Search (4800 results, page 1 of 240)

0.33302614 = sum of:
  0.02259242 = product of:
    0.09036968 = sum of:
      0.09036968 = weight(_text_:authors in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09036968 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22427242 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.31043372 = sum of:
    0.2571114 = weight(_text_:r.d in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2571114 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04919534 = queryNorm
        0.679667 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
    0.05332232 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05332232 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17227371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04919534 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)

Abstract

The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem

0.23282528 = product of:
  0.46565056 = sum of:
    0.46565056 = sum of:
      0.3856671 = weight(_text_:r.d in 7831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.3856671 = score(doc=7831,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          1.0195005 = fieldWeight in 7831, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7831)
      0.07998347 = weight(_text_:22 in 7831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07998347 = score(doc=7831,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17227371 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7831, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7831)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Bertelsmann Briefe. 1994, H.131, S.22-25

0.17473418 = product of:
  0.34946835 = sum of:
    0.34946835 = sum of:
      0.2571114 = weight(_text_:r.d in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2571114 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.679667 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
      0.092356965 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.092356965 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17227371 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.2007 18:56:23
22. 2.2007 19:22:13

0.16196585 = sum of:
  0.026151093 = product of:
    0.10460437 = sum of:
      0.10460437 = weight(_text_:authors in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10460437 = score(doc=3807,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.22427242 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.46641657 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.13581476 = sum of:
    0.112486236 = weight(_text_:r.d in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.112486236 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04919534 = queryNorm
        0.2973543 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
    0.023328515 = weight(_text_:22 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023328515 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17227371 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04919534 = queryNorm
        0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)

Abstract

Purpose Academic authors tend to define terms that meet their own needs. Knowledge Management (KM) is a term that comes to mind and is examined in this study. Lexicographical research identified KM terms used by authors from 1996 to 2006 in academic outlets to define KM. Data were collected based on strict criteria which included that definitions should be unique instances. From 2006 onwards, these authors could not identify new unique instances of definitions with repetitive usage of such definition instances. Analysis revealed that KM is directly defined by People (Person and Organisation), Processes (Codify, Share, Leverage, and Process) and Contextualised Content (Information). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach The aim of this paper is to add to the body of knowledge in the KM discipline and supply KM practitioners and scholars with insight into what is commonly regarded to be KM so as to reignite the debate on what one could consider as KM. The lexicon used by KM scholars was evaluated though the application of lexicographical research methods as extended though Knowledge Discovery and Text Analysis methods. Findings By simplifying term relationships through the application of lexicographical research methods, as extended though Knowledge Discovery and Text Analysis methods, it was found that KM is directly defined by People (Person and Organisation), Processes (Codify, Share, Leverage, Process) and Contextualised Content (Information). One would therefore be able to indicate that KM, from an academic point of view, refers to people processing contextualised content.
Research limitations/implications In total, 42 definitions were identified spanning a period of 11 years. This represented the first use of KM through the estimated apex of terms used. From 2006 onwards definitions were used in repetition, and all definitions that were considered to repeat were therefore subsequently excluded as not being unique instances. All definitions listed are by no means complete and exhaustive. The definitions are viewed outside the scope and context in which they were originally formulated and then used to review the key concepts in the definitions themselves. Social implications When the authors refer to the aforementioned discussion of KM content as well as the presentation of the method followed in this paper, the authors may have a few implications for future research in KM. First the research validates ideas presented by the OECD in 2005 pertaining to KM. It also validates that through the evolution of KM, the authors ended with a description of KM that may be seen as a standardised description. If the authors as academics and practitioners, for example, refer to KM as the same construct and/or idea, it has the potential to speculatively, distinguish between what KM may or may not be. Originality/value By simplifying the term used to define KM, by focusing on the most common definitions, the paper assist in refocusing KM by reconsidering the dimensions that is the most common in how it has been defined over time. This would hopefully assist in reigniting discussions about KM and how it may be used to the benefit of an organisation.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.15521686 = product of:
  0.31043372 = sum of:
    0.31043372 = sum of:
      0.2571114 = weight(_text_:r.d in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2571114 = score(doc=5555,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.679667 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
      0.05332232 = weight(_text_:22 in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05332232 = score(doc=5555,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17227371 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library resources and technical services. 22(1978), S.409-414

0.1322546 = sum of:
  0.019768367 = product of:
    0.07907347 = sum of:
      0.07907347 = weight(_text_:authors in 1602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07907347 = score(doc=1602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22427242 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1602)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.112486236 = product of:
    0.22497247 = sum of:
      0.22497247 = weight(_text_:r.d in 1602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22497247 = score(doc=1602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.5947086 = fieldWeight in 1602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1602)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The symbol for sharp and flat in music notation present special problems for the retrieval of music materials from online catalogues. Reports a questionnaire survey of music librarians to determine how these retrieval problems are dealt with in the confines of individual online catalogues, while noting parallels with the authors' earlier study of the same problem from the perspective of online catalogue vendors. Results reveal that there is a great deal of variations in the music sysmbol retrieval capabilities of individual online systems, and that music technical services librarians are only somewhat satisfied with the manner in which different online systems deal with this problem

0.1285557 = product of:
  0.2571114 = sum of:
    0.2571114 = product of:
      0.5142228 = sum of:
        0.5142228 = weight(_text_:r.d in 3210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5142228 = score(doc=3210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            1.359334 = fieldWeight in 3210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3210)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Aluri, R.D.; Riggs, D.E.

0.1285557 = product of:
  0.2571114 = sum of:
    0.2571114 = product of:
      0.5142228 = sum of:
        0.5142228 = weight(_text_:r.d in 5198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5142228 = score(doc=5198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            1.359334 = fieldWeight in 5198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5198)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.1285557 = product of:
  0.2571114 = sum of:
    0.2571114 = product of:
      0.5142228 = sum of:
        0.5142228 = weight(_text_:r.d in 6248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5142228 = score(doc=6248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            1.359334 = fieldWeight in 6248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.1285557 = product of:
  0.2571114 = sum of:
    0.2571114 = product of:
      0.5142228 = sum of:
        0.5142228 = weight(_text_:r.d in 6214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5142228 = score(doc=6214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            1.359334 = fieldWeight in 6214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6214)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.1285557 = product of:
  0.2571114 = sum of:
    0.2571114 = product of:
      0.5142228 = sum of:
        0.5142228 = weight(_text_:r.d in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5142228 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            1.359334 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.12514944 = product of:
  0.2502989 = sum of:
    0.2502989 = product of:
      0.5005978 = sum of:
        0.19533812 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19533812 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41707864 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.30525964 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30525964 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5213858 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.

0.112486236 = product of:
  0.22497247 = sum of:
    0.22497247 = product of:
      0.44994494 = sum of:
        0.44994494 = weight(_text_:r.d in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44994494 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            1.1894172 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.112486236 = product of:
  0.22497247 = sum of:
    0.22497247 = product of:
      0.44994494 = sum of:
        0.44994494 = weight(_text_:r.d in 3037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44994494 = score(doc=3037,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            1.1894172 = fieldWeight in 3037, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3037)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.09850716 = sum of:
  0.04518484 = product of:
    0.18073936 = sum of:
      0.18073936 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18073936 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22427242 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05332232 = product of:
    0.10664464 = sum of:
      0.10664464 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10664464 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17227371 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22

0.09641677 = product of:
  0.19283354 = sum of:
    0.19283354 = product of:
      0.3856671 = sum of:
        0.3856671 = weight(_text_:r.d in 7614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3856671 = score(doc=7614,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            1.0195005 = fieldWeight in 7614, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7614)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.09641677 = product of:
  0.19283354 = sum of:
    0.19283354 = product of:
      0.3856671 = sum of:
        0.3856671 = weight(_text_:r.d in 5713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3856671 = score(doc=5713,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            1.0195005 = fieldWeight in 5713, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5713)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.092978135 = sum of:
  0.07631491 = product of:
    0.30525964 = sum of:
      0.30525964 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.30525964 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5213858 = queryWeight, product of:
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.016663225 = product of:
    0.03332645 = sum of:
      0.03332645 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03332645 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17227371 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04919534 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20

0.08034731 = product of:
  0.16069461 = sum of:
    0.16069461 = product of:
      0.32138923 = sum of:
        0.32138923 = weight(_text_:r.d in 6217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32138923 = score(doc=6217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            0.84958375 = fieldWeight in 6217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: CD-ROM librarian 8(1992) no.8, S.41 (R.D. Johnson); IfB 1(1993) H.3/4, S.151-152

0.08034731 = product of:
  0.16069461 = sum of:
    0.16069461 = product of:
      0.32138923 = sum of:
        0.32138923 = weight(_text_:r.d in 51) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32138923 = score(doc=51,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37829024 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04919534 = queryNorm
            0.84958375 = fieldWeight in 51, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.689554 = idf(docFreq=54, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=51)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Früher u.d.T.: 'Optical publishing directory'. - Rez. in: CD-ROM professional. 1993, Nov., S.239-240 (J. Reese); CD-ROM world 8(1993) no.8, S.72 (R.D. Johnson); Library software review 13(1994) no.1, S.69-70 (K.-N. Au)