Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0141938655 = product of:
  0.028387731 = sum of:
    0.028387731 = product of:
      0.113550924 = sum of:
        0.113550924 = weight(_text_:authors in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113550924 = score(doc=3106,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22544144 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this paper we analyze a major part of the research output of the Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) community in the period 2000 to 2015 from a network analytical perspective. We fo- cus on the paper output presented at the European NKOS workshops in the last 15 years. Our open dataset, the "NKOS bibliography", includes 14 workshop agendas (ECDL 2000-2010, TPDL 2011-2015) and 4 special issues on NKOS (2001, 2004, 2006 and 2015) which cover 171 papers with 218 distinct authors in total. A focus of the analysis is the visualization of co-authorship networks in this interdisciplinary eld. We used standard network analytic measures like degree and betweenness centrality to de- scribe the co-authorship distribution in our NKOS dataset. We can see in our dataset that 15% (with degree=0) of authors had no co-authorship with others and 53% of them had a maximum of 3 cooperations with other authors. 32% had at least 4 co-authors for all of their papers. The NKOS co-author network in the "NKOS bibliography" is a typical co- authorship network with one relatively large component, many smaller components and many isolated co-authorships or triples.

0.011725057 = product of:
  0.023450114 = sum of:
    0.023450114 = product of:
      0.046900228 = sum of:
        0.046900228 = weight(_text_:22 in 5991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046900228 = score(doc=5991,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5991, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5991)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

8. 7.2006 21:06:22

0.011725057 = product of:
  0.023450114 = sum of:
    0.023450114 = product of:
      0.046900228 = sum of:
        0.046900228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046900228 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.010050048 = product of:
  0.020100096 = sum of:
    0.020100096 = product of:
      0.040200192 = sum of:
        0.040200192 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040200192 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2012 19:25:54

0.008375041 = product of:
  0.016750082 = sum of:
    0.016750082 = product of:
      0.033500165 = sum of:
        0.033500165 = weight(_text_:22 in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033500165 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.0070969327 = product of:
  0.0141938655 = sum of:
    0.0141938655 = product of:
      0.056775462 = sum of:
        0.056775462 = weight(_text_:authors in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056775462 = score(doc=1909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22544144 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - The general science portal "vascoda" merges structured, high-quality information collections from more than 40 providers on the basis of search engine technology (FAST) and a concept which treats semantic heterogeneity between different controlled vocabularies. First experiences with the portal show some weaknesses of this approach which come out in most metadata-driven Digital Libraries (DLs) or subject specific portals. The purpose of the paper is to propose models to reduce the semantic complexity in heterogeneous DLs. The aim is to introduce value-added services (treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking) that gain a certain quality in DLs if they are combined with heterogeneity components established in the project "Competence Center Modeling and Treatment of Semantic Heterogeneity". Design/methodology/approach - Two methods, which are derived from scientometrics and network analysis, will be implemented with the objective to re-rank result sets by the following structural properties: the ranking of the results by core journals (so-called Bradfordizing) and ranking by centrality of authors in co-authorship networks. Findings - The methods, which will be implemented, focus on the query and on the result side of a search and are designed to positively influence each other. Conceptually, they will improve the search quality and guarantee that the most relevant documents in result sets will be ranked higher. Originality/value - The central impact of the paper focuses on the integration of three structural value-adding methods, which aim at reducing the semantic complexity represented in distributed DLs at several stages in the information retrieval process: query construction, search and ranking and re-ranking.

0.005677546 = product of:
  0.011355092 = sum of:
    0.011355092 = product of:
      0.045420367 = sum of:
        0.045420367 = weight(_text_:authors in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045420367 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22544144 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

This study investigates the development of open access (OA) to journal articles from authors affiliated with German universities and non-university research institutions in the period 2010-2018. Beyond determining the overall share of openly available articles, a systematic classification of distinct categories of OA publishing allowed us to identify different patterns of adoption of OA. Taking into account the particularities of the German research landscape, variations in terms of productivity, OA uptake and approaches to OA are examined at the meso-level and possible explanations are discussed. The development of the OA uptake is analysed for the different research sectors in Germany (universities, non-university research institutes of the Helmholtz Association, Fraunhofer Society, Max Planck Society, Leibniz Association, and government research agencies). Combining several data sources (incl. Web of Science, Unpaywall, an authority file of standardised German affiliation information, the ISSN-Gold-OA 3.0 list, and OpenDOAR), the study confirms the growth of the OA share mirroring the international trend reported in related studies. We found that 45% of all considered articles during the observed period were openly available at the time of analysis. Our findings show that subject-specific repositories are the most prevalent type of OA. However, the percentages for publication in fully OA journals and OA via institutional repositories show similarly steep increases. Enabling data-driven decision-making regarding the implementation of OA in Germany at the institutional level, the results of this study furthermore can serve as a baseline to assess the impact recent transformative agreements with major publishers will likely have on scholarly communication.