Search (38342 results, page 1 of 1918)

  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.16
    0.16130002 = sum of:
      0.15833093 = product of:
        0.47499278 = sum of:
          0.18534681 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18534681 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3957456 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.28964597 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.28964597 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.49471754 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
      0.0029690794 = product of:
        0.005938159 = sum of:
          0.005938159 = weight(_text_:a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005938159 = score(doc=692,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    What is the difference between Piaget's constructivism and Papert's "constructionism"? Beyond the mere play on the words, I think the distinction holds, and that integrating both views can enrich our understanding of how people learn and grow. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. The theory describes how children's ways of doing and thinking evolve over time, and under which circumstance children are more likely to let go of-or hold onto- their currently held views. Piaget suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they're wrong. Papert's constructionism, in contrast, focuses more on the art of learning, or 'learning to learn', and on the significance of making things in learning. Papert is interested in how learners engage in a conversation with [their own or other people's] artifacts, and how these conversations boost self-directed learning, and ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge. He stresses the importance of tools, media, and context in human development. Integrating both perspectives illuminates the processes by which individuals come to make sense of their experience, gradually optimizing their interactions with the world.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
    Type
    a
  2. Neunzert, H.: Mathematische Modellierung : ein "curriculum vitae" (2012) 0.14
    0.14281152 = sum of:
      0.13869745 = product of:
        0.8321846 = sum of:
          0.8321846 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.8321846 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.45516646 = queryWeight, product of:
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              1.8283083 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.004114077 = product of:
        0.008228154 = sum of:
          0.008228154 = weight(_text_:a in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008228154 = score(doc=2255,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag auf der Tagung "Geschichte und Modellierung", Jena, 3. Februar 2012. Vgl. unter: http://www.fmi.uni-jena.de/Fakult%C3%A4t/Institute+und+Abteilungen/Abteilung+f%C3%BCr+Didaktik/Kolloquien.html?highlight=neunzert.
    Type
    a
  3. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.14
    0.14074323 = sum of:
      0.028582461 = product of:
        0.17149477 = sum of:
          0.17149477 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17149477 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21280116 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.112160765 = sum of:
        0.010970871 = weight(_text_:a in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010970871 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.1011899 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1011899 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  4. Parker, D.; Gow, E.; Lim, E.: AARLIN : seamless information delivery to researchers (2002) 0.13
    0.13497604 = sum of:
      0.12953363 = product of:
        0.7772018 = sum of:
          0.7772018 = weight(_text_:aarlin in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.7772018 = score(doc=3602,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.49471754 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              1.571001 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.005442412 = product of:
        0.010884824 = sum of:
          0.010884824 = weight(_text_:a in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010884824 = score(doc=3602,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Australian Academic Research Library Information Network (AARLIN) aims to provide seamless access to Australian and international information resources for researchers via their personal computers through a personally customisable portal. The project has funding from the Australian Govemment. AARLIN commenced in the year 2000 with a pilot project and will develop into a fully operational service in Australian universities over the next three years. During the pilot project Ex Libris' Metalib and SFX software have been used to trial the AARLIN portal concept with a group of researchers. The results of a survey of the researchers are presented. It is concluded that the portal has the potential to enhance the work of researchers by improving their success in information searching.
    Object
    AARLIN
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
    Type
    a
  5. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.13
    0.13406867 = sum of:
      0.06467274 = product of:
        0.19401821 = sum of:
          0.075028956 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.075028956 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21280116 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
          0.11898926 = weight(_text_:21st in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11898926 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.44401163 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
        0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
      0.06939594 = sum of:
        0.006787881 = weight(_text_:a in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006787881 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
        0.062608056 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062608056 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  6. Sieglerschmidt, J.: Wissensordnungen im analogen und im digitalen Zeitalter (2017) 0.13
    0.13350792 = sum of:
      0.1307652 = product of:
        0.7845912 = sum of:
          0.7845912 = weight(_text_:c3 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.7845912 = score(doc=4026,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.45516646 = queryWeight, product of:
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              1.7237456 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.0027427177 = product of:
        0.0054854355 = sum of:
          0.0054854355 = weight(_text_:a in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0054854355 = score(doc=4026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=0rtGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA35&dq=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung+OR+sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&ots=5u0TwCbFqE&sig=GGw3Coc21CINkone-6Lx8LaSAjY#v=onepage&q=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung%20OR%20sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&f=false.
    Type
    a
  7. Salaba, A.; Zeng, M.L.: Extending the "Explore" user task beyond subject authority data into the linked data sphere (2014) 0.12
    0.11725674 = sum of:
      0.06467274 = product of:
        0.19401821 = sum of:
          0.075028956 = weight(_text_:authors in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.075028956 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21280116 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
          0.11898926 = weight(_text_:21st in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11898926 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.44401163 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
        0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
      0.052584 = sum of:
        0.008313422 = weight(_text_:a in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008313422 = score(doc=1465,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
        0.04427058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04427058 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
    
    Abstract
    "Explore" is a user task introduced in the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. Through various case scenarios, the authors discuss how structured data, presented based on Linked Data principles and using knowledge organisation systems (KOS) as the backbone, extend the explore task within and beyond subject authority data.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  8. Simmonds, A.: ¬The 21st century ISBN (1997) 0.10
    0.10345078 = sum of:
      0.028330779 = product of:
        0.16998467 = sum of:
          0.16998467 = weight(_text_:21st in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16998467 = score(doc=1705,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.6343024 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.07512 = sum of:
        0.011876318 = weight(_text_:a in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011876318 = score(doc=1705,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
        0.06324369 = weight(_text_:22 in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06324369 = score(doc=1705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
    
    Abstract
    The Digital Object Identifier (DOI) system, launched in Oct 97, is a system for executing various processes on the Internet. Explains how it works and what it can do and discusses governance of the system warning of the need for wider investigation
    Source
    Bookseller. 1997, no.4798, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  9. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.10
    0.10257934 = sum of:
      0.05543378 = product of:
        0.16630134 = sum of:
          0.064310536 = weight(_text_:authors in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064310536 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21280116 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.1019908 = weight(_text_:21st in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1019908 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.3805814 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
      0.047145564 = sum of:
        0.009199356 = weight(_text_:a in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009199356 = score(doc=1428,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.03794621 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03794621 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  10. Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014) 0.10
    0.10160814 = sum of:
      0.05543378 = product of:
        0.16630134 = sum of:
          0.064310536 = weight(_text_:authors in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064310536 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21280116 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
          0.1019908 = weight(_text_:21st in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1019908 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.3805814 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
        0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
      0.046174362 = sum of:
        0.008228154 = weight(_text_:a in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008228154 = score(doc=1464,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
        0.03794621 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03794621 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
    
    Abstract
    This paper attempts to explore an approach of using an automatic semantic analysis tool to enhance the "subject" access to materials that are not included in the usual library subject cataloging process. Using two research samples the authors analyzed the access points supplied by OpenCalais, a semantic analysis tool. As an aid in understanding how computerized subject analysis might be approached, this paper suggests using the three-layer framework that has been accepted and applied in image analysis, developed by Erwin Panofsky.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  11. Burghardt, M.; Hertlein, F.; Hinterleitner, B.; Lehenmeier, C.; Spröd, T.: ¬A crowdsourced approach for the documentation and transcription of graffiti in public restrooms (2015) 0.10
    0.10127144 = sum of:
      0.028330779 = product of:
        0.16998467 = sum of:
          0.16998467 = weight(_text_:21st in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16998467 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.6343024 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.07294066 = sum of:
        0.009696973 = weight(_text_:a in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009696973 = score(doc=2991,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
        0.06324369 = weight(_text_:22 in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06324369 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
    
    Date
    6. 6.2016 18:42:22
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
    Type
    a
  12. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.10
    0.09843126 = sum of:
      0.028330779 = product of:
        0.16998467 = sum of:
          0.16998467 = weight(_text_:21st in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16998467 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.6343024 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.07010048 = sum of:
        0.006856794 = weight(_text_:a in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006856794 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
        0.06324369 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06324369 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
    
    Abstract
    A discussion on current initiatives regarding terminology registries.
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  13. Dodebei, V.; Orrico, E. Goyannes Dill: Knowledge in social memory : empirical experiment for a domain conceptual-discursive mapping (2014) 0.09
    0.088658206 = sum of:
      0.046194818 = product of:
        0.13858445 = sum of:
          0.053592116 = weight(_text_:authors in 1405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053592116 = score(doc=1405,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21280116 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1405, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1405)
          0.084992334 = weight(_text_:21st in 1405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084992334 = score(doc=1405,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.3171512 = fieldWeight in 1405, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1405)
        0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
      0.04246339 = sum of:
        0.010841544 = weight(_text_:a in 1405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010841544 = score(doc=1405,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 1405, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1405)
        0.031621844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031621844 = score(doc=1405,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1405, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1405)
    
    Abstract
    Mapping a knowledge domain in the interdisciplinary field of Social Memory is discussed, considering the linguistic materiality and the conceptual relations that are most appropriate to its representation. Theoretical instruments for knowledge organization in the field of information as well as of memory are both central in contemporary social studies and they must help a clear representation of a domain, especially when it lies in disciplinary frontiers. Two perspectives were used as methodological procedures: the conceptual analysis regarding the categorization of the authors' intellectual production selected from syllabus of the discipline Social Memory and Institution; and discursive fragments selected from Paul Ricour's text memory and imagination . As main results, data analysis from the first corpus pointed out six main facets that organize the memory context; and the second corpus, related to discursive materiality, organizes Ricour's ideas of memory from some philosophical points of view. As conclusions, we consider that mapping key concepts and discourses towards the main categories (ontological) and towards a group of relations derived from the discursive analysis process has enabled a possible framework for social memory indexing/searching studies. Even though this proposal is specific to a topic in a teaching program, it indicates a promising path for upcoming studies in Knowledge Organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  14. Kleineberg, M.: Integrative levels of knowing : an organizing principle for the epistemological dimension (2014) 0.09
    0.08621448 = sum of:
      0.046194818 = product of:
        0.13858445 = sum of:
          0.053592116 = weight(_text_:authors in 1407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053592116 = score(doc=1407,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21280116 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1407, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1407)
          0.084992334 = weight(_text_:21st in 1407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084992334 = score(doc=1407,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.3171512 = fieldWeight in 1407, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1407)
        0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
      0.04001967 = sum of:
        0.008397824 = weight(_text_:a in 1407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008397824 = score(doc=1407,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 1407, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1407)
        0.031621844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031621844 = score(doc=1407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1407)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of integrative levels as an organizing principle for knowledge organization has a long history in library and information science. Traditionally, the model of a nested hierarchy in which each higher level transcends and includes the lower levels has been applied to the ontological dimension of human knowledge as "levels of being" in order to provide a basic schema for classifying different kinds of world phenomena. In this paper, a complementary application of the integrative levels concept for the epistemological dimension as "levels of knowing" is proposed. It will be argued that under the condition of epistemic pluralism, knowledge organization theory should take the epistemic frameworks adopted by authors or creators of documents into account such as modes of thought or worldview structures as they emerge and transform in individual development as well as in human history. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to outline the concept of integrative levels of knowing as an or ganizing principle for a classification of viewpoints.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  15. Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Sales, R. de; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Alencar, M.F.: ¬The conceptual dimension of knowledge organization in the ISKO proceedings domain : a Bardinian content analysis (2014) 0.09
    0.08548279 = sum of:
      0.046194818 = product of:
        0.13858445 = sum of:
          0.053592116 = weight(_text_:authors in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053592116 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21280116 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
          0.084992334 = weight(_text_:21st in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084992334 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.3171512 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
        0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
      0.039287973 = sum of:
        0.0076661296 = weight(_text_:a in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076661296 = score(doc=1410,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
        0.031621844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031621844 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
    
    Abstract
    This paper aims to study the conceptual dimension of Knowledge Organization (KO) in the ISKO proceedings (1990-2012) domain. After analyzing a corpus of 71 papers that presented the term "knowledge organization" in their titles, using the methodology of Bardin's content analysis, it was possible to obtain a set of 11 definitions of KO which were studied using the following categories: nature, object, tools, processes, and perspectives/approaches. These categories act as a basis to identify the communities of authors that interact in the domain under different conceptual perspectives. The results show that KO has been mainly understood as an area or field of knowledge whose objects are recorded knowledge and conceptual structures, and whose main processes are classification and indexing, as well as information retrieval. The nature of KO is mostly linked to the construction of specialized discourses and the methodological dimension of such area is related to the systematization of recorded scientific knowledge.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  16. Raghavan, K.S.; Rao, I.K.R.: Facets of facet analysis : a domain analysis (2014) 0.09
    0.08548279 = sum of:
      0.046194818 = product of:
        0.13858445 = sum of:
          0.053592116 = weight(_text_:authors in 1411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053592116 = score(doc=1411,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21280116 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1411, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1411)
          0.084992334 = weight(_text_:21st in 1411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084992334 = score(doc=1411,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.3171512 = fieldWeight in 1411, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1411)
        0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
      0.039287973 = sum of:
        0.0076661296 = weight(_text_:a in 1411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076661296 = score(doc=1411,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 1411, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1411)
        0.031621844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031621844 = score(doc=1411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1411)
    
    Abstract
    Facet analysis is considered the most distinct approach to knowledge organization within LIS. This paper views 'Facet Analysis' as a domain and visualizes its parameters using domain analytic techniques. Over 150 papers on 'Facet Analysis' published since 2008 were identified via a search in Web of Science. The subject terms and other associated metadata of each of the records were taken to represent the different facets of the domain. The basic research question is: what are the facets of facet analysis? The study seeks to graphically represent the contours of the domain. The analysis of the data suggests that while the traditional aspects continue to dominate research in the area, aspects such as Artificial Intelligence, Information Architecture, etc are emerging as new areas of application. The distribution of authors suggests that interest in the area is now by no means confined to India, Europe and North America. There is evidence to suggest that Facet Analysis as a tool is growing in importance.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  17. Alexandre Hannud Abdo, A.H. => Hannud Abdo, A.: 0.08
    0.08412057 = product of:
      0.16824114 = sum of:
        0.16824114 = sum of:
          0.016456308 = weight(_text_:a in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016456308 = score(doc=617,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.30574775 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
          0.15178484 = weight(_text_:22 in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15178484 = score(doc=617,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 6.2022 19:22:19
  18. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.08
    0.08332457 = sum of:
      0.04827433 = product of:
        0.28964597 = sum of:
          0.28964597 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.28964597 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.49471754 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.03505024 = sum of:
        0.003428397 = weight(_text_:a in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003428397 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.031621844 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031621844 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
    Type
    a
  19. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.08324373 = sum of:
      0.03706936 = product of:
        0.22241616 = sum of:
          0.22241616 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22241616 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3957456 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.046174362 = sum of:
        0.008228154 = weight(_text_:a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008228154 = score(doc=562,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.03794621 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03794621 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
    Type
    a
  20. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.08
    0.082760625 = sum of:
      0.022664621 = product of:
        0.13598773 = sum of:
          0.13598773 = weight(_text_:21st in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13598773 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2679868 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04667906 = queryNorm
              0.5074419 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.060096003 = sum of:
        0.009501054 = weight(_text_:a in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009501054 = score(doc=541,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05382315 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
        0.05059495 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05059495 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16346212 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04667906 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
    
    Abstract
    In this presentation, we therefore focus on a solution for providing uniform access to Digital Libraries and other online services. In order to enable uniform query access to heterogeneous sources, we must provide metadata interoperability in a way that a query language - in this case SPARQL - can cope with the incompatibility of the metadata in various sources without changing their already existing information models.
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications