Search (6580 results, page 1 of 329)

  1. Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023) 0.31 
    0.30628926 = sum of:
  0.18495546 = product of:
    0.36991093 = sum of:
      0.14513373 = weight(_text_:authors in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14513373 = score(doc=886,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2772679 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
      0.22477719 = weight(_text_:2023 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22477719 = score(doc=886,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.622394 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
    0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.12133381 = sum of:
    0.07189204 = weight(_text_:x in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07189204 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2568243 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06082018 = queryNorm
        0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
    0.049441766 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049441766 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06082018 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
    Abstract
    Ensuring Wikipedia cites scholarly publications based on quality and relevancy without biases is critical to credible and fair knowledge dissemination. We investigate gender- and country-based biases in Wikipedia citation practices using linked data from the Web of Science and a Wikipedia citation dataset. Using coarsened exact matching, we show that publications by women are cited less by Wikipedia than expected, and publications by women are less likely to be cited than those by men. Scholarly publications by authors affiliated with non-Anglosphere countries are also disadvantaged in getting cited by Wikipedia, compared with those by authors affiliated with Anglosphere countries. The level of gender- or country-based inequalities varies by research field, and the gender-country intersectional bias is prominent in math-intensive STEM fields. To ensure the credibility and equality of knowledge presentation, Wikipedia should consider strategies and guidelines to cite scholarly publications independent of the gender and country of authors.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:53:32
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.219-233
    Year
    2023
  2. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.22 
    0.21678989 = sum of:
  0.14489785 = product of:
    0.5795914 = sum of:
      0.5795914 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.5795914 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5156342 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.07189204 = product of:
    0.14378408 = sum of:
      0.14378408 = weight(_text_:x in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14378408 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2568243 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.55985385 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
    Type
    x
  3. Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023) 0.20 
    0.19636008 = sum of:
  0.1716392 = product of:
    0.3432784 = sum of:
      0.1185012 = weight(_text_:authors in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1185012 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2772679 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
      0.22477719 = weight(_text_:2023 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22477719 = score(doc=918,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.622394 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
    0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.024720883 = product of:
    0.049441766 = sum of:
      0.049441766 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049441766 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:14
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.415-433
    Year
    2023
  4. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.19 
    0.1888021 = sum of:
  0.13112003 = product of:
    0.5244801 = sum of:
      0.5244801 = weight(_text_:2023 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.5244801 = score(doc=1079,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          1.4522527 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.057682063 = product of:
    0.11536413 = sum of:
      0.11536413 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11536413 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
    Source
    Pirmasenser Zeitung. 2023 vom 27.01.2023, S.1
    Year
    2023
  5. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.18 
    0.18116876 = sum of:
  0.16056803 = product of:
    0.32113606 = sum of:
      0.069827504 = weight(_text_:authors in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.069827504 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2772679 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
      0.25130856 = weight(_text_:2023 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25130856 = score(doc=1125,freq=9.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.6958577 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
            3.0 = tf(freq=9.0), with freq of:
              9.0 = termFreq=9.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
    0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.020600738 = product of:
    0.041201476 = sum of:
      0.041201476 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041201476 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2023-3/ko-knowledge-organization-jahrgang-50-2023-heft-3.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 50(2023) no.3, S.227 - 241
    Year
    2023
  6. Zhang, X.; Wang, D.; Tang, Y.; Xiao, Q.: How question type influences knowledge withholding in social Q&A community (2023) 0.18 
    0.17752811 = sum of:
  0.056194298 = product of:
    0.22477719 = sum of:
      0.22477719 = weight(_text_:2023 in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22477719 = score(doc=1067,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.622394 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.12133381 = sum of:
    0.07189204 = weight(_text_:x in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07189204 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2568243 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06082018 = queryNorm
        0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
    0.049441766 = weight(_text_:22 in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049441766 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06082018 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
    Date
    22. 9.2023 13:51:47
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.10, S.1170-1184
    Year
    2023
  7. Boni, M.: Internet für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftler (1996) 0.17 
    0.16680163 = sum of:
  0.082927585 = product of:
    0.33171034 = sum of:
      0.33171034 = weight(_text_:2023 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.33171034 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.9184852 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.08387405 = product of:
    0.1677481 = sum of:
      0.1677481 = weight(_text_:x in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1677481 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2568243 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.65316284 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Isbn
    3-8006-2023-5
    Pages
    X,179 S
  8. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.16 
    0.1636334 = sum of:
  0.14303267 = product of:
    0.28606534 = sum of:
      0.09875101 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09875101 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2772679 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.18731432 = weight(_text_:2023 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18731432 = score(doc=883,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.5186617 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.020600738 = product of:
    0.041201476 = sum of:
      0.041201476 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041201476 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.168-185
    Year
    2023
  9. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.16 
    0.1636334 = sum of:
  0.14303267 = product of:
    0.28606534 = sum of:
      0.09875101 = weight(_text_:authors in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09875101 = score(doc=950,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2772679 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
      0.18731432 = weight(_text_:2023 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18731432 = score(doc=950,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.5186617 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
    0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.020600738 = product of:
    0.041201476 = sum of:
      0.041201476 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041201476 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 79(2023) no.1, S.144-159
    Year
    2023
  10. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.16 
    0.16183037 = sum of:
  0.112388596 = product of:
    0.44955438 = sum of:
      0.44955438 = weight(_text_:2023 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.44955438 = score(doc=1203,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          1.244788 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.049441766 = product of:
    0.09888353 = sum of:
      0.09888353 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09888353 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
    Year
    2023
  11. Stünkel, M.: Neuere Methoden der inhaltlichen Erschließung schöner Literatur in öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.16 
    0.16177842 = product of:
  0.32355684 = sum of:
    0.32355684 = sum of:
      0.19171211 = weight(_text_:x in 5815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19171211 = score(doc=5815,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2568243 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.7464718 = fieldWeight in 5815, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5815)
      0.13184471 = weight(_text_:22 in 5815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13184471 = score(doc=5815,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5815, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5815)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 8.2006 21:35:22
    Type
    x
  12. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.16 
    0.15752769 = product of:
  0.31505537 = sum of:
    0.31505537 = sum of:
      0.14378408 = weight(_text_:x in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14378408 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2568243 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.55985385 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.17127131 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17127131 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22
  13. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.15 
    0.1547222 = product of:
  0.3094444 = sum of:
    0.3094444 = product of:
      0.6188888 = sum of:
        0.24149643 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24149643 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5156342 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06082018 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.37739235 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37739235 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.644589 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06082018 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  14. Eyert, F.: Mathematische Wissenschaftskommunikation in der digitalen Gesellschaft (2023) 0.15 
    0.15201813 = sum of:
  0.11081665 = product of:
    0.4432666 = sum of:
      0.4432666 = weight(_text_:2023 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.4432666 = score(doc=1001,freq=7.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          1.2273775 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
            2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
              7.0 = termFreq=7.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.041201476 = product of:
    0.08240295 = sum of:
      0.08240295 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08240295 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: DOI 10.1515/dmvm-2023-0009.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25
    Year
    2023
  15. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.15 
    0.14917165 = sum of:
  0.12857091 = product of:
    0.25714183 = sum of:
      0.069827504 = weight(_text_:authors in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.069827504 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2772679 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
      0.18731432 = weight(_text_:2023 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18731432 = score(doc=995,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.5186617 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
    0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.020600738 = product of:
    0.041201476 = sum of:
      0.041201476 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041201476 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Collaboration is encouraged because it is believed to improve academic research, supported by indirect evidence in the form of more coauthored articles being more cited. Nevertheless, this might not reflect quality but increased self-citations or the "audience effect": citations from increased awareness through multiple author networks. We address this with the first science wide investigation into whether author numbers associate with journal article quality, using expert peer quality judgments for 122,331 articles from the 2014-20 UK national assessment. Spearman correlations between author numbers and quality scores show moderately strong positive associations (0.2-0.4) in the health, life, and physical sciences, but weak or no positive associations in engineering and social sciences, with weak negative/positive or no associations in various arts and humanities, and a possible negative association for decision sciences. This gives the first systematic evidence that greater numbers of authors associates with higher quality journal articles in the majority of academia outside the arts and humanities, at least for the UK. Positive associations between team size and citation counts in areas with little association between team size and quality also show that audience effects or other nonquality factors account for the higher citation rates of coauthored articles in some fields.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:11:50
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.791-810
    Year
    2023
  16. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.15 
    0.14917165 = sum of:
  0.12857091 = product of:
    0.25714183 = sum of:
      0.069827504 = weight(_text_:authors in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.069827504 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2772679 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.18731432 = weight(_text_:2023 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18731432 = score(doc=998,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.5186617 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
    0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.020600738 = product of:
    0.041201476 = sum of:
      0.041201476 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041201476 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.811-827
    Year
    2023
  17. Liu, X.; Bu, Y.; Li, M.; Li, J.: Monodisciplinary collaboration disrupts science more than multidisciplinary collaboration (2024) 0.15 
    0.14892331 = sum of:
  0.11297729 = product of:
    0.22595458 = sum of:
      0.083793 = weight(_text_:authors in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083793 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2772679 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.14216158 = weight(_text_:2023 in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14216158 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.39363652 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
    0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.03594602 = product of:
    0.07189204 = sum of:
      0.07189204 = weight(_text_:x in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07189204 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2568243 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Collaboration across disciplines is a critical form of scientific collaboration to solve complex problems and make innovative contributions. This study focuses on the association between multidisciplinary collaboration measured by coauthorship in publications and the disruption of publications measured by the Disruption (D) index. We used authors' affiliations as a proxy of the disciplines to which they belong and categorized an article into multidisciplinary collaboration or monodisciplinary collaboration. The D index quantifies the extent to which a study disrupts its predecessors. We selected 13 journals that publish articles in six disciplines from the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) database and then constructed regression models with fixed effects and estimated the relationship between the variables. The findings show that articles with monodisciplinary collaboration are more disruptive than those with multidisciplinary collaboration. Furthermore, we uncovered the mechanism of how monodisciplinary collaboration disrupts science more than multidisciplinary collaboration by exploring the references of the sampled publications.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 75(2023) no.1, S.59-78
  18. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.15 
    0.14841393 = sum of:
  0.0302362 = product of:
    0.1209448 = sum of:
      0.1209448 = weight(_text_:authors in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1209448 = score(doc=2590,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2772679 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.11817772 = sum of:
    0.059910037 = weight(_text_:x in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059910037 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2568243 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06082018 = queryNorm
        0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.058267683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058267683 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06082018 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  19. Guo, T.; Bai, X.; Zhen, S.; Abid, S.; Xia, F.: Lost at starting line : predicting maladaptation of university freshmen based on educational big data (2023) 0.15 
    0.1479401 = sum of:
  0.04682858 = product of:
    0.18731432 = sum of:
      0.18731432 = weight(_text_:2023 in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18731432 = score(doc=1194,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.36114934 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.5186617 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            5.9379854 = idf(docFreq=316, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.10111152 = sum of:
    0.059910037 = weight(_text_:x in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059910037 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2568243 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06082018 = queryNorm
        0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
    0.041201476 = weight(_text_:22 in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041201476 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06082018 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
    Date
    27.12.2022 18:34:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.1, S.17-32
    Year
    2023
  20. Dennett, D.C.: Philosophie des menschlichen Bewußtseins (1994) 0.14 
    0.14181326 = product of:
  0.28362653 = sum of:
    0.28362653 = sum of:
      0.14378408 = weight(_text_:x in 3166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14378408 = score(doc=3166,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2568243 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.55985385 = fieldWeight in 3166, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3166)
      0.13984245 = weight(_text_:22 in 3166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13984245 = score(doc=3166,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21298191 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06082018 = queryNorm
          0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3166, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3166)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:22:32
    Isbn
    3-455-08446-X

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications