Search (4830 results, page 1 of 242)

0.17144105 = product of:
  0.3428821 = sum of:
    0.3428821 = product of:
      0.6857642 = sum of:
        0.6857642 = weight(_text_:r.r in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6857642 = score(doc=2439,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.9143724 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.17144105 = product of:
  0.3428821 = sum of:
    0.3428821 = product of:
      0.6857642 = sum of:
        0.6857642 = weight(_text_:r.r in 6355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6857642 = score(doc=6355,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.9143724 = fieldWeight in 6355, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=6355)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.17144105 = product of:
  0.3428821 = sum of:
    0.3428821 = product of:
      0.6857642 = sum of:
        0.6857642 = weight(_text_:r.r in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6857642 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.9143724 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.17144105 = product of:
  0.3428821 = sum of:
    0.3428821 = product of:
      0.6857642 = sum of:
        0.6857642 = weight(_text_:r.r in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6857642 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.9143724 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.17144105 = product of:
  0.3428821 = sum of:
    0.3428821 = product of:
      0.6857642 = sum of:
        0.6857642 = weight(_text_:r.r in 879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6857642 = score(doc=879,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.9143724 = fieldWeight in 879, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=879)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.17144105 = product of:
  0.3428821 = sum of:
    0.3428821 = product of:
      0.6857642 = sum of:
        0.6857642 = weight(_text_:r.r in 3619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6857642 = score(doc=3619,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.9143724 = fieldWeight in 3619, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=3619)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.15257742 = sum of:
  0.011393233 = product of:
    0.045572933 = sum of:
      0.045572933 = weight(_text_:authors in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045572933 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22619869 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04961788 = queryNorm
          0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14118418 = sum of:
    0.11429403 = weight(_text_:r.r in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11429403 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04961788 = queryNorm
        0.31906208 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
    0.026890151 = weight(_text_:22 in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026890151 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17375337 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04961788 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)

Abstract

The main objective of this research was to analyze whether there was a characteristic distribution behavior of relevant terms over a scientific text that could contribute as a criterion for their process of automatic indexing. The terms considered in this study were only full noun phrases contained in the texts themselves. The texts were considered a total of 98 doctoral theses of the eight areas of knowledge in a same university. Initially, 20 full noun phrases were automatically extracted from each text as candidates to be the most relevant terms, and each author of each text assigned a relevance value 0-6 (not relevant and highly relevant, respectively) for each of the 20 noun phrases sent. Only, 22.1 % of noun phrases were considered not relevant. A relevance values of the terms assigned by the authors were associated with their positions in the text. Each full noun phrases found in the text was considered as a valid linear position. The results that were obtained showed values resulting from this distribution by considering two types of position: linear, with values consolidated into ten equal consecutive parts; and structural, considering parts of the text (such as introduction, development and conclusion). As a result of considerable importance, all areas of knowledge related to the Natural Sciences showed a characteristic behavior in the distribution of relevant terms, as well as all areas of knowledge related to Social Sciences showed the same characteristic behavior of distribution, but distinct from the Natural Sciences. The difference of the distribution behavior between the Natural and Social Sciences can be clearly visualized through graphs. All behaviors, including the general behavior of all areas of knowledge together, were characterized in polynomial equations and can be applied in future as criteria for automatic indexing. Until the present date this work has become inedited of for two reasons: to present a method for characterizing the distribution of relevant terms in a scientific text, and also, through this method, pointing out a quantitative trait difference between the Natural and Social Sciences.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.14118418 = product of:
  0.28236836 = sum of:
    0.28236836 = sum of:
      0.22858806 = weight(_text_:r.r in 2547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22858806 = score(doc=2547,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04961788 = queryNorm
          0.63812417 = fieldWeight in 2547, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2547)
      0.053780302 = weight(_text_:22 in 2547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053780302 = score(doc=2547,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17375337 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04961788 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2547, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2547)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.12622434 = product of:
  0.25244868 = sum of:
    0.25244868 = product of:
      0.50489736 = sum of:
        0.19701587 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19701587 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.3078815 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3078815 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52586395 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.

0.11994544 = sum of:
  0.019938158 = product of:
    0.07975263 = sum of:
      0.07975263 = weight(_text_:authors in 3523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07975263 = score(doc=3523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22619869 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04961788 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 3523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3523)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.10000728 = product of:
    0.20001456 = sum of:
      0.20001456 = weight(_text_:r.r in 3523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20001456 = score(doc=3523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04961788 = queryNorm
          0.55835867 = fieldWeight in 3523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3523)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This work tries to propose a set of evaluation dimensions for the analysis of the knowledge organization systems (KOS), building over previous research and the available literature on the subject. It presents a compiled taxonomy of KOSs, a set of tentative characteristics proposed in the literature and the authors' spectra proposal. The full details of the typology are not covered in the scope of the article, but will be available as an ontology in the near future.

0.11994544 = sum of:
  0.019938158 = product of:
    0.07975263 = sum of:
      0.07975263 = weight(_text_:authors in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07975263 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22619869 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04961788 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.10000728 = product of:
    0.20001456 = sum of:
      0.20001456 = weight(_text_:r.r in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20001456 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04961788 = queryNorm
          0.55835867 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper analyzes previous work on the classification of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS), discusses strengths and weaknesses, and proposes a new and integrative framework. It argues that current analyses of the KOS tend to be idiosyncratic and incomplete, relying on a limited number of dimensions of analysis. The paper discusses why and how KOS should be classified on a new basis. Based on the available literature and previous work, the authors propose a wider set of dimensions for the analysis of KOS. These are represented in a taxonomy of KOS. Issues arising are discussed.

0.11532101 = sum of:
  0.029600488 = product of:
    0.11840195 = sum of:
      0.11840195 = weight(_text_:authors in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11840195 = score(doc=2638,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.22619869 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04961788 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.085720524 = product of:
    0.17144105 = sum of:
      0.17144105 = weight(_text_:r.r in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17144105 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04961788 = queryNorm
          0.4785931 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Studies the quality of subject indexing by Chemical Abstracts Indexing Service by confronting authors with the particular indexing terms attributed to their computer, for 270 articles published in 54 journals, 5 articles out of each journal. Responses (80%) indicate the superior quality of keywords, both as content descriptors and as retrieval tools. Author judgements on these 2 different aspects do not always converge, however. CAS's indexing policy to cover only 'new' aspects is reflected in author's judgements that index lists are somewhat incomplete, in particular in the case of thesaurus terms (index headings). The large effort expanded by CAS in maintaining and using a subject thesuaurs, in order to select valid index headings, as compared to quick and cheap keyword postings, does not lead to clear superior quality of thesaurus terms for document description nor in retrieval. Some 20% of papers were not placed in 'proper' CA main section, according to authors. As concerns the use of indexing data by third parties, in bibliometrics, users should be aware of the indexing policies behind the data, in order to prevent invalid interpretations

0.11429403 = product of:
  0.22858806 = sum of:
    0.22858806 = product of:
      0.45717612 = sum of:
        0.45717612 = weight(_text_:r.r in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45717612 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.2762483 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.11429403 = product of:
  0.22858806 = sum of:
    0.22858806 = product of:
      0.45717612 = sum of:
        0.45717612 = weight(_text_:r.r in 603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45717612 = score(doc=603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.2762483 = fieldWeight in 603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=603)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.11429403 = product of:
  0.22858806 = sum of:
    0.22858806 = product of:
      0.45717612 = sum of:
        0.45717612 = weight(_text_:r.r in 2602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45717612 = score(doc=2602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.2762483 = fieldWeight in 2602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.11429403 = product of:
  0.22858806 = sum of:
    0.22858806 = product of:
      0.45717612 = sum of:
        0.45717612 = weight(_text_:r.r in 6042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45717612 = score(doc=6042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.2762483 = fieldWeight in 6042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6042)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.11429403 = product of:
  0.22858806 = sum of:
    0.22858806 = product of:
      0.45717612 = sum of:
        0.45717612 = weight(_text_:r.r in 6043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45717612 = score(doc=6043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.2762483 = fieldWeight in 6043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6043)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.11429403 = product of:
  0.22858806 = sum of:
    0.22858806 = product of:
      0.45717612 = sum of:
        0.45717612 = weight(_text_:r.r in 6159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45717612 = score(doc=6159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.2762483 = fieldWeight in 6159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6159)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10000728 = product of:
  0.20001456 = sum of:
    0.20001456 = product of:
      0.40002912 = sum of:
        0.40002912 = weight(_text_:r.r in 1278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40002912 = score(doc=1278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.1167173 = fieldWeight in 1278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1278)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10000728 = product of:
  0.20001456 = sum of:
    0.20001456 = product of:
      0.40002912 = sum of:
        0.40002912 = weight(_text_:r.r in 1984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40002912 = score(doc=1984,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3582188 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04961788 = queryNorm
            1.1167173 = fieldWeight in 1984, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1984)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)