Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.023733135 = product of:
  0.04746627 = sum of:
    0.04746627 = product of:
      0.09493254 = sum of:
        0.09493254 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09493254 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1752617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050048612 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.49-75

0.020342687 = product of:
  0.040685374 = sum of:
    0.040685374 = product of:
      0.08137075 = sum of:
        0.08137075 = weight(_text_:22 in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08137075 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1752617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050048612 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2012 13:17:00

0.011866568 = product of:
  0.023733135 = sum of:
    0.023733135 = product of:
      0.04746627 = sum of:
        0.04746627 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04746627 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1752617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050048612 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27.12.2008 15:56:22

0.011866568 = product of:
  0.023733135 = sum of:
    0.023733135 = product of:
      0.04746627 = sum of:
        0.04746627 = weight(_text_:22 in 638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04746627 = score(doc=638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1752617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050048612 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=638)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.2013 12:09:50

0.005746069 = product of:
  0.011492138 = sum of:
    0.011492138 = product of:
      0.04596855 = sum of:
        0.04596855 = weight(_text_:authors in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04596855 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22816232 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050048612 = queryNorm
            0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Conclusion A scan of this summary indicates that the conference indeed presented a varied program. Overall perhaps there were fewer papers that were precisely focused than those presented at previous conferences. However, collectively the goals focused on theories, tools and methods for improving existing systems or designing alternative approaches. It is inevitable that some topics, such as metadata, permeate the whole conference and have implications for areas of research. Other topics that constantly appear are related to vocabulary and language - ontologies, classification, semantics, etc. Always striking are the papers originating in other disciplines such as nursing and business, whose authors are seeking to use the theories and practices of knowledge organization as models for organization and processes in those disciplines. This is a positive sign demonstrating the potential for generalizing theories and methodologies for knowledge organization to other disciplines. There was one "orphan" paper on library and information science education. True, the theme was global learning, but in a different sense. Another unusual inclusion was three papers dealing with FRBR. One was a report of activities the IFLA Working Group and not research per se, but the other two were on subject authority control, which was more germane to the nature of ISKO conferences. It is inevitable that specific topics become scattered. A precise topic can be dealt with from many points of view, placing papers on the same topic in different categories. There is nothing wrong with this but a good index would counter the scatter and aid readers in use of these proceedings. Nevertheless, despite a few shortcomings this volume is a valuable addition to the research agenda of KO.

0.004309552 = product of:
  0.008619104 = sum of:
    0.008619104 = product of:
      0.034476414 = sum of:
        0.034476414 = weight(_text_:authors in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034476414 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22816232 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050048612 = queryNorm
            0.15110476 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Originally, it was decided that the Dewey Second Summary (100 Divisions) would be a suitable level of access for the bibliography and that the standard DDC organization should be used. In many cases there was a good match between DDC and the former subject categories, in all fields of science and in subjects where literary warrant was high However this was not suitable throughout. Among the areas cited as problems are some of the places where UDC and DDC differ (e.g. the 800s). With respect to music, a deeper level of division than the Dewey outline was needed (specifically in 782 and 784-788 sections on printed and recorded music). In 2002 and 2003 an analysis of the distribution of documents with the 100 Divisions was conducted. Documents were not spread evenly in all classes and while some classes could be merged, others could benefit for the use of more specific numbers. Also, there were discipline based problems, for example in the melding of all branches of engineering. As well, there was a lack of correspondence with modern disciplines such as engineering, electronics, mechanical engineering and environmental technology which had been separate subject categories prior to 2004. Another troublesome discipline was archaeology. Moreover the Second Summary level introduced in 2004 proved to be too broad and would not satisfy users' bibliographic needs. In some cases, in classes containing a variety of topics, subtopics were invisible (e.g. 790 Sports, games and entertainment). As a result, beginning in 2006 the DNB will use full DDC notations. However, the problem would not be insurmountable. The authors concluded that - the cooperation was an interesting are rewarding experience. Ultimately each national - library could adjust and adapt the classification for its own needs and the work done was a good basis for further developments Further, it strengthened support for the German version of DDC to be published in 2006."