Search (4850 results, page 1 of 243)

0.25407493 = sum of:
  0.020028863 = product of:
    0.08011545 = sum of:
      0.08011545 = weight(_text_:authors in 4892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08011545 = score(doc=4892,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22722775 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4892, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4892)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.23404607 = sum of:
    0.18677422 = weight(_text_:m.d in 4892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18677422 = score(doc=4892,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04984361 = queryNorm
        0.53833824 = fieldWeight in 4892, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4892)
    0.047271848 = weight(_text_:22 in 4892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047271848 = score(doc=4892,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17454383 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04984361 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4892, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4892)

Abstract

Latent semantic indexing (LSI) is a statistical technique for improving information retrieval effectiveness. Here, we use LSI to assist in literature-based discoveries. The idea behind literature-based discoveries is that different authors have already published certain underlying scientific ideas that, when taken together, can be connected to hypothesize a new dicovery, and that these connections can be made by exploring the scientific literature. We explore latent semantic indexing's effectiveness on 2 discovery processes: uncovering 'nearby' relationships that are necessary to initiate the literature based discovery process; and discovering more distant relationships that may genuinely generate new discovery hypotheses

Date

11. 2.2016 16:22:19

0.21777853 = sum of:
  0.017167598 = product of:
    0.06867039 = sum of:
      0.06867039 = weight(_text_:authors in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06867039 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22722775 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.20061094 = sum of:
    0.1600922 = weight(_text_:m.d in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1600922 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04984361 = queryNorm
        0.4614328 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
    0.040518723 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040518723 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17454383 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04984361 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)

Abstract

Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.

Source

Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45

0.20061094 = product of:
  0.40122187 = sum of:
    0.40122187 = sum of:
      0.3201844 = weight(_text_:m.d in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.3201844 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.9228656 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
      0.08103745 = weight(_text_:22 in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08103745 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17454383 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

15. 6.1996 18:06:22

Editor

Joachim, M.D.

0.16717577 = product of:
  0.33435154 = sum of:
    0.33435154 = sum of:
      0.2668203 = weight(_text_:m.d in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2668203 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.76905465 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
      0.06753121 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06753121 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17454383 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages

S.3-22

Source

Historical aspects of cataloging and classification. Ed.: M.D. Joachim

0.16717577 = product of:
  0.33435154 = sum of:
    0.33435154 = sum of:
      0.2668203 = weight(_text_:m.d in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2668203 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.76905465 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
      0.06753121 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06753121 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17454383 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

29. 7.2006 20:06:22

Source

Historical aspects of cataloging and classification. Ed.: M.D. Joachim

0.16496019 = sum of:
  0.011445065 = product of:
    0.04578026 = sum of:
      0.04578026 = weight(_text_:authors in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04578026 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22722775 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.15351513 = sum of:
    0.10672813 = weight(_text_:m.d in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10672813 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04984361 = queryNorm
        0.30762187 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
    0.046786997 = weight(_text_:22 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046786997 = score(doc=2749,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.17454383 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04984361 = queryNorm
        0.268053 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)

Classification

658.4/038 22

Date

22. 3.2009 18:43:51

DDC

658.4/038 22

Editor

Srikantaiah, T.K. u. M.D. Koenig

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 60(2006) no.3, S.642 (A.E. Prentice): "What is knowledge management (KM)? How do we define it? How do we use it and what are the benefits? KM is still an operational discipline that has yet to have an academic foundation. Its core has yet to solidify and concepts and practices remain fluid, making it difficult to discuss or even to identify the range of relevant elements. Being aware of this lack of a well-structured retrievable disciplinary literature, the editors made a practice of attending trade shows and conferences attended by KM professionals to look for presentations that would in some way expand knowledge of the field. They asked presenters to turn their paper into a book chapter, which is the major source of the material in this book. Although this is a somewhat chancy method of identifying authors and topics, several of the papers are excellent and a number add to an understanding of KM. Because of the fluidity of the area of study, the editors devised a three-dimensional topic expansion approach to the content so that the reader can follow themes in the papers that would not have been easy to do if one relied solely on the table of contents. The table of contents organizes the presentations into eight subject sections, each section with a foreword that introduces the topic and indicates briefly the contribution of each chapter to the overall section title. Following this, the Roadmap lists 18 topics or themes that appear in the book and relevant chapters where information on the theme can be found. Readers have the choice of following themes using the roadmap or of reading the book section by section. ..."

0.1600922 = product of:
  0.3201844 = sum of:
    0.3201844 = product of:
      0.6403688 = sum of:
        0.6403688 = weight(_text_:m.d in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6403688 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04984361 = queryNorm
            1.8457313 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.13374062 = product of:
  0.26748124 = sum of:
    0.26748124 = sum of:
      0.21345626 = weight(_text_:m.d in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21345626 = score(doc=2855,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.61524373 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
      0.05402497 = weight(_text_:22 in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05402497 = score(doc=2855,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17454383 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30.11.1995 17:22:01

0.13341016 = product of:
  0.2668203 = sum of:
    0.2668203 = product of:
      0.5336406 = sum of:
        0.5336406 = weight(_text_:m.d in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5336406 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04984361 = queryNorm
            1.5381093 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.13341016 = product of:
  0.2668203 = sum of:
    0.2668203 = product of:
      0.5336406 = sum of:
        0.5336406 = weight(_text_:m.d in 3229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5336406 = score(doc=3229,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04984361 = queryNorm
            1.5381093 = fieldWeight in 3229, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3229)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.12679857 = product of:
  0.25359714 = sum of:
    0.25359714 = product of:
      0.5071943 = sum of:
        0.19791216 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19791216 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42257467 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04984361 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.30928215 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30928215 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5282563 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04984361 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.

0.1217122 = sum of:
  0.02832509 = product of:
    0.11330036 = sum of:
      0.11330036 = weight(_text_:authors in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11330036 = score(doc=1909,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22722775 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.09338711 = product of:
    0.18677422 = sum of:
      0.18677422 = weight(_text_:m.d in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18677422 = score(doc=1909,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.53833824 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

As part of a project to develop a means of measuring service quality in special libraries, the authors review the service marketing literature for models and methods. They focus on 2 techniques; SERVQUAL, which measures service quality on the basis of expectations and performance, and SERVPERF, which is based on performance alone. The authors then assess the applicability of these methods to special libraries and information centres. The methods of SERVQUAL and SERVPERF seem applicable to not only these kinds of libraries, but to other kinds as well. An important unknown which may prevent outright adoption of one of these instruments is the extent to which they adequately reflect the values library clients attach to information services. If they do not, some item may have to be addedd

0.11821112 = product of:
  0.23642224 = sum of:
    0.23642224 = sum of:
      0.18867047 = weight(_text_:m.d in 4720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18867047 = score(doc=4720,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.5438038 = fieldWeight in 4720, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4720)
      0.047751777 = weight(_text_:22 in 4720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047751777 = score(doc=4720,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17454383 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4720, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4720)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article characterises the questioning behaviour in reference interviews preceding delegated online searches of bibliographic databases and relates it to questioning behaviour in other types of interviews/settings. With one exception, the unit of analysis is the question (N=610), not the interview. The author uses A.C. Graesser's typology of questions to analyse type of question and M.D. White's typology of information categories to determine the question's content objective; this is the first application of Graesser's typology to interview questions in any setting. Graesser's categories allow for a more subtle understanding of the kind of information need underlying a question. Comparisons are made between questions asked by the information specialist and those asked by the client. Findings show that the information specialist dominates the interview, about half the questions were verification questions and about 22% were judgemental questions or requests; all but four types of questions from Graesser's categories appeared in the interviews, but no new question types were discovered. Clients often phrase questions as requests. In content, both clients and information specialists focus on the subject and service requested, but the clients ask also about search strategy and output features. Both parties ask predominantly short-answer questions. Results are related to interface design for retrieval systems.

Date

2.12.2005 14:48:22

0.117023036 = product of:
  0.23404607 = sum of:
    0.23404607 = sum of:
      0.18677422 = weight(_text_:m.d in 5183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18677422 = score(doc=5183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.53833824 = fieldWeight in 5183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5183)
      0.047271848 = weight(_text_:22 in 5183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047271848 = score(doc=5183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17454383 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5183)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.117023036 = product of:
  0.23404607 = sum of:
    0.23404607 = sum of:
      0.18677422 = weight(_text_:m.d in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18677422 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.53833824 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
      0.047271848 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047271848 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17454383 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.11341597 = sum of:
  0.020028863 = product of:
    0.08011545 = sum of:
      0.08011545 = weight(_text_:authors in 5648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08011545 = score(doc=5648,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22722775 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5648, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5648)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.09338711 = product of:
    0.18677422 = sum of:
      0.18677422 = weight(_text_:m.d in 5648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18677422 = score(doc=5648,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04984361 = queryNorm
          0.53833824 = fieldWeight in 5648, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5648)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Biblioteca Nacional of Madrid and the U.S. National Library of Medicine, followed by libraries worldwide, have changed the authorship of the 1587 Nueva filosofía de la naturaleza del hombre from Oliva Sabuco to her father, Miguel Sabuco y Alvarez. The authors present arguments offered by others supporting this change and examine newly uncovered archival documents to show that the change of named author to Miguel Sabuco is founded on mistaken arguments based on misconstrued evidence and that the burden of proof has been met to restore the attribution of this work to Oliva Sabuco.

Source

Historical aspects of cataloging and classification. Ed.: M.D. Joachim

0.10672813 = product of:
  0.21345626 = sum of:
    0.21345626 = product of:
      0.42691252 = sum of:
        0.42691252 = weight(_text_:m.d in 2716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.42691252 = score(doc=2716,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04984361 = queryNorm
            1.2304875 = fieldWeight in 2716, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2716)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10672813 = product of:
  0.21345626 = sum of:
    0.21345626 = product of:
      0.42691252 = sum of:
        0.42691252 = weight(_text_:m.d in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.42691252 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04984361 = queryNorm
            1.2304875 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10672813 = product of:
  0.21345626 = sum of:
    0.21345626 = product of:
      0.42691252 = sum of:
        0.42691252 = weight(_text_:m.d in 5157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.42691252 = score(doc=5157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04984361 = queryNorm
            1.2304875 = fieldWeight in 5157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5157)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10672813 = product of:
  0.21345626 = sum of:
    0.21345626 = product of:
      0.42691252 = sum of:
        0.42691252 = weight(_text_:m.d in 7761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.42691252 = score(doc=7761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34694585 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04984361 = queryNorm
            1.2304875 = fieldWeight in 7761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)