Search (35 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Kretschmer, H.; Kretschmer, T.: Well-ordered collaboration structures of co-author pairs in journals (2006) 0.04 
    0.036989365 = product of:
  0.07397873 = sum of:
    0.07397873 = product of:
      0.14795746 = sum of:
        0.14795746 = weight(_text_:q in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14795746 = score(doc=25,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.5116713 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In single-authored bibliographies only single scientist distribution can be found. But in multi-authored bibliographies single scientists distribution, pairs distribution, triples distribution, etc., can be presented. Whereas regarding Lotka's law single scientists P distribution (both in single-authored and in multi-authored bibliographies) is of interest, in the future pairs P, Q distribution, triples P, Q, R distribution, etc. should be considered Starting with pair distribution, the following question arises in the present paper: Is there also any regularity or well-ordered structure for the distribution of coauthor pairs in journals in analogy to Lotka's law for the distribution of single authors? Usually, in information science "laws " or "regularities " (for example Lotka's law) are mathematical descriptions of observed data inform of functions; however explanations of these phenomena are mostly missing. By contrast, in this paper the derivation of a formula for describing the distribution of the number of co-author pairs will be presented based on wellknown regularities in socio psychology or sociology in conjunction with the Gestalt theory as explanation for well-ordered collaboration structures and production of scientific literature, as well as derivations from Lotka's law. The assumed regularities for the distribution of co-author pairs in journals could be shown in the co-authorship data (1980-1998) of the journals Science, Nature, Proc Nat Acad Sci USA and Phys Rev B Condensed Matter.
  2. He, Q.: ¬A study of the strength indexes in co-word analysis (2000) 0.03 
    0.031386513 = product of:
  0.06277303 = sum of:
    0.06277303 = product of:
      0.12554605 = sum of:
        0.12554605 = weight(_text_:q in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12554605 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.43416747 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Sarabia, J.M.; Sarabia, M.: Explicit expressions for the Leimkuhler curve in parametric families (2008) 0.03 
    0.026155427 = product of:
  0.052310854 = sum of:
    0.052310854 = product of:
      0.10462171 = sum of:
        0.10462171 = weight(_text_:q in 2120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10462171 = score(doc=2120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.3618062 = fieldWeight in 2120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2120)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this paper we obtain the Leimkuhler curve in the case of some important statistical distributions proposed in the informetrics and econometrics literature. In this way, we complete the previous work of Burrell [Burrell, Q. L. (2005). Symmetry and other transformation features of Lorenz/Leimkuhler representations of informetric data. Information Processing and Management, 41, 1317-1329], where several open problems were stated. To do this, we use a recent and general definition of the Leimkuhler curve proposed by Sarabia [Sarabia, J. M. (2008a). A general definition of the Leimkuhler curve. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 156-163], and a new representation of the Leimkuhler curve in terms of the first-moment distribution of the population. Specifically, we obtain the Leimkuhler curve of the following distributions: classical and exponentiated Pareto distributions; three-parameter lognormal distribution; generalized gamma distribution, which includes to the exponential and classical gamma distributions among others; generalized beta distribution of the first kind and generalized beta distribution of the second kind, which includes as particular or limiting cases next important families like beta distribution of the second kind, Singh-Maddala, Dagum, Fisk or Lomax distributions. All the obtained Leimkuhler curves can be computed easily.
  4. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02 
    0.023927636 = product of:
  0.047855273 = sum of:
    0.047855273 = product of:
      0.095710546 = sum of:
        0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095710546 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  5. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.021149242 = product of:
  0.042298485 = sum of:
    0.042298485 = product of:
      0.08459697 = sum of:
        0.08459697 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08459697 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  6. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02 
    0.017945727 = product of:
  0.035891455 = sum of:
    0.035891455 = product of:
      0.07178291 = sum of:
        0.07178291 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07178291 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  7. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01 
    0.012689547 = product of:
  0.025379093 = sum of:
    0.025379093 = product of:
      0.050758187 = sum of:
        0.050758187 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050758187 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  8. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.012689547 = product of:
  0.025379093 = sum of:
    0.025379093 = product of:
      0.050758187 = sum of:
        0.050758187 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050758187 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  9. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01 
    0.011963818 = product of:
  0.023927636 = sum of:
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047855273 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  10. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.01 
    0.011963818 = product of:
  0.023927636 = sum of:
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047855273 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
  11. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.01 
    0.010574621 = product of:
  0.021149242 = sum of:
    0.021149242 = product of:
      0.042298485 = sum of:
        0.042298485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042298485 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
  12. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.01 
    0.0104683405 = product of:
  0.020936681 = sum of:
    0.020936681 = product of:
      0.041873362 = sum of:
        0.041873362 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041873362 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  13. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.01 
    0.008972864 = product of:
  0.017945727 = sum of:
    0.017945727 = product of:
      0.035891455 = sum of:
        0.035891455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035891455 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
  14. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01 
    0.008972864 = product of:
  0.017945727 = sum of:
    0.017945727 = product of:
      0.035891455 = sum of:
        0.035891455 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035891455 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  15. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.01 
    0.008972864 = product of:
  0.017945727 = sum of:
    0.017945727 = product of:
      0.035891455 = sum of:
        0.035891455 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035891455 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.008972864 = product of:
  0.017945727 = sum of:
    0.017945727 = product of:
      0.035891455 = sum of:
        0.035891455 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035891455 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  17. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01 
    0.008972864 = product of:
  0.017945727 = sum of:
    0.017945727 = product of:
      0.035891455 = sum of:
        0.035891455 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035891455 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  18. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01 
    0.008972864 = product of:
  0.017945727 = sum of:
    0.017945727 = product of:
      0.035891455 = sum of:
        0.035891455 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035891455 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  19. Althouse, B.M.; West, J.D.; Bergstrom, C.T.; Bergstrom, T.: Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2009) 0.01 
    0.008972864 = product of:
  0.017945727 = sum of:
    0.017945727 = product of:
      0.035891455 = sum of:
        0.035891455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035891455 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    23. 2.2009 18:22:28
  20. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01 
    0.008972864 = product of:
  0.017945727 = sum of:
    0.017945727 = product of:
      0.035891455 = sum of:
        0.035891455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035891455 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04415143 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11

Authors

Languages

  • e 30
  • d 5

Types

  • a 35
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes