Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Li, J."
  1. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.07
    0.073460095 = product of:
      0.14692019 = sum of:
        0.14692019 = sum of:
          0.10462171 = weight(_text_:q in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10462171 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04415143 = queryNorm
              0.3618062 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.042298485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042298485 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04415143 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  2. Li, J.; Sun, A.; Xing, Z.: To do or not to do : distill crowdsourced negative caveats to augment api documentation (2018) 0.04
    0.044387236 = product of:
      0.08877447 = sum of:
        0.08877447 = product of:
          0.17754894 = sum of:
            0.17754894 = weight(_text_:q in 4575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17754894 = score(doc=4575,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61400557 = fieldWeight in 4575, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4575)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Negative caveats of application programming interfaces (APIs) are about "how not to use an API," which are often absent from the official API documentation. When these caveats are overlooked, programming errors may emerge from misusing APIs, leading to heavy discussions on Q&A websites like Stack Overflow. If the overlooked caveats could be mined from these discussions, they would be beneficial for programmers to avoid misuse of APIs. However, it is challenging because the discussions are informal, redundant, and diverse. For this, for example, we propose Disca, a novel approach for automatically Distilling desirable API negative caveats from unstructured Q&A discussions. Through sentence selection and prominent term clustering, Disca ensures that distilled caveats are context-independent, prominent, semantically diverse, and nonredundant. Quantitative evaluation in our experiments shows that the proposed Disca significantly outperforms four text-summarization techniques. We also show that the distilled API negative caveats could greatly augment API documentation through qualitative analysis.
  3. Du, Q.; Li, J.; Du, Y.; Wang, G.A.; Fan, W.: Predicting crowdfunding project success based on backers' language preferences (2021) 0.03
    0.031386513 = product of:
      0.06277303 = sum of:
        0.06277303 = product of:
          0.12554605 = sum of:
            0.12554605 = weight(_text_:q in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12554605 = score(doc=415,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.43416747 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Min, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Bu, Y.; Pei, L.; Sun, J.: Innovation or imitation : the diffusion of citations (2018) 0.03
    0.026155427 = product of:
      0.052310854 = sum of:
        0.052310854 = product of:
          0.10462171 = sum of:
            0.10462171 = weight(_text_:q in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10462171 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.3618062 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Citations in scientific literature are important both for tracking the historical development of scientific ideas and for forecasting research trends. However, the diffusion mechanisms underlying the citation process remain poorly understood, despite the frequent and longstanding use of citation counts for assessment purposes within the scientific community. Here, we extend the study of citation dynamics to a more general diffusion process to understand how citation growth associates with different diffusion patterns. Using a classic diffusion model, we quantify and illustrate specific diffusion mechanisms which have been proven to exert a significant impact on the growth and decay of citation counts. Experiments reveal a positive relation between the "low p and low q" pattern and high scientific impact. A sharp citation peak produced by rapid change of citation counts, however, has a negative effect on future impact. In addition, we have suggested a simple indicator, saturation level, to roughly estimate an individual article's current stage in the life cycle and its potential to attract future attention. The proposed approach can also be extended to higher levels of aggregation (e.g., individual scientists, journals, institutions), providing further insights into the practice of scientific evaluation.
  5. Lin, X.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.: Theme creation for digital collections (2008) 0.01
    0.0104683405 = product of:
      0.020936681 = sum of:
        0.020936681 = product of:
          0.041873362 = sum of:
            0.041873362 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041873362 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  6. Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016) 0.01
    0.008972864 = product of:
      0.017945727 = sum of:
        0.017945727 = product of:
          0.035891455 = sum of:
            0.035891455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035891455 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:13:32
  7. Zheng, R.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.: ¬A framework for authorship identification of online messages : writing-style features and classification techniques (2006) 0.01
    0.0074773864 = product of:
      0.014954773 = sum of:
        0.014954773 = product of:
          0.029909546 = sum of:
            0.029909546 = weight(_text_:22 in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029909546 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:14:37