-
Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988)
0.21
0.2076315 = sum of:
0.023479821 = product of:
0.093919285 = sum of:
0.093919285 = weight(_text_:authors in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093919285 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.18415168 = sum of:
0.12873493 = weight(_text_:z in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12873493 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
0.05541675 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05541675 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
- Abstract
- Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
-
(2013 ff.)
0.18
0.18415168 = product of:
0.36830336 = sum of:
0.36830336 = sum of:
0.25746986 = weight(_text_:z in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25746986 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.94351256 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
0.1108335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1108335 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Type
- z
-
(-2012)
0.18
0.18415168 = product of:
0.36830336 = sum of:
0.36830336 = sum of:
0.25746986 = weight(_text_:z in 5649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25746986 = score(doc=5649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.94351256 = fieldWeight in 5649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5649)
0.1108335 = weight(_text_:22 in 5649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1108335 = score(doc=5649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Type
- z
-
#456
0.16
0.16091865 = product of:
0.3218373 = sum of:
0.3218373 = product of:
0.6436746 = sum of:
0.6436746 = weight(_text_:z in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.6436746 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
2.3587813 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.3125 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- Zeitschrift s. z
-
Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015)
0.15
0.15485893 = sum of:
0.025417656 = product of:
0.10167062 = sum of:
0.10167062 = weight(_text_:authors in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10167062 = score(doc=2590,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.12944128 = sum of:
0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08045933 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.04898195 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04898195 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
17. 9.2018 18:22:23
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.15
0.14557177 = sum of:
0.081204295 = product of:
0.32481718 = sum of:
0.32481718 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.32481718 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43346098 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.064367466 = product of:
0.12873493 = sum of:
0.12873493 = weight(_text_:z in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12873493 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Rodríguez Z. Chinchilla- -> Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z.:
0.14
0.13654402 = product of:
0.27308804 = sum of:
0.27308804 = product of:
0.5461761 = sum of:
0.5461761 = weight(_text_:z in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.5461761 = score(doc=795,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
2.0014925 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rodríguez, Z. Chinchilla -> Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z.:
0.14
0.13654402 = product of:
0.27308804 = sum of:
0.27308804 = product of:
0.5461761 = sum of:
0.5461761 = weight(_text_:z in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.5461761 = score(doc=443,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
2.0014925 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Zheng, R.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.: ¬A framework for authorship identification of online messages : writing-style features and classification techniques (2006)
0.14
0.13584822 = sum of:
0.020753428 = product of:
0.08301371 = sum of:
0.08301371 = weight(_text_:authors in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08301371 = score(doc=5276,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.115094796 = sum of:
0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08045933 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
0.03463547 = weight(_text_:22 in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03463547 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
- Abstract
- With the rapid proliferation of Internet technologies and applications, misuse of online messages for inappropriate or illegal purposes has become a major concern for society. The anonymous nature of online-message distribution makes identity tracing a critical problem. We developed a framework for authorship identification of online messages to address the identity-tracing problem. In this framework, four types of writing-style features (lexical, syntactic, structural, and content-specific features) are extracted and inductive learning algorithms are used to build feature-based classification models to identify authorship of online messages. To examine this framework, we conducted experiments on English and Chinese online-newsgroup messages. We compared the discriminating power of the four types of features and of three classification techniques: decision trees, backpropagation neural networks, and support vector machines. The experimental results showed that the proposed approach was able to identify authors of online messages with satisfactory accuracy of 70 to 95%. All four types of message features contributed to discriminating authors of online messages. Support vector machines outperformed the other two classification techniques in our experiments. The high performance we achieved for both the English and Chinese datasets showed the potential of this approach in a multiple-language context.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:14:37
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.13
0.13006514 = product of:
0.2601303 = sum of:
0.2601303 = product of:
0.5202606 = sum of:
0.20301075 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20301075 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43346098 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.3172498 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3172498 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5418651 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018)
0.13
0.12976968 = sum of:
0.014674889 = product of:
0.058699556 = sum of:
0.058699556 = weight(_text_:authors in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058699556 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.115094796 = sum of:
0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08045933 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.03463547 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03463547 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
- Abstract
- Studies on the state and structure of digital knowledge concerning science generally relate to macro and meso scales. Supported by visualizations, these studies can deliver knowledge about emerging scientific fields or collaboration between countries, scientific centers, or groups of researchers. Analyses of individual activities or single scientific career paths are rarely presented and discussed. The authors decided to fill this gap and developed a web application for visualizing the scientific output of particular researchers. This free software based on bibliographic data from local databases, provides six layouts for analysis. Researchers can see the dynamic characteristics of their own writing activity, the time and place of publication, and the thematic scope of research problems. They can also identify cooperation networks, and consequently, study the dependencies and regularities in their own scientific activity. The current article presents the results of a study of the application's usability and functionality as well as attempts to define different user groups. A survey about the interface was sent to select researchers employed at Nicolaus Copernicus University. The results were used to answer the question as to whether such a specialized visualization tool can significantly augment the individual information space of the contemporary researcher.
- Date
- 21.12.2018 17:22:13
-
Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Law, R.: Editorial responsiveness, journal quality, and total review time : an empirical analysis (2012)
0.12
0.11523539 = sum of:
0.035584714 = product of:
0.14233886 = sum of:
0.14233886 = weight(_text_:authors in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14233886 = score(doc=245,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07965067 = product of:
0.15930134 = sum of:
0.15930134 = weight(_text_:z in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15930134 = score(doc=245,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.5837686 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study examined the relationships among perceived editorial responsiveness, perceived journal quality, and review time of submissions for authors in mainland China. Online review data generated by authors who have experienced the submission process in 10 Chinese academic journals were collected. The results of Spearman correlation analysis show that Chinese authors' perceived responsiveness of an editorial office is positively correlated with perceived quality of the journal, and the total review time does not affect perceptions of the quality of a journal and its editorial responsiveness.
-
Figueroa, Z.H. -> Hernández Figueroa, Z.:
0.11
0.11264306 = product of:
0.22528613 = sum of:
0.22528613 = product of:
0.45057225 = sum of:
0.45057225 = weight(_text_:z in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.45057225 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
1.651147 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wellisch, H.H.: Indexing the continuum of verbal texts (1997)
0.11
0.1098091 = sum of:
0.029349778 = product of:
0.11739911 = sum of:
0.11739911 = weight(_text_:authors in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11739911 = score(doc=1101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.08045933 = product of:
0.16091865 = sum of:
0.16091865 = weight(_text_:z in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16091865 = score(doc=1101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.58969533 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Differentiates items on a continuum of verbal texts as: books; periodicals; databases. Discusses the requirements of their indexing, with varying problems of policy, language, depth, authors' names, and titles, in both printed and electronic form
- Footnote
- From Wellisch, H.H.: Indexing from A to Z. 2nd ed. 1996
-
Gazni, A.; Ghaseminik, Z.: Author practices in citing other authors, institutions, and journals (2016)
0.11
0.10585776 = sum of:
0.0656281 = product of:
0.2625124 = sum of:
0.2625124 = weight(_text_:authors in 3129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2625124 = score(doc=3129,freq=40.0), product of:
0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
1.1262684 = fieldWeight in 3129, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3129)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.040229663 = product of:
0.08045933 = sum of:
0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 3129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08045933 = score(doc=3129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 3129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study explores the extent to which authors with different impact and productivity levels cite journals, institutions, and other authors through an analysis of the scientific papers of 37,717 authors during 1990-2013. The results demonstrate that the core-scatter distribution of cited authors, institutions, and journals varies for authors in each impact and productivity class. All authors in the science network receive the majority of their credit from high-impact authors; however, this effect decreases as authors' impact levels decrease. Similarly, the proportion of citations that lower-impact authors make to each other increases as authors' impact levels decrease. High-impact authors, who have the highest degree of membership in the science network, publish fewer papers in comparison to highly productive authors. However, authors with the highest impact make both more references per paper and also more citations to papers in the science network. This suggests that high-impact authors produce the most relevant work in the science network. Comparing practices by productivity level, authors receive the majority of their credit from highly productive authors and authors cite highly productive authors more frequently than less productive authors.
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.10
0.102376394 = sum of:
0.046959642 = product of:
0.18783857 = sum of:
0.18783857 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18783857 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.05541675 = product of:
0.1108335 = sum of:
0.1108335 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1108335 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.10
0.096630186 = sum of:
0.07931245 = product of:
0.3172498 = sum of:
0.3172498 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3172498 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5418651 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017317735 = product of:
0.03463547 = sum of:
0.03463547 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03463547 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Rodríguez, Z.Chinchilla -> Chinchilla Rodríguez, Z.:
0.10
0.0965512 = product of:
0.1931024 = sum of:
0.1931024 = product of:
0.3862048 = sum of:
0.3862048 = weight(_text_:z in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3862048 = score(doc=67,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
1.4152689 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Khurshid, Z.: Cataloguing of audiovisual materials (1995)
0.09
0.09207584 = product of:
0.18415168 = sum of:
0.18415168 = sum of:
0.12873493 = weight(_text_:z in 8305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12873493 = score(doc=8305,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 8305, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8305)
0.05541675 = weight(_text_:22 in 8305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05541675 = score(doc=8305,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8305, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8305)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 13:09:02
-
Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995)
0.09
0.09207584 = product of:
0.18415168 = sum of:
0.18415168 = sum of:
0.12873493 = weight(_text_:z in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12873493 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
0.05541675 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05541675 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051127672 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 6.1996 19:22:20
