-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.06
0.05533268 = product of:
0.11066536 = sum of:
0.11066536 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.09984076 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09984076 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
- Type
- a
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.02
0.022235535 = product of:
0.04447107 = sum of:
0.04447107 = sum of:
0.007030784 = weight(_text_:a in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007030784 = score(doc=4215,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.037440285 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037440285 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
- Type
- a
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.02
0.022235535 = product of:
0.04447107 = sum of:
0.04447107 = sum of:
0.007030784 = weight(_text_:a in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007030784 = score(doc=3692,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.037440285 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037440285 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to examine the patterns of self citation in 6 disciplines distributed among the physical and social sciences and humanities. Sample articles were examined to deermine the relative numbers and ages of self citations and citations to other in the bibliographies and to the exposure given to each type of citation in the text of the articles. significant differences were found in the number and age of citations between disciplines. Overall, 9% of all citations were self citations; 15% of physical sciences citations were self citations, as opposed to 6% in the social sciences and 3% in the humanities. Within disciplines, there was no significantly different amount of coverage between self citations and citations to others. Overall, it appears that a lack of substantive differences in self citation behaviour is consistent across disciplines
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
- Type
- a
-
McCain, K.W.: Mapping authors in intellectual space : a technical overview (1990)
0.00
0.003827074 = product of:
0.007654148 = sum of:
0.007654148 = product of:
0.015308296 = sum of:
0.015308296 = weight(_text_:a in 6903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015308296 = score(doc=6903,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 6903, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Fujigaki, Y.: ¬The citation system : citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous re-evaluation, and as persistent knowledge accumulation (1998)
0.00
0.0035799001 = product of:
0.0071598003 = sum of:
0.0071598003 = product of:
0.014319601 = sum of:
0.014319601 = weight(_text_:a in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014319601 = score(doc=5129,freq=14.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- States that it can be shown that claims of a lack of theories of citation are also indicative of a great need for a theory which links science dynamics and measurement. There is a wide gap between qualitative (science dynamics) and quantitative (measurement) approaches. To link them, proposes the use of the citation system, that potentially bridges a gap between measurement and epistemology, by applying system theory to the publication system
- Footnote
- Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?'
- Type
- a
-
Bayer, A.E.; Smart, J.C.; McLaughlin, G.W.: Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations (1990)
0.00
0.00334869 = product of:
0.00669738 = sum of:
0.00669738 = product of:
0.01339476 = sum of:
0.01339476 = weight(_text_:a in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01339476 = score(doc=338,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Sen, B.K.; Pandalai, T.A.; Karanjai, A.: Ranking of scientists - a new approach (1998)
0.00
0.0033143433 = product of:
0.0066286866 = sum of:
0.0066286866 = product of:
0.013257373 = sum of:
0.013257373 = weight(_text_:a in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013257373 = score(doc=5113,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A formula for the ranking of scientists based on diachronous citation counts is proposed. The paper generalises the fact that the citation generation potential (CGP) is not the same for all papers, it differs from paper to paper, and also to a certain extent depends on the subject domain of the papers. The method of ranking proposed in no way replaces peer review. It merely acts as an aid for peers to help them arrive at a better judgement.
- Type
- a
-
Yoon, L.L.: ¬The performance of cited references as an approach to information retrieval (1994)
0.00
0.0031324127 = product of:
0.0062648254 = sum of:
0.0062648254 = product of:
0.012529651 = sum of:
0.012529651 = weight(_text_:a in 8219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012529651 = score(doc=8219,freq=14.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 8219, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8219)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Explores the relationship between the number of cited references used in a citation search and retrieval effectiveness. Focuses on analysing in terms of information retrieval effectiveness, the overlap among posting sets retrieved by various combinations of cited references. Findings from three case studies show the more cited references used for a citation search, the better the performance, in terms of retrieving more relevant documents, up to a point of diminishing returns. The overall level of overlap among relevant documents sets was found to be low. If only some of the cited references among many candidates are used for a citation search, a significant proportion of relevant documents may be missed. The characteristics of cited references showed that some variables are good indicators to predict relevance to a given question
- Type
- a
-
Kostoff, R.N.: ¬The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation (1998)
0.00
0.0030255679 = product of:
0.0060511357 = sum of:
0.0060511357 = product of:
0.012102271 = sum of:
0.012102271 = weight(_text_:a in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012102271 = score(doc=4129,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Leydesdorff, in his 1998 paper 'Theories of citation?', addresses the history of citations and citation analysis, and the transformation of a reference mechanism into a purportedly quantitative measure of research impact/quality. Examines different facets of citations and citation analysis, and discusses the validity of citation analysis as a useful measure of research impact/quality
- Footnote
- Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?'
- Type
- a
-
Harter, S.P.; Nisonger, T.E.; Weng, A.: Semantic relationsships between cited and citing articles in library and information science journals (1993)
0.00
0.0029294936 = product of:
0.005858987 = sum of:
0.005858987 = product of:
0.011717974 = sum of:
0.011717974 = weight(_text_:a in 5644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011717974 = score(doc=5644,freq=24.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 5644, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The act of referencing another author's work in a scholarly or research paper is usually assumed to signal a direct semantic relationship between the citing and cited work. The present article reports a study that examines this assumption directly. The purpose of the research is to investigate the semantic relationship between citing and cited documents for a sample of document pairs in three journals in library and information science: 'Library journal', 'College and research libraries' and 'Journal of the American Society for Information Science'. A macroanalysis, absed on a comparison of the Library of Congress class numbers assigned citing and cited documents, and a microanalysis, based on a comparison of descriptors assigned citing and cited documents by three indexing and abstracting journals, ERIC, LISA and LiLi, were conducted. Both analyses suggest that the subject similarity among pairs of cited and citing documents is typically very small, supporting a subjective, psychological view of relevance and a trial-and-error, heuristic understanding of the information search and research processes. The results of the study have implications for collection development, for an understanding of psychological relevance, and for the results of doing information retrieval using cited references. Several intriguing methodological questions are raised for future research, including the role of indexing depth, specifity, and quality on the measurement of document similarity
- Type
- a
-
Pichappan, P.: Levels of citation relation between papers (1996)
0.00
0.0029294936 = product of:
0.005858987 = sum of:
0.005858987 = product of:
0.011717974 = sum of:
0.011717974 = weight(_text_:a in 5725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011717974 = score(doc=5725,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 5725, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5725)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Proposes a typology for measuring the levels of citation relations netween papers. Introduces a new family of citation based classification schemes and outlines the typology that can be seen as being analogous to Ranganathan's APUPA pattern in subject mapping
- Type
- a
-
Magri, M.; Solari, A.: ¬The SCI Journal Citation Reports : a potential tool for studying journals? (1996)
0.00
0.0029000505 = product of:
0.005800101 = sum of:
0.005800101 = product of:
0.011600202 = sum of:
0.011600202 = weight(_text_:a in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011600202 = score(doc=5076,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Analyses 6 indicators of the Science Citation Index Journals Citation Reports over a 19 year period: number of total citations, number of citations to the previous 2 years, number of source items, impact factor, immediacy index and cited half life. Proposes a box plot method to aggregate the values of each indicator so as to obtain at a glance portrayals of the JCR population from 1974 to 1993. This 'rereading' of the JCR, which presents the JCR product differently, makes it possible to shed new light on the large sub population of journals not at the top of the rankings
- Type
- a
-
Octavio, A.: ¬The '¬indexed' theorem (1996)
0.00
0.0028703054 = product of:
0.005740611 = sum of:
0.005740611 = product of:
0.011481222 = sum of:
0.011481222 = weight(_text_:a in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011481222 = score(doc=377,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Gorraiz, J.: ¬Die unerträgliche Bedeutung der Zitate (1992)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Huber, C.: Web of science (1999)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
McCain, K.W.: Core journal networks and and cocitation maps (1991)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 6904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=6904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Alvarez, P.; Pulgarin, A.: ¬The Rasch model : measuring the impact of scientific journals: analytical chemistry (1996)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 8505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=8505,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 8505, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8505)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Focuses on a way to determine a ranking of science journals according to the number of citations-to and items-published data used by Science Citation Insitute of Citation Reports of the Institute for Science Information to determine journal ranking by impact factor. Applies latent traits theory to bibliometrics
- Type
- a
-
Garfield, E.: Long-term vs. short-term journal impact : does it matter? (1998)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Kostoff, R.N.: Citation analysis cross field normalization : a new paradigm (1997)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=464,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Proposes a new paradigm for comparing quality of published papers across different disciplines. This method uses a figure of merit of the ratio of actual citations received to the potential maximum number of citations that could have been received. It is analogous to approaches used to compare performance in physical systems, and appears intrinsically more useful than present approaches
- Type
- a
-
Garfield, E.: How ISI selects journals for coverage : quantitative and qualitative considerations (1990)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=1153,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
