Search (72 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Davies, R.: Q-analysis : a methodology for librarianship and information science (1985) 0.08
    0.076880954 = product of:
      0.15376191 = sum of:
        0.15376191 = product of:
          0.30752382 = sum of:
            0.30752382 = weight(_text_:q in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.30752382 = score(doc=589,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                1.0634888 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Q-analysis is a methodology for investigating a wide range of structural phenomena. Strutures are defined in terms of relations between members of sets and their salient features are revealed using techniques of algebraic topology. However, the basic method can be mastered by non-mathematicians. Q-analysis has been applied to problems as diverse as discovering the rules for the diagnosis of a rare disease and the study of tactics in a football match. Other applications include some of interest to librarians and information scientists. In bibliometrics, Q-analysis has proved capable of emulating techniques such as bibliographic coupling, co-citation analysis and co-word analysis. It has also been used to produce a classification scheme for television programmes based on different principles from most bibliographic classifications. This paper introduces the basic ideas of Q-analysis. Applications relevant to librarianship and information science are reviewed and present limitations of the approach described. New theoretical advances including some in other fields such as planning and design theory and artificial intelligence may lead to a still more powerful method of investigating structure
    Object
    Q-Analysis
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.03
    0.029909546 = product of:
      0.05981909 = sum of:
        0.05981909 = product of:
          0.11963818 = sum of:
            0.11963818 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11963818 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  3. Pietris, M.K.D.: LCSH update (1988) 0.03
    0.029909546 = product of:
      0.05981909 = sum of:
        0.05981909 = product of:
          0.11963818 = sum of:
            0.11963818 = weight(_text_:22 in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11963818 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 13(1988), S.19-22
  4. Woods, W.A.: What's important about knowledge representation? (1983) 0.03
    0.029909546 = product of:
      0.05981909 = sum of:
        0.05981909 = product of:
          0.11963818 = sum of:
            0.11963818 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11963818 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27
  5. Crovisier, R.; Intner, S.S.: Classification for astronomy : the QB schedule of the Library of Congress Classification (1987) 0.03
    0.026155427 = product of:
      0.052310854 = sum of:
        0.052310854 = product of:
          0.10462171 = sum of:
            0.10462171 = weight(_text_:q in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10462171 = score(doc=383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.3618062 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The overall format of the QB schedule still bears the imprint of its origin in late Victorian times and can be puzzling to those acquainted with recent ideas in the field. This article explores some of the factors behind the present appearance of the schedule, current areas of research in astronomy and how they relate to its history, and particular deficiencies in the QBs for dealing with recent research. Before the 1950s, astronomy was a very limited science, concerned mainly with optical observations of the heavens and the analysis of celestial motions and stellar interiors. More than one-fourth of all fundamental astronomical phenomena have been observed for the first time within the past 30 years. The invention of non-optical means of observation and the exploration of space greatly increased the resolving power of known objects within the solar system and gave rise to new topics. Recent research in astronomy greatly increased the scope of topics within the science, while, paradoxically, making astronomy itself a less clearly defined subject. Astronomy's debt to other sciences is seen most clearly in Library of Congress Classification's tendency to scatter astronomical topics throughout the rest of the Q schedule. Suggestions are offered for changes which could make QB a more relevant method of classifying current astronomy materials.
  6. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  7. Tell, B.V.: Cataloging rules and database production : implications for manpower training in a developing country (1989) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.22-27
  8. Kashyap, M.M.: Algorithms for analysis and representation of subject contents in a documentary language (1983) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library herald. 22(1983), S.1-29
  9. Piternick, A.B.: What's in a name? : use of names and titles in subject searching (1985) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=4482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Database. 8(1985) no.4, S.22-28
  10. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  11. Guedj, D.: Nicholas Bourbaki, collective mathematician : an interview with Clause Chevalley (1985) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 6075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=6075,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6075, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6075)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mathematical intelligencer. 7(1985), S.18-22
  12. Walker, S.: Improving subject access painlessly : recent work on the Okapi online catalogue projects (1988) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.21-31
  13. Hug, H.; Nöthiger, R.: ETHICS: an online public access catalogue at ETH-Bibliothek, Zürich (1988) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.133-142
  14. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  15. Repo, A.J.: Economics and information (1987) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=11,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.3-36
  16. Carroll, J.M.; Mack, R.L.: Metaphor, computing systems and active learning (1985) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=6506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International journal of man-machine studies. 22(1985), S.39-57
  17. Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
  18. Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
  19. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  20. Information brokers and reference services (1989) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Reference librarian; no.22

Types

  • a 64
  • m 5
  • s 3
  • More… Less…