Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × author_ss:"Vakkari, P."
  1. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.03
    0.03108418 = sum of:
      0.01425819 = product of:
        0.05703276 = sum of:
          0.05703276 = weight(_text_:authors in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05703276 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22646311 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04967588 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01682599 = product of:
        0.03365198 = sum of:
          0.03365198 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03365198 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17395647 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04967588 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
  2. Tuomaala, O.; Järvelin, K.; Vakkari, P.: Evolution of library and information science, 1965-2005 : content analysis of journal articles (2014) 0.01
    0.007129095 = product of:
      0.01425819 = sum of:
        0.01425819 = product of:
          0.05703276 = sum of:
            0.05703276 = weight(_text_:authors in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05703276 = score(doc=1309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22646311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04967588 = queryNorm
                0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article first analyzes library and information science (LIS) research articles published in core LIS journals in 2005. It also examines the development of LIS from 1965 to 2005 in light of comparable data sets for 1965, 1985, and 2005. In both cases, the authors report (a) how the research articles are distributed by topic and (b) what approaches, research strategies, and methods were applied in the articles. In 2005, the largest research areas in LIS by this measure were information storage and retrieval, scientific communication, library and information-service activities, and information seeking. The same research areas constituted the quantitative core of LIS in the previous years since 1965. Information retrieval has been the most popular area of research over the years. The proportion of research on library and information-service activities decreased after 1985, but the popularity of information seeking and of scientific communication grew during the period studied. The viewpoint of research has shifted from library and information organizations to end users and development of systems for the latter. The proportion of empirical research strategies was high and rose over time, with the survey method being the single most important method. However, attention to evaluation and experiments increased considerably after 1985. Conceptual research strategies and system analysis, description, and design were quite popular, but declining. The most significant changes from 1965 to 2005 are the decreasing interest in library and information-service activities and the growth of research into information seeking and scientific communication.