Search (4871 results, page 1 of 244)

0.12900126 = product of:
  0.38700375 = sum of:
    0.38700375 = product of:
      0.7740075 = sum of:
        0.7740075 = weight(_text_:m.c in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.7740075 = score(doc=4007,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            2.7338128 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.11782466 = product of:
  0.17673698 = sum of:
    0.03640592 = product of:
      0.109217755 = sum of:
        0.109217755 = weight(_text_:authors in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109217755 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1770479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14033106 = sum of:
      0.114022076 = weight(_text_:m.c in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.114022076 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038836394 = queryNorm
          0.40272865 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
      0.026308976 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026308976 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13599843 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038836394 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.

0.10642061 = product of:
  0.31926182 = sum of:
    0.31926182 = product of:
      0.63852364 = sum of:
        0.63852364 = weight(_text_:m.c in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.63852364 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            2.2552805 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.09121767 = product of:
  0.273653 = sum of:
    0.273653 = product of:
      0.547306 = sum of:
        0.547306 = weight(_text_:m.c in 874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.547306 = score(doc=874,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            1.9330976 = fieldWeight in 874, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=874)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.07484323 = product of:
  0.22452968 = sum of:
    0.22452968 = sum of:
      0.18243532 = weight(_text_:m.c in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18243532 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038836394 = queryNorm
          0.64436585 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
      0.04209436 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04209436 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13599843 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038836394 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 4.1997 21:10:19

0.07443169 = product of:
  0.111647524 = sum of:
    0.051402073 = product of:
      0.15420622 = sum of:
        0.15420622 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15420622 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32925537 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.06024545 = product of:
      0.2409818 = sum of:
        0.2409818 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2409818 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41159877 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.

0.07282801 = product of:
  0.109242015 = sum of:
    0.029426558 = product of:
      0.08827967 = sum of:
        0.08827967 = weight(_text_:authors in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08827967 = score(doc=1142,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1770479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.079815455 = product of:
      0.15963091 = sum of:
        0.15963091 = weight(_text_:m.c in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15963091 = score(doc=1142,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.5638201 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This article outlines the early process and reflects on the experiences of the authors as members of a team creating a Hawaiian knowledge organization system. The authors put forward shared understanding as a process, not a goal, and a way to reimagine and elucidate the process of knowledge organization work. As the project has progressed, team members have embraced their work as not solely knowledge creation and organization, but also communication. The group has identified a metaphorical frame, community agreements, knowledge graphs, and authority record templates as communication tools that are critical to creating a shared space to discuss meaning.

0.07219596 = product of:
  0.10829394 = sum of:
    0.039880693 = product of:
      0.11964207 = sum of:
        0.11964207 = weight(_text_:authors in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11964207 = score(doc=824,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1770479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.67576104 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.06841325 = product of:
      0.1368265 = sum of:
        0.1368265 = weight(_text_:m.c in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1368265 = score(doc=824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.4832744 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This is a study about the relationships between authors and the main thematic categories in the papers published in the last five International ISKO Conferences, held between 2002 and 2010. The aim is to map the domain as ISKO conferences are considered the most representative forum in the field. The published papers are considered to indicate the relationships between authors and themes. The Classification Scheme for Knowledge Organization Literature (CSKOL) was used to categorize the papers. The theoretical and methodological foundations of the study can be found in the concept of domain analysis proposed by Hjørland. The analysis of the papers (n=146) led to the identification of the most productive authors, the networks representing the relationships between the authors as also the categories that constitute the primary areas of research.

0.060811773 = product of:
  0.18243532 = sum of:
    0.18243532 = product of:
      0.36487064 = sum of:
        0.36487064 = weight(_text_:m.c in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36487064 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            1.2887317 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.060811773 = product of:
  0.18243532 = sum of:
    0.18243532 = product of:
      0.36487064 = sum of:
        0.36487064 = weight(_text_:m.c in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36487064 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            1.2887317 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.060811773 = product of:
  0.18243532 = sum of:
    0.18243532 = product of:
      0.36487064 = sum of:
        0.36487064 = weight(_text_:m.c in 6789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36487064 = score(doc=6789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            1.2887317 = fieldWeight in 6789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6789)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.060811773 = product of:
  0.18243532 = sum of:
    0.18243532 = product of:
      0.36487064 = sum of:
        0.36487064 = weight(_text_:m.c in 390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36487064 = score(doc=390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            1.2887317 = fieldWeight in 390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=390)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.05976991 = product of:
  0.08965486 = sum of:
    0.047560498 = product of:
      0.1426815 = sum of:
        0.1426815 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1426815 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1770479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.04209436 = product of:
      0.08418872 = sum of:
        0.08418872 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08418872 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13599843 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Source

OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22

0.057824235 = product of:
  0.08673635 = sum of:
    0.029725311 = product of:
      0.08917593 = sum of:
        0.08917593 = weight(_text_:authors in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08917593 = score(doc=685,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1770479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.057011038 = product of:
      0.114022076 = sum of:
        0.114022076 = weight(_text_:m.c in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114022076 = score(doc=685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.40272865 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

In this article, we show how the Eigenfactor score, originally designed for ranking scholarly journals, can be adapted to rank the scholarly output of authors, institutions, and countries based on author-level citation data. Using the methods described in this article, we provide Eigenfactor rankings for 84,808 disambiguated authors of 240,804 papers in the Social Science Research Network (SSRN)-a preprint and postprint archive devoted to the rapid dissemination of scholarly research in the social sciences and humanities. As an additive metric, the Eigenfactor scores are readily computed for collectives such as departments or institutions as well. We show that a collective's Eigenfactor score can be computed either by summing the Eigenfactor scores of its members or by working directly with a collective-level cross-citation matrix. We provide Eigenfactor rankings for institutions and countries in the SSRN repository. With a network-wide comparison of Eigenfactor scores and download tallies, we demonstrate that Eigenfactor scores provide information that is both different from and complementary to that provided by download counts. We see author-level ranking as one filter for navigating the scholarly literature, and note that such rankings generate incentives for more open scholarship, because authors are rewarded for making their work available to the community as early as possible and before formal publication.

0.057824235 = product of:
  0.08673635 = sum of:
    0.029725311 = product of:
      0.08917593 = sum of:
        0.08917593 = weight(_text_:authors in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08917593 = score(doc=917,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1770479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.057011038 = product of:
      0.114022076 = sum of:
        0.114022076 = weight(_text_:m.c in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114022076 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.40272865 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Coauthorship prediction applies predictive analytics to bibliographic data to predict authors who are highly likely to be coauthors. In this study, we propose an approach for coauthorship prediction based on bibliographic network embedding through a graph-based bibliographic data model that can be used to model common bibliographic data, including papers, terms, sources, authors, departments, research interests, universities, and countries. A real-world dataset released by AMiner that includes more than 2 million papers, 8 million citations, and 1.7 million authors were integrated into a large bibliographic network using the proposed bibliographic data model. Translation-based methods were applied to the entities and relationships to generate their low-dimensional embeddings while preserving their connectivity information in the original bibliographic network. We applied machine learning algorithms to embeddings that represent the coauthorship relationships of the two authors and achieved high prediction results. The reference model, which is the combination of a network embedding size of 100, the most basic translation-based method, and a gradient boosting method achieved an F1 score of 0.9 and even higher scores are obtainable with different embedding sizes and more advanced embedding methods. Thus, the strengths of the proposed approach lie in its customizable components under a unified framework.

0.057697266 = product of:
  0.1730918 = sum of:
    0.1730918 = product of:
      0.6923672 = sum of:
        0.6923672 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6923672 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3786928 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            1.8283083 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vortrag auf der Tagung "Geschichte und Modellierung", Jena, 3. Februar 2012. Vgl. unter: http://www.fmi.uni-jena.de/Fakult%C3%A4t/Institute+und+Abteilungen/Abteilung+f%C3%BCr+Didaktik/Kolloquien.html?highlight=neunzert.

0.057498958 = product of:
  0.086248435 = sum of:
    0.017835187 = product of:
      0.05350556 = sum of:
        0.05350556 = weight(_text_:authors in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05350556 = score(doc=422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1770479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.06841325 = product of:
      0.1368265 = sum of:
        0.1368265 = weight(_text_:m.c in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1368265 = score(doc=422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.4832744 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Metadata and an appropriate metadata model are nontrivial components of information architecture conceptualization and implementation, particularly when disparate and dispersed systems are integrated. Metadata availability can enhance retrieval processes, improve information organization and navigation, and support management of digital objects. To support these activities efficiently, metadata need to be modeled appropriately for the tasks. The authors' work focuses on how to understand and model metadata requirements to support the work of end users of an integrative statistical knowledge network (SKN). They report on a series of user studies. These studies provide an understanding of metadata elements necessary for a variety of user-oriented tasks, related business rules associated with the use of these elements, and their relationship to other perspectives on metadata model development. This work demonstrates the importance of the user perspective in this type of design activity and provides a set of strategies by which the results of user studies can be systematically utilized to support that design.

0.05516928 = product of:
  0.08275392 = sum of:
    0.02574288 = product of:
      0.077228636 = sum of:
        0.077228636 = weight(_text_:authors in 3863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077228636 = score(doc=3863,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1770479 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 3863, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3863)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.057011038 = product of:
      0.114022076 = sum of:
        0.114022076 = weight(_text_:m.c in 3863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114022076 = score(doc=3863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            0.40272865 = fieldWeight in 3863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3863)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Knowledge Organization (KO) theoretical foundations are still being developed in a continuous process of epistemological, theoretical and methodological consolidation. The remarkable growth of scientific records has stimulated the analysis of this production and the creation of instruments to evaluate the behavior of science became indispensable. We propose the Domain Analysis of KO in North America through the citation analysis of North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO) proceedings (2007 - 2015). We present the citation, co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis to visualize and recognize the researchers that influence the scholarly communication in this domain. The most prolific authors through NASKO conferences are Smiraglia, Tennis, Green, Dousa, Grant Campbell, Pimentel, Beak, La Barre, Kipp and Fox. Regarding their theoretical references, Hjørland, Olson, Smiraglia, and Ranganathan are the authors who most inspired the event's studies. The co-citation network shows the highest frequency is between Olson and Mai, followed by Hjørland and Mai and Beghtol and Mai, consolidating Mai and Hjørland as the central authors of the theoretical references in NASKO. The strongest theoretical proximity in author bibliographic coupling network occurs between Fox and Tennis, Dousa and Tennis, Tennis and Smiraglia, Dousa and Beak, and Pimentel and Tennis, highlighting Tennis as central author, that interconnects the others in relation to KO theoretical references in NASKO. The North American chapter has demonstrated a strong scientific production as well as a high level of concern with theoretical and epistemological questions, gathering researchers from different countries, universities and knowledge areas.

0.054397505 = product of:
  0.16319251 = sum of:
    0.16319251 = product of:
      0.65277004 = sum of:
        0.65277004 = weight(_text_:c3 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.65277004 = score(doc=4026,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3786928 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            1.7237456 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vgl. unter: https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=0rtGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA35&dq=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung+OR+sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&ots=5u0TwCbFqE&sig=GGw3Coc21CINkone-6Lx8LaSAjY#v=onepage&q=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung%20OR%20sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&f=false.

0.053210303 = product of:
  0.15963091 = sum of:
    0.15963091 = product of:
      0.31926182 = sum of:
        0.31926182 = weight(_text_:m.c in 4113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31926182 = score(doc=4113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28312382 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038836394 = queryNorm
            1.1276402 = fieldWeight in 4113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)