0.039913822 = weight(_text_:i in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039913822 = score(doc=1079,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.2357331 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
        0.024328604 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024328604 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 3.2004 12:58:22
    Footnote
    Rez. u.d.T. "Die Welt ist eine Scheibe" in: CD-Info. 2004, H.1, S.29 (ws): "Das Lexikon entspricht mit seinen 117.000 Stichworten vom Umfang etwa einem ca. 24-bändigen gedruckten Lexikon und vereint aktuelle Inhalte mit einer Vielzahl von Multimedia-Elementen wie Tondokumenten, Bildern und Videos. Dank ausgeklügelter Suchfunktionen, einem Online Update-Service und ergänzenden Links ins Internet, ist das Lexikon sowohl zum Nachschlagen als auch zum Stöbern geeignet. Neben dem Lexikon enthält die DVD noch ein Fremdwörterlexikon, ein viersprachiges Wörterbuch (E, F, I, E) sowie einen aktuellen Weltatlas. Mit Hilfe der übersichtlichen Benutzeroberfläche stehen dem Benutzer mehrere Einstiegsmöglichkeiten zur Verfügung: "Wissen A - Z" beinhaltet eine Stichwort- und Volltextsuche, "Timeline" liefert die Geschichte der Menschheit von den alten Ägyptern bis zum Fall Bagdads auf einem Zeitstrahl. "Themenreisen" stellt besondere Themengebiete wie beispielsweise "Aufstieg und Fall der Sowjetunion" kompakt mit allen zugehörigen Lexika-Einträgen und Internet-Links dar. Und in der "Mediengalerie" erschließen sich dem Benutzer die über 16.000 enthaltenen Medienelemente übersichtlich sortiert nach Themengebiet oder Medientyp."
    Type
    i
  10. Baeza-Yates, R.; Boldi, P.; Castillo, C.: Generalizing PageRank : damping functions for linkbased ranking algorithms (2006) 0.02 
    0.019972598 = product of:
  0.039945196 = sum of:
    0.039945196 = product of:
      0.059917793 = sum of:
        0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029507035 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
        0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030410757 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  11. Kaser, R.T.: If information wants to be free . . . then who's going to pay for it? (2000) 0.02 
    0.019501295 = product of:
  0.03900259 = sum of:
    0.03900259 = product of:
      0.11700776 = sum of:
        0.11700776 = weight(_text_:i in 1234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11700776 = score(doc=1234,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.6910539 = fieldWeight in 1234, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1234)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    I have become "brutally honest" of late, at least according to one listener who heard my remarks during a recent whistle stop speaking tour of publishing conventions. This comment caught me a little off guard. Not that I haven't always been frank, but I do try never to be brutal. The truth, I guess, can be painful, even if the intention of the teller is simply objectivity. This paper is based on a "brutally honest" talk I have been giving to publishers, first, in February, to the Association of American Publishers' Professional and Scholarly Publishing Division, at which point I was calling the piece, "The Illusion of Free Information." It was this initial rendition that led to the invitation to publish something here. Since then I've been working on the talk. I gave a second version of it in March to the assembly of the American Society of Information Dissemination Centers, where I called it, "When Sectors Clash: Public Access vs. Private Interest." And, most recently, I gave yet a third version of it to the governing board of the American Institute of Physics. This time I called it: "The Future of Society Publishing." The notion of free information, our government's proper role in distributing free information, and the future of scholarly publishing in a world of free information . . . these are the issues that are floating around in my head. My goal here is to tell you where my thinking is only at this moment, for I reserve the right to continue thinking and developing new permutations on this mentally challenging theme.
  12. McIlwaine, I.: Section on Classification and Indexing : review of activities, 2000-2001 (2001) 0.02 
    0.018815555 = product of:
  0.03763111 = sum of:
    0.03763111 = product of:
      0.11289333 = sum of:
        0.11289333 = weight(_text_:i in 6905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11289333 = score(doc=6905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 6905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6905)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Wikipedia : die freie Enzyklopädie (2004) 0.02 
    0.018815555 = product of:
  0.03763111 = sum of:
    0.03763111 = product of:
      0.11289333 = sum of:
        0.11289333 = weight(_text_:i in 3448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11289333 = score(doc=3448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 3448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3448)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    i
  14. Encyclopædia Britannica 2003 : Ultmate Reference Suite (2002) 0.02 
    0.017517313 = product of:
  0.035034627 = sum of:
    0.035034627 = product of:
      0.052551936 = sum of:
        0.028223332 = weight(_text_:i in 2182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028223332 = score(doc=2182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 2182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2182)
        0.024328604 = weight(_text_:22 in 2182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024328604 = score(doc=2182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2182)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: c't 2002, H.23, S.229 (T.J. Schult): "Mac-Anwender hatten bisher keine große Auswahl bei Multimedia-Enzyklopädien: entweder ein grottenschlechtes Kosmos Kompaktwissen, das dieses Jahr letztmalig erscheinen soll und sich dabei als Systhema Universallexikon tarnt. Oder ein Brockhaus in Text und Bild mit exzellenten Texten, aber flauer Medienausstattung. Die von Acclaim in Deutschland vertriebenen Britannica-Enzyklopädien stellen eine ausgezeichnete Alternative für den des Englischen Kundigen dar. Während früher nur Einfach-Britannicas auf dem Mac liefen, gilt dies nun für alle drei Versionen Student, Deluxe und Ultimate Reference Suite. Die Suite enthält dabei nicht nur alle 75 000 Artikel der 32 Britannica-Bände, sondern auch die 15 000 der Student Encyclopaedia, eines eigenen Schülerlexikons, das durch sein einfaches Englisch gerade für Nicht-Muttersprachler als Einstieg taugt. Wer es noch elementarer haben möchte, klickt sich zur Britannica Elementary Encyclopaedia, welche unter der gleichen Oberfläche wie die anderen Werke zugänglich ist. Schließlich umfasst die Suite einen Weltatlas sowie einsprachige Wörterbücher und Thesauri von Merriam-Webster in der Collegiate- und Student-Ausbaustufe mit allein 555 000 Definitionen, Synonymen und Antonymen. Wer viel in englischer Sprache recherchiert oder gar schreibt, leckt sich angesichts dieses Angebots (EUR 99,95) die Finger, zumal die Printausgabe gut 1600 Euro kostet. Die Texte sind einfach kolossal - allein das Inhaltsverzeichnis des Artikels Germany füllt sieben Bildschirmseiten. Schon die Inhalte aus den BritannicaBänden bieten mehr als doppelt so viel Text wie die rund tausend Euro kostende Brockhaus Enzyklopädie digital (c't 22/02, S. 38). Allein die 220 000 thematisch einsortierten Web-Links sind das Geld wert. Wer die 2,4 Gigabyte belegende Komplettinstallation wählt, muss sogar nie mehr die DVD (alternativ vier CD-ROMs) einlegen. Dieses Jahr muss sich niemand mehr mit dem Britannica-typischen Kuddelmuddel aus Lexikonartikeln und vielen, vielen Jahrbüchern herumschlagen - außer dem Basistext der drei Enzyklopädien sind 'nur' die zwei Jahrbücher 2001 und 2002 getrennt aufgeführt. Wer des Englischen mächtig ist, mag hier die gute Gelegenheit zum Kauf nutzen."
    Type
    i
  15. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.02 
    0.017517313 = product of:
  0.035034627 = sum of:
    0.035034627 = product of:
      0.052551936 = sum of:
        0.028223332 = weight(_text_:i in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028223332 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
        0.024328604 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024328604 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dublin Core is often presented as a modern form of catalog card -- a set of elements (and now qualifiers) that describe resources in a complete package. Sometimes it is proposed as an exchange format for sharing records among multiple collections. The founding principle that "every element is optional and repeatable" reinforces the notion that a Dublin Core description is to be taken as a whole. This paper, in contrast, is based on a much different premise: Dublin Core is a language. More precisely, it is a small language for making a particular class of statements about resources. Like natural languages, it has a vocabulary of word-like terms, the two classes of which -- elements and qualifiers -- function within statements like nouns and adjectives; and it has a syntax for arranging elements and qualifiers into statements according to a simple pattern. Whenever tourists order a meal or ask directions in an unfamiliar language, considerate native speakers will spontaneously limit themselves to basic words and simple sentence patterns along the lines of "I am so-and-so" or "This is such-and-such". Linguists call this pidginization. In such situations, a small phrase book or translated menu can be most helpful. By analogy, today's Web has been called an Internet Commons where users and information providers from a wide range of scientific, commercial, and social domains present their information in a variety of incompatible data models and description languages. In this context, Dublin Core presents itself as a metadata pidgin for digital tourists who must find their way in this linguistically diverse landscape. Its vocabulary is small enough to learn quickly, and its basic pattern is easily grasped. It is well-suited to serve as an auxiliary language for digital libraries. This grammar starts by defining terms. It then follows a 200-year-old tradition of English grammar teaching by focusing on the structure of single statements. It concludes by looking at the growing dictionary of Dublin Core vocabulary terms -- its registry, and at how statements can be used to build the metadata equivalent of paragraphs and compositions -- the application profile.
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22
  16. Beagle, D.: Visualizing keyword distribution across multidisciplinary c-space (2003) 0.02 
    0.017277371 = product of:
  0.034554742 = sum of:
    0.034554742 = product of:
      0.051832113 = sum of:
        0.0211675 = weight(_text_:i in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0211675 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.12501636 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
        0.030664613 = weight(_text_:c in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030664613 = score(doc=1202,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.19803005 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The concept of c-space is proposed as a visualization schema relating containers of content to cataloging surrogates and classification structures. Possible applications of keyword vector clusters within c-space could include improved retrieval rates through the use of captioning within visual hierarchies, tracings of semantic bleeding among subclasses, and access to buried knowledge within subject-neutral publication containers. The Scholastica Project is described as one example, following a tradition of research dating back to the 1980's. Preliminary focus group assessment indicates that this type of classification rendering may offer digital library searchers enriched entry strategies and an expanded range of re-entry vocabularies. Those of us who work in traditional libraries typically assume that our systems of classification: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), are descriptive rather than prescriptive. In other words, LCC classes and subclasses approximate natural groupings of texts that reflect an underlying order of knowledge, rather than arbitrary categories prescribed by librarians to facilitate efficient shelving. Philosophical support for this assumption has traditionally been found in a number of places, from the archetypal tree of knowledge, to Aristotelian categories, to the concept of discursive formations proposed by Michel Foucault. Gary P. Radford has elegantly described an encounter with Foucault's discursive formations in the traditional library setting: "Just by looking at the titles on the spines, you can see how the books cluster together...You can identify those books that seem to form the heart of the discursive formation and those books that reside on the margins. Moving along the shelves, you see those books that tend to bleed over into other classifications and that straddle multiple discursive formations. You can physically and sensually experience...those points that feel like state borders or national boundaries, those points where one subject ends and another begins, or those magical places where one subject has morphed into another..."
    But what happens to this awareness in a digital library? Can discursive formations be represented in cyberspace, perhaps through diagrams in a visualization interface? And would such a schema be helpful to a digital library user? To approach this question, it is worth taking a moment to reconsider what Radford is looking at. First, he looks at titles to see how the books cluster. To illustrate, I scanned one hundred books on the shelves of a college library under subclass HT 101-395, defined by the LCC subclass caption as Urban groups. The City. Urban sociology. Of the first 100 titles in this sequence, fifty included the word "urban" or variants (e.g. "urbanization"). Another thirty-five used the word "city" or variants. These keywords appear to mark their titles as the heart of this discursive formation. The scattering of titles not using "urban" or "city" used related terms such as "town," "community," or in one case "skyscrapers." So we immediately see some empirical correlation between keywords and classification. But we also see a problem with the commonly used search technique of title-keyword. A student interested in urban studies will want to know about this entire subclass, and may wish to browse every title available therein. A title-keyword search on "urban" will retrieve only half of the titles, while a search on "city" will retrieve just over a third. There will be no overlap, since no titles in this sample contain both words. The only place where both words appear in a common string is in the LCC subclass caption, but captions are not typically indexed in library Online Public Access Catalogs (OPACs). In a traditional library, this problem is mitigated when the student goes to the shelf looking for any one of the books and suddenly discovers a much wider selection than the keyword search had led him to expect. But in a digital library, the issue of non-retrieval can be more problematic, as studies have indicated. Micco and Popp reported that, in a study funded partly by the U.S. Department of Education, 65 of 73 unskilled users searching for material on U.S./Soviet foreign relations found some material but never realized they had missed a large percentage of what was in the database.
  17. Encyclopædia Britannica (2001) 0.02 
    0.016463611 = product of:
  0.032927223 = sum of:
    0.032927223 = product of:
      0.09878167 = sum of:
        0.09878167 = weight(_text_:i in 1718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09878167 = score(doc=1718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 1718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1718)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    i
  18. ¬Das große Lexikon 2001 (2000) 0.02 
    0.016463611 = product of:
  0.032927223 = sum of:
    0.032927223 = product of:
      0.09878167 = sum of:
        0.09878167 = weight(_text_:i in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09878167 = score(doc=5240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    i
  19. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.02 
    0.01597808 = product of:
  0.03195616 = sum of:
    0.03195616 = product of:
      0.047934234 = sum of:
        0.02360563 = weight(_text_:c in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02360563 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
        0.024328604 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024328604 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  20. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003) 0.02 
    0.015866788 = product of:
  0.031733576 = sum of:
    0.031733576 = product of:
      0.095200725 = sum of:
        0.095200725 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095200725 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
    Object
    DDC-22

Authors

Languages

  • e 127
  • d 57
  • a 2
  • el 2
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 53
  • i 38
  • m 5
  • n 5
  • r 3
  • x 3
  • p 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications