Search (4841 results, page 1 of 243)

0.23767072 = product of:
  0.47534144 = sum of:
    0.47534144 = sum of:
      0.3809171 = weight(_text_:m.b in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.3809171 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          1.0879309 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
      0.094424345 = weight(_text_:22 in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.094424345 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17432348 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

31. 7.1996 9:22:19

0.20371778 = product of:
  0.40743557 = sum of:
    0.40743557 = sum of:
      0.32650042 = weight(_text_:m.b in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.32650042 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.9325123 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
      0.08093515 = weight(_text_:22 in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08093515 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17432348 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Erwiderung auf: Graham, L.R.: Do mathematical equations display social attributes? in: Mathematical intelligencer 22(2000) no.3, S.31-36

0.19045855 = product of:
  0.3809171 = sum of:
    0.3809171 = product of:
      0.7618342 = sum of:
        0.7618342 = weight(_text_:m.b in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.7618342 = score(doc=26,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049780685 = queryNorm
            2.1758618 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.13604183 = product of:
  0.27208367 = sum of:
    0.27208367 = product of:
      0.54416734 = sum of:
        0.54416734 = weight(_text_:m.b in 5360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.54416734 = score(doc=5360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049780685 = queryNorm
            1.554187 = fieldWeight in 5360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5360)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.13169469 = sum of:
  0.022861231 = product of:
    0.091444924 = sum of:
      0.091444924 = weight(_text_:authors in 3530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.091444924 = score(doc=3530,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22694089 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 3530, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3530)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.10883346 = product of:
    0.21766692 = sum of:
      0.21766692 = weight(_text_:m.b in 3530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21766692 = score(doc=3530,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.62167484 = fieldWeight in 3530, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3530)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The characterization of scholarly communication is dominated by citation-based measures. In this paper we propose several metrics to describe different facets of open access and open research. We discuss measures to represent the public availability of articles along with their archival location, licenses, access costs, and supporting information. Calculations illustrating these new metrics are presented using the authors' publications. We argue that explicit measurement of openness is necessary for a holistic description of research outputs.

0.1266385 = product of:
  0.253277 = sum of:
    0.253277 = product of:
      0.506554 = sum of:
        0.19766232 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19766232 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4220412 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049780685 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.30889168 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30889168 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5275894 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049780685 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.

0.12351861 = sum of:
  0.028289331 = product of:
    0.113157324 = sum of:
      0.113157324 = weight(_text_:authors in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.113157324 = score(doc=1891,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22694089 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.095229276 = product of:
    0.19045855 = sum of:
      0.19045855 = weight(_text_:m.b in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19045855 = score(doc=1891,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Kent State University Libraries' ETD cataloging process features contributions by authors, by the ETDcat application, and by catalogers. Who is doing what, and how much of it is findable in the library catalog? An empirical analysis is performed featuring simple frequencies within the KentLINK catalog, articulated by the use of a newly devised rubric. The researchers sought the degree to which the ETD authors, the applications, and the catalogers can supply accurate, findable metadata. Further development of combinatory cataloging processes is suggested. The method of examining the data and the rubric are provided as a framework for other metadata analysis.

0.119964555 = sum of:
  0.03833945 = product of:
    0.1533578 = sum of:
      0.1533578 = weight(_text_:authors in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1533578 = score(doc=1106,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.22694089 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.67576104 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.081625104 = product of:
    0.16325021 = sum of:
      0.16325021 = weight(_text_:m.b in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16325021 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.46625614 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

For 3 years, the authors of this article and several other colleagues have worked with 11 nonprofit community groups to help them take greater control of their information technology in terms of technology acceptance, adoption, and literacy through a research project. As part of this project, the authors explored informal learning methods that the groups could benefit from and practiced them with the community representatives who played key roles in the daily life of the organizations. In the present article, the authors reflect on the developmental trajectories observed for two individuals, each from a different nonprofit organization, with respect to information technology efficacy and ability. The authors analyze these trajectories as a sequence of the following four technology-related roles-technology consumers, technology planners, technology doers, and technology sustainers. The authors describe these roles, the methods used to promote informal learning, and implications for other researchers studying informal learning in communities.

0.11883536 = product of:
  0.23767072 = sum of:
    0.23767072 = sum of:
      0.19045855 = weight(_text_:m.b in 5122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19045855 = score(doc=5122,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 5122, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5122)
      0.047212172 = weight(_text_:22 in 5122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047212172 = score(doc=5122,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17432348 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5122, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5122)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 3.2019 18:04:22

0.115232855 = sum of:
  0.020003578 = product of:
    0.08001431 = sum of:
      0.08001431 = weight(_text_:authors in 3523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08001431 = score(doc=3523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22694089 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 3523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3523)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.095229276 = product of:
    0.19045855 = sum of:
      0.19045855 = weight(_text_:m.b in 3523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19045855 = score(doc=3523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 3523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3523)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This work tries to propose a set of evaluation dimensions for the analysis of the knowledge organization systems (KOS), building over previous research and the available literature on the subject. It presents a compiled taxonomy of KOSs, a set of tentative characteristics proposed in the literature and the authors' spectra proposal. The full details of the typology are not covered in the scope of the article, but will be available as an ontology in the near future.

0.115232855 = sum of:
  0.020003578 = product of:
    0.08001431 = sum of:
      0.08001431 = weight(_text_:authors in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08001431 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22694089 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.095229276 = product of:
    0.19045855 = sum of:
      0.19045855 = weight(_text_:m.b in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19045855 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper analyzes previous work on the classification of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS), discusses strengths and weaknesses, and proposes a new and integrative framework. It argues that current analyses of the KOS tend to be idiosyncratic and incomplete, relying on a limited number of dimensions of analysis. The paper discusses why and how KOS should be classified on a new basis. Based on the available literature and previous work, the authors propose a wider set of dimensions for the analysis of KOS. These are represented in a taxonomy of KOS. Issues arising are discussed.

0.115232855 = sum of:
  0.020003578 = product of:
    0.08001431 = sum of:
      0.08001431 = weight(_text_:authors in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08001431 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22694089 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.095229276 = product of:
    0.19045855 = sum of:
      0.19045855 = weight(_text_:m.b in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19045855 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article describes in detail the management of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) implementation process by an academic library that was an early adopter of RDA. It identifies the necessary decisions to be made and discusses the rationale behind these decisions during the implementation process. This information can benefit other libraries with managing their local RDA implementations. The authors examine the business case behind implementation from various perspectives such as administrative support, training, documentation, establishment of local procedures and costs. It aims to help cataloging/technical services/metadata managers understand the scope of the process and the impact it will have on their libraries.

0.10883346 = product of:
  0.21766692 = sum of:
    0.21766692 = product of:
      0.43533385 = sum of:
        0.43533385 = weight(_text_:m.b in 2940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43533385 = score(doc=2940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049780685 = queryNorm
            1.2433497 = fieldWeight in 2940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10883346 = product of:
  0.21766692 = sum of:
    0.21766692 = product of:
      0.43533385 = sum of:
        0.43533385 = weight(_text_:m.b in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43533385 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049780685 = queryNorm
            1.2433497 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10883346 = product of:
  0.21766692 = sum of:
    0.21766692 = product of:
      0.43533385 = sum of:
        0.43533385 = weight(_text_:m.b in 3930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43533385 = score(doc=3930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049780685 = queryNorm
            1.2433497 = fieldWeight in 3930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3930)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10883346 = product of:
  0.21766692 = sum of:
    0.21766692 = product of:
      0.43533385 = sum of:
        0.43533385 = weight(_text_:m.b in 5338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43533385 = score(doc=5338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049780685 = queryNorm
            1.2433497 = fieldWeight in 5338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5338)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10883346 = product of:
  0.21766692 = sum of:
    0.21766692 = product of:
      0.43533385 = sum of:
        0.43533385 = weight(_text_:m.b in 5551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43533385 = score(doc=5551,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049780685 = queryNorm
            1.2433497 = fieldWeight in 5551, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5551)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10883346 = product of:
  0.21766692 = sum of:
    0.21766692 = product of:
      0.43533385 = sum of:
        0.43533385 = weight(_text_:m.b in 6225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43533385 = score(doc=6225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049780685 = queryNorm
            1.2433497 = fieldWeight in 6225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6225)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10185889 = product of:
  0.20371778 = sum of:
    0.20371778 = sum of:
      0.16325021 = weight(_text_:m.b in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16325021 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35012987 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.46625614 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
      0.040467575 = weight(_text_:22 in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040467575 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17432348 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

7. 5.2016 20:05:22

0.09967923 = sum of:
  0.045722462 = product of:
    0.18288985 = sum of:
      0.18288985 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18288985 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22694089 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.053956766 = product of:
    0.10791353 = sum of:
      0.10791353 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10791353 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17432348 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049780685 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22