Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Crestani, F."
  1. Crestani, F.; Du, H.: Written versus spoken queries : a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis (2006) 0.04
    0.039127383 = sum of:
      0.017947575 = product of:
        0.0717903 = sum of:
          0.0717903 = weight(_text_:authors in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0717903 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021179808 = product of:
        0.042359617 = sum of:
          0.042359617 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042359617 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors report on an experimental study on the differences between spoken and written queries. A set of written and spontaneous spoken queries are generated by users from written topics. These two sets of queries are compared in qualitative terms and in terms of their retrieval effectiveness. Written and spoken queries are compared in terms of length, duration, and part of speech. In addition, assuming perfect transcription of the spoken queries, written and spoken queries are compared in terms of their aptitude to describe relevant documents. The retrieval effectiveness of spoken and written queries is compared using three different information retrieval models. The results show that using speech to formulate one's information need provides a way to express it more naturally and encourages the formulation of longer queries. Despite that, longer spoken queries do not seem to significantly improve retrieval effectiveness compared with written queries.
    Date
    5. 6.2006 11:22:23
  2. Crestani, F.; Ruthven, I.; Sanderson, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The troubles with using a logical model of IR on a large collection of documents : experimenting retrieval by logical imaging on TREC (1996) 0.02
    0.020475375 = product of:
      0.04095075 = sum of:
        0.04095075 = product of:
          0.0819015 = sum of:
            0.0819015 = weight(_text_:i in 7522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0819015 = score(doc=7522,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 7522, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7522)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Crestani, F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Information retrieval by imaging (1996) 0.01
    0.010589904 = product of:
      0.021179808 = sum of:
        0.021179808 = product of:
          0.042359617 = sum of:
            0.042359617 = weight(_text_:22 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042359617 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  4. Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003) 0.01
    0.010589904 = product of:
      0.021179808 = sum of:
        0.021179808 = product of:
          0.042359617 = sum of:
            0.042359617 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042359617 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:36
  5. Crestani, F.; Mizzaro, S.; Scagnetto, I,: Mobile information retrieval (2017) 0.01
    0.010237687 = product of:
      0.020475375 = sum of:
        0.020475375 = product of:
          0.04095075 = sum of:
            0.04095075 = weight(_text_:i in 4469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04095075 = score(doc=4469,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 4469, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4469)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)