Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Cabanac, G."
  • × author_ss:"Hartley, J."
  1. Cabanac, G.; Hubert, G.; Hartley, J.: Solo versus collaborative writing : discrepancies in the use of tables and graphs in academic articles (2014) 0.02 
    0.018146584 = product of:
  0.036293168 = sum of:
    0.036293168 = product of:
      0.14517267 = sum of:
        0.14517267 = weight(_text_:authors in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14517267 = score(doc=1242,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.60441905 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The number of authors collaborating to write scientific articles has been increasing steadily, and with this collaboration, other factors have also changed, such as the length of articles and the number of citations. However, little is known about potential discrepancies in the use of tables and graphs between single and collaborating authors. In this article, we ask whether multiauthor articles contain more tables and graphs than single-author articles, and we studied 5,180 recent articles published in six science and social sciences journals. We found that pairs and multiple authors used significantly more tables and graphs than single authors. Such findings indicate that there is a greater emphasis on the role of tables and graphs in collaborative writing, and we discuss some of the possible causes and implications of these findings.
  2. Cabanac, G.; Hartley, J.: Issues of work-life balance among JASIST authors and editors (2013) 0.01 
    0.012831573 = product of:
  0.025663147 = sum of:
    0.025663147 = product of:
      0.10265259 = sum of:
        0.10265259 = weight(_text_:authors in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10265259 = score(doc=996,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Many dedicated scientists reject the concept of maintaining a "work-life balance." They argue that work is actually a huge part of life. In the mind-set of these scientists, weekdays and weekends are equally appropriate for working on their research. Although we all have encountered such people, we may wonder how widespread this condition is with other scientists in our field. This brief communication probes work-life balance issues among JASIST authors and editors. We collected and examined the publication histories for 1,533 of the 2,402 articles published in JASIST between 2001 and 2012. Although there is no rush to submit, revise, or accept papers, we found that 11% of these events happened during weekends and that this trend has been increasing since 2005. Our findings suggest that working during the weekend may be one of the ways that scientists cope with the highly demanding era of "publish or perish." We hope that our findings will raise an awareness of the steady increases in work among scientists before it affects our work-life balance even more.
  3. Hartley, J.; Cabanac, G.; Kozak, M.; Hubert, G.: Research on tables and graphs in academic articles : pitfalls and promises (2015) 0.01 
    0.0072092023 = product of:
  0.014418405 = sum of:
    0.014418405 = product of:
      0.02883681 = sum of:
        0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02883681 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors