Search (173 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.04
    0.044562053 = product of:
      0.089124106 = sum of:
        0.089124106 = product of:
          0.35649642 = sum of:
            0.35649642 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.35649642 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38058892 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.04
    0.039945196 = product of:
      0.07989039 = sum of:
        0.07989039 = product of:
          0.119835585 = sum of:
            0.05901407 = weight(_text_:c in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05901407 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
            0.060821515 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060821515 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  3. Koch, C.: Can a photodiode be conscious? (2013) 0.04
    0.035560213 = product of:
      0.071120426 = sum of:
        0.071120426 = product of:
          0.10668063 = sum of:
            0.039913822 = weight(_text_:i in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039913822 = score(doc=4560,freq=1.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2357331 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                  1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                    1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
            0.066766806 = weight(_text_:c in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.066766806 = score(doc=4560,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.43117565 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Erwiderung auf die Rezension von John Searle zu: Koch, C.: Consciousness: confessions of a romantic reductionist. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press 2012 in:The New York Review of Books, 10.01.2013 [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/03/07/can-photodiode-be-conscious/?pagination=false&printpage=true]
  4. Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013) 0.04
    0.035400786 = product of:
      0.07080157 = sum of:
        0.07080157 = product of:
          0.10620236 = sum of:
            0.08554743 = weight(_text_:i in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08554743 = score(doc=1077,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.5052476 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
            0.020654924 = weight(_text_:c in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020654924 = score(doc=1077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
  5. Ilhan, A.; Henkel, M.; Dorsch, I.; Meschede, C.: Social Media, Open Innovation, Altmetrics : aber auch Wissensrepräsentation und Zitationsanalyse: Diversifizierung der Informationswissenschaft (2018) 0.03
    0.03455264 = product of:
      0.06910528 = sum of:
        0.06910528 = product of:
          0.10365792 = sum of:
            0.056446664 = weight(_text_:i in 4073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056446664 = score(doc=4073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 4073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4073)
            0.04721126 = weight(_text_:c in 4073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04721126 = score(doc=4073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 4073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4073)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Menzel, C.: Knowledge representation, the World Wide Web, and the evolution of logic (2011) 0.03
    0.031759724 = product of:
      0.06351945 = sum of:
        0.06351945 = product of:
          0.09527917 = sum of:
            0.05987073 = weight(_text_:i in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05987073 = score(doc=761,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, I have traced a series of evolutionary adaptations of FOL motivated entirely by its use by knowledge engineers to represent and share information on the Web culminating in the development of Common Logic. While the primary goal in this paper has been to document this evolution, it is arguable, I think that CL's syntactic and semantic egalitarianism better realizes the goal "topic neutrality" that a logic should ideally exemplify - understood, at least in part, as the idea that logic should as far as possible not itself embody any metaphysical presuppositions. Instead of retaining the traditional metaphysical divisions of FOL that reflect its Fregean origins, CL begins as it were with a single, metaphysically homogeneous domain in which, potentially, anything can play the traditional roles of object, property, relation, and function. Note that the effect of this is not to destroy traditional metaphysical divisions. Rather, it simply to refrain from building those divisions explicitly into one's logic; instead, such divisions are left to the user to introduce and enforce axiomatically in an explicit metaphysical theory.
  7. Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016) 0.03
    0.030803367 = product of:
      0.061606735 = sum of:
        0.061606735 = product of:
          0.0924101 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
            0.050075103 = weight(_text_:c in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050075103 = score(doc=3102,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Location
    I
  8. Schlögl, C.: Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft : Gegenstandsbereich und Perspektiven (2014) 0.03
    0.027961638 = product of:
      0.055923276 = sum of:
        0.055923276 = product of:
          0.08388491 = sum of:
            0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04130985 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
            0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042575058 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2017 18:04:28
  9. Mühlbauer, P.: Upload in Computer klappt . (2018) 0.03
    0.027961638 = product of:
      0.055923276 = sum of:
        0.055923276 = product of:
          0.08388491 = sum of:
            0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 4113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04130985 = score(doc=4113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 4113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4113)
            0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 4113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042575058 = score(doc=4113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4113)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Den drei an der Technischen Universität in Wien forschenden Informatikern Mathias Lechner, Radu Grosu und Ramin Hasani ist es gelungen, das Nervensystem des Fadenwurm Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) als Software in einen Computer zu übertragen und nachzuweisen, dass der "hochgeladene" virtuelle Wurm auf Reize genau so reagiert wie ein echter Nematodenwurm auf echte Reize in der Realität. Dafür ließen sie ihn eine Aufgabe bewältigen, die Hasani zufolge dem Balancieren eines Stabes ähnelt.
    Date
    12. 2.2018 15:22:19
  10. Lamb, I.; Larson, C.: Shining a light on scientific data : building a data catalog to foster data sharing and reuse (2016) 0.03
    0.02591448 = product of:
      0.05182896 = sum of:
        0.05182896 = product of:
          0.07774344 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 3195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=3195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3195)
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 3195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=3195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3195)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Klic, L.; Miller, M.; Nelson, J.K.; Pattuelli, C.; Provo, A.: ¬The drawings of the Florentine painters : from print catalog to linked open data (2017) 0.03
    0.02591448 = product of:
      0.05182896 = sum of:
        0.05182896 = product of:
          0.07774344 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 4105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=4105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4105)
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 4105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=4105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4105)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Drawings of The Florentine Painters project created the first online database of Florentine Renaissance drawings by applying Linked Open Data (LOD) techniques to a foundational text of the same name, first published by Bernard Berenson in 1903 (revised and expanded editions, 1938 and 1961). The goal was to make Berenson's catalog information-still an essential information resource today-available in a machine-readable format, allowing researchers to access the source content through open data services. This paper provides a technical overview of the methods and processes applied in the conversion of Berenson's catalog to LOD using the CIDOC-CRM ontology; it also discusses the different phases of the project, focusing on the challenges and issues of data transformation and publishing. The project was funded by the Samuel H. Kress Foundation and organized by Villa I Tatti, The Harvard University Center for Italian Renaissance Studies. Catalog: http://florentinedrawings.itatti.harvard.edu. Data Endpoint: http://data.itatti.harvard.edu.
  12. Cecchini, C.; Zanchetta, C.; Paolo Borin, P.; Xausa, G.: Computational design e sistemi di classificazione per la verifica predittiva delle prestazioni di sistema degli organismi edilizi : Computational design and classification systems to support predictive checking of performance of building systems (2017) 0.03
    0.025669476 = product of:
      0.051338952 = sum of:
        0.051338952 = product of:
          0.077008426 = sum of:
            0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 5856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035279166 = score(doc=5856,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 5856, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5856)
            0.041729257 = weight(_text_:c in 5856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041729257 = score(doc=5856,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 5856, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5856)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    i
  13. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.02
    0.022281026 = product of:
      0.044562053 = sum of:
        0.044562053 = product of:
          0.17824821 = sum of:
            0.17824821 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17824821 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38058892 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  14. Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018) 0.02
    0.019972598 = product of:
      0.039945196 = sum of:
        0.039945196 = product of:
          0.059917793 = sum of:
            0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029507035 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
            0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030410757 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:27:22
  15. Kristoffersen, K.A.: Mapping mot Dewey (2016) 0.02
    0.018815555 = product of:
      0.03763111 = sum of:
        0.03763111 = product of:
          0.11289333 = sum of:
            0.11289333 = weight(_text_:i in 1950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11289333 = score(doc=1950,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 1950, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1950)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Mapping er en aktivitet hvor det etableres relasjoner mellom begreper i to ulike kontrollerte vokabularer. Man mapper fra et kildevokabular og finner korresponderende begreper i et målvokabular. Mapping brukes også til å benevne resultatet av en mappingaktivitet, dvs. relasjonen mellom et begrep i ett vokabular og en eller flere begreper i et annet vokabular.
  16. Saabiyeh, N.: What is a good ontology semantic similarity measure that considers multiple inheritance cases of concepts? (2018) 0.02
    0.016463611 = product of:
      0.032927223 = sum of:
        0.032927223 = product of:
          0.09878167 = sum of:
            0.09878167 = weight(_text_:i in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09878167 = score(doc=4530,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    I need to measure semantic similarity between CSO ontology concepts, depending on Ontology structure (concept path, depth, least common subsumer (LCS) ...). CSO (Computer Science Ontology) is a large-scale ontology of research areas. A concepts in CSO may have multiple parents/super concepts (i.e. a concept may be a child of many other concepts), e.g. : (world wide web) is parent of (semantic web) (semantics) is parent of (semantic web) I found some measures that meet my needs, but the papers proposing these measures are not cited, so i got hesitated. I also found a measure that depends on weighted edges, but multiple inheritance (super concepts) is not considered..
  17. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.01
    0.014335768 = product of:
      0.028671537 = sum of:
        0.028671537 = product of:
          0.086014606 = sum of:
            0.086014606 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086014606 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  18. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.01
    0.014191686 = product of:
      0.028383372 = sum of:
        0.028383372 = product of:
          0.085150115 = sum of:
            0.085150115 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085150115 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  19. Röthler, D.: "Lehrautomaten" oder die MOOC-Vision der späten 60er Jahre (2014) 0.01
    0.012164302 = product of:
      0.024328604 = sum of:
        0.024328604 = product of:
          0.07298581 = sum of:
            0.07298581 = weight(_text_:22 in 1552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07298581 = score(doc=1552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1552)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2018 11:04:35
  20. Dachwitz, I.: Klare Grenzen für Digitalwirtschaft : Sachverständige fordern Algorithmengesetz & Co. (2016) 0.01
    0.011759723 = product of:
      0.023519445 = sum of:
        0.023519445 = product of:
          0.07055833 = sum of:
            0.07055833 = weight(_text_:i in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07055833 = score(doc=3299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • d 84
  • e 75
  • i 6
  • a 1
  • no 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 114
  • s 4
  • x 4
  • i 2
  • m 2
  • p 2
  • r 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…