-
Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023)
0.05
0.04759848 = product of:
0.09519696 = sum of:
0.09519696 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030410757 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:02
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.03
0.030655298 = product of:
0.061310597 = sum of:
0.061310597 = product of:
0.09196589 = sum of:
0.049390834 = weight(_text_:i in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049390834 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042575058 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.03
0.02673723 = product of:
0.05347446 = sum of:
0.05347446 = product of:
0.21389784 = sum of:
0.21389784 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21389784 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38058892 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Sanfilippo, M.R.; Shvartzshnaider, Y.; Reyes, I.; Nissenbaum, H.; Egelman, S.: Disaster privacy/privacy disaster (2020)
0.03
0.02591448 = product of:
0.05182896 = sum of:
0.05182896 = product of:
0.07774344 = sum of:
0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 5960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042335 = score(doc=5960,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 5960, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5960)
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 5960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=5960,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5960, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5960)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Privacy expectations during disasters differ significantly from nonemergency situations. This paper explores the actual privacy practices of popular disaster apps, highlighting location information flows. Our empirical study compares content analysis of privacy policies and government agency policies, structured by the contextual integrity framework, with static and dynamic app analysis documenting the personal data sent by 15 apps. We identify substantive gaps between regulation and guidance, privacy policies, and information flows, resulting from ambiguities and exploitation of exemptions. Results also indicate gaps between governance and practice, including the following: (a) Many apps ignore self-defined policies; (b) while some policies state they "might" access location data under certain conditions, those conditions are not met as 12 apps included in our study capture location immediately upon initial launch under default settings; and (c) not all third-party data recipients are identified in policy, including instances that violate expectations of trusted third parties.
-
Higgins, C.: 'I coulda had class' : the difficulties of classifying film in Library of Congress Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification (2022)
0.03
0.02591448 = product of:
0.05182896 = sum of:
0.05182896 = product of:
0.07774344 = sum of:
0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 1095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042335 = score(doc=1095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1095)
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 1095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=1095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1095)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023)
0.02
0.023967117 = product of:
0.047934234 = sum of:
0.047934234 = product of:
0.07190135 = sum of:
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:53:32
-
Ma, L.: Information, platformized (2023)
0.02
0.023967117 = product of:
0.047934234 = sum of:
0.047934234 = product of:
0.07190135 = sum of:
0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035408445 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scholarly publications are often regarded as "information" by default. They are collected, organized, preserved, and made accessible as knowledge records. However, the instances of article retraction, misconduct and malpractices of researchers and the replication crisis have raised concerns about the informativeness and evidential qualities of information. Among many factors, knowledge production has moved away from "normal science" under the systemic influences of platformization involving the datafication and commodification of scholarly articles, research profiles and research activities. This article aims to understand the platformization of information by examining how research practices and knowledge production are steered by market and platform mechanisms in four ways: (a) ownership of information; (b) metrics for sale; (c) relevance by metrics, and (d) market-based competition. In conclusion, the article argues that information is platformized when platforms hold the dominating power in determining what kinds of information can be disseminated and rewarded and when informativeness is decoupled from the normative agreement or consensus co-constructed and co-determined in an open and public discourse.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 19:01:47
-
Brown, T.B.; Mann, B.; Ryder, N.; Subbiah, M.; Kaplan, J.; Dhariwal, P.; Neelakantan, A.; Shyam, P.; Sastry, G.; Askell, A.; Agarwal, S.; Herbert-Voss, A.; Krueger, G.; Henighan, T.; Child, R.; Ramesh, A.; Ziegler, D.M.; Wu, J.; Winter, C.; Hesse, C.; Chen, M.; Sigler, E.; Litwin, M.; Gray, S.; Chess, B.; Clark, J.; Berner, C.; McCandlish, S.; Radford, A.; Sutskever, I.; Amodei, D.: Language models are few-shot learners (2020)
0.02
0.023036495 = product of:
0.04607299 = sum of:
0.04607299 = product of:
0.069109485 = sum of:
0.028223332 = weight(_text_:i in 872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028223332 = score(doc=872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=872)
0.040886153 = weight(_text_:c in 872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040886153 = score(doc=872,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.26404008 = fieldWeight in 872, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=872)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wu, Z.; Li, R.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, J.; Jiang, J.; Su, X.: ¬A user sensitive subject protection approach for book search service (2020)
0.02
0.021896642 = product of:
0.043793283 = sum of:
0.043793283 = product of:
0.06568992 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=5617,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030410757 = score(doc=5617,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In a digital library, book search is one of the most important information services. However, with the rapid development of network technologies such as cloud computing, the server-side of a digital library is becoming more and more untrusted; thus, how to prevent the disclosure of users' book query privacy is causing people's increasingly extensive concern. In this article, we propose to construct a group of plausible fake queries for each user book query to cover up the sensitive subjects behind users' queries. First, we propose a basic framework for the privacy protection in book search, which requires no change to the book search algorithm running on the server-side, and no compromise to the accuracy of book search. Second, we present a privacy protection model for book search to formulate the constraints that ideal fake queries should satisfy, that is, (i) the feature similarity, which measures the confusion effect of fake queries on users' queries, and (ii) the privacy exposure, which measures the cover-up effect of fake queries on users' sensitive subjects. Third, we discuss the algorithm implementation for the privacy model. Finally, the effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated by theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation.
- Date
- 6. 1.2020 17:22:25
-
Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023)
0.02
0.021896642 = product of:
0.043793283 = sum of:
0.043793283 = product of:
0.06568992 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030410757 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2023 19:27:56
-
Lueg, C.: To be or not to be (embodied) : that is not the question (2020)
0.02
0.021595402 = product of:
0.043190803 = sum of:
0.043190803 = product of:
0.0647862 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 5511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=5511,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 5511, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5511)
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 5511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=5511,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5511, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5511)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Two articles in a recent special issue on Information and the Body published in the journal Library Trends stand out because of the way they are identifying, albeit indirectly, a formidable challenge to library information science (LIS). In her contribution, Bates warns that understanding information behavior demands recognizing and studying "any one important element of the ecology [in which humans are embedded]." Hartel, on the other hand, suggests that LIS would not lose much but would have lots to gain by focusing on core LIS themes instead of embodied information, since the latter may be unproductive, as LIS scholars are "latecomer[s] to a mature research domain." I would argue that LIS as a discipline cannot avoid dealing with those pesky mammals aka patrons or users; like the cognate discipline and "community of communities" human computer interaction (HCI), LIS needs the interdisciplinarity to succeed. LIS researchers are uniquely positioned to help bring together LIS's deep understanding of "information" and embodiment perspectives that may or may not have been developed in other disciplines. LIS researchers need to be more explicit about what their original contribution is, though, and what may have been appropriated from other disciplines.
-
Yigit-Sert, S.; Altingovde, I.S.; Macdonald, C.; Ounis, I.; Ulusoy, Ö,: Explicit diversification of search results across multiple dimensions for educational search (2021)
0.02
0.021595402 = product of:
0.043190803 = sum of:
0.043190803 = product of:
0.0647862 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
MacKrill, K.; Silvester, C.; Pennebaker, J.W.; Petrie, K.J.: What makes an idea worth spreading? : language markers of popularity in TED talks by academics and other speakers (2021)
0.02
0.021595402 = product of:
0.043190803 = sum of:
0.043190803 = product of:
0.0647862 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=312,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 312, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=312)
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=312,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 312, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=312)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- TED talks are a popular internet forum where new ideas and research are presented by a wide variety of speakers. In this study, we investigated how the language used in TED talks influenced popularity and viewer ratings. We also investigated the differences in linguistic style and ratings of talks given by academics and non-academics. The transcripts of 1866 talks were analyzed using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count program and eight language variables were correlated with number of views and viewer ratings. We found that talks with more analytic language received fewer views, while a greater use of the pronoun "I," positive emotion and social words was associated with more views. Talks with these linguistic characteristics received more emotional viewer ratings such as inspiring or courageous. When comparing talks by academics and non-academics, there was no difference in the overall popularity but viewers rated talks by academics as more fascinating, informative, and persuasive while non-academics received higher emotional ratings. The implications for understanding social influence processes are discussed.
-
Thomer, A.K.: Integrative data reuse at scientifically significant sites : case studies at Yellowstone National Park and the La Brea Tar Pits (2022)
0.02
0.021595402 = product of:
0.043190803 = sum of:
0.043190803 = product of:
0.0647862 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scientifically significant sites are the source of, and long-term repository for, considerable amounts of data-particularly in the natural sciences. However, the unique data practices of the researchers and resource managers at these sites have been relatively understudied. Through case studies of two scientifically significant sites (the hot springs at Yellowstone National Park and the fossil deposits at the La Brea Tar Pits), I developed rich descriptions of site-based research and data curation, and high-level data models of information classes needed to support integrative data reuse. Each framework treats the geospatial site and its changing natural characteristics as a distinct class of information; more commonly considered information classes such as observational and sampling data, and project metadata, are defined in relation to the site itself. This work contributes (a) case studies of the values and data needs for researchers and resource managers at scientifically significant sites, (b) an information framework to support integrative reuse at these sites, and (c) a discussion of data practices at scientifically significant sites.
-
Tang, M.-C.; Liao, I.-H.: Preference diversity and openness to novelty : scales construction from the perspective of movie recommendation (2022)
0.02
0.021595402 = product of:
0.043190803 = sum of:
0.043190803 = product of:
0.0647862 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Zhang, Y.; Wu, D.; Hagen, L.; Song, I.-Y.; Mostafa, J.; Oh, S.; Anderson, T.; Shah, C.; Bishop, B.W.; Hopfgartner, F.; Eckert, K.; Federer, L.; Saltz, J.S.: Data science curriculum in the iField (2023)
0.02
0.021595402 = product of:
0.043190803 = sum of:
0.043190803 = product of:
0.0647862 = sum of:
0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035279166 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021)
0.02
0.019972598 = product of:
0.039945196 = sum of:
0.039945196 = product of:
0.059917793 = sum of:
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030410757 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
-
Cox, A.; Fulton, C.: Geographies of information behaviour : a conceptual exploration (2022)
0.02
0.019972598 = product of:
0.039945196 = sum of:
0.039945196 = product of:
0.059917793 = sum of:
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030410757 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 6.2022 17:20:22
-
Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023)
0.02
0.019972598 = product of:
0.039945196 = sum of:
0.039945196 = product of:
0.059917793 = sum of:
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030410757 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:43:02
-
Yu, C.; Xue, H.; An, L.; Li, G.: ¬A lightweight semantic-enhanced interactive network for efficient short-text matching (2023)
0.02
0.019972598 = product of:
0.039945196 = sum of:
0.039945196 = product of:
0.059917793 = sum of:
0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029507035 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030410757 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 19:05:27
