Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × author_ss:"Gnoli, C."
  1. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01
    0.010591612 = product of:
      0.021183224 = sum of:
        0.021183224 = product of:
          0.04236645 = sum of:
            0.04236645 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04236645 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  2. Gnoli, C.: ¬The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.010153829 = product of:
      0.020307658 = sum of:
        0.020307658 = product of:
          0.040615316 = sum of:
            0.040615316 = weight(_text_:g in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040615316 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  3. Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004) 0.01
    0.008975235 = product of:
      0.01795047 = sum of:
        0.01795047 = product of:
          0.07180188 = sum of:
            0.07180188 = weight(_text_:authors in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07180188 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
  4. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : Part 2: Types and levels (2017) 0.01
    0.008975235 = product of:
      0.01795047 = sum of:
        0.01795047 = product of:
          0.07180188 = sum of:
            0.07180188 = weight(_text_:authors in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07180188 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    After making the case that phenomena can be the primary unit of classification (Part 1), some basic principles to group and sort phenomena are considered. Entities can be grouped together on the basis of both their similarity (morphology) and their common origin (phylogeny). The resulting groups will form the classical hierarchical chains of types and subtypes. At every hierarchical degree, phenomena can form ordered sets (arrays), where their sorting can reflect levels of increasing organization, corresponding to an evolutionary order of appearance (emergence). The theory of levels of reality has been investigated by many philosophers and applied to knowledge organization systems by various authors, which are briefly reviewed. At the broadest degree, it allows to identify some major strata of phenomena (forms, matter, life, minds, societies and culture) in turn divided into layers. A list of twenty-six layers is proposed to form the main classes of the Integrative Levels Classification system. A combination of morphology and phylogeny can determine whether a given phenomenon should be a type of an existing level, or a level on its own.