Search (4981 results, page 1 of 250)

  1. Carroll, J.M.; Mack, R.L.: Metaphor, computing systems and active learning (1985) 0.22
    0.22061089 = product of:
      0.44122177 = sum of:
        0.44122177 = sum of:
          0.33161548 = weight(_text_:j.m in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.33161548 = score(doc=6506,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              1.0767618 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
          0.109606296 = weight(_text_:22 in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.109606296 = score(doc=6506,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International journal of man-machine studies. 22(1985), S.39-57
  2. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.20
    0.20028792 = sum of:
      0.03482976 = product of:
        0.13931905 = sum of:
          0.13931905 = weight(_text_:authors in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13931905 = score(doc=4215,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.23050074 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.60441905 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.16545816 = sum of:
        0.1243558 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1243558 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05056156 = queryNorm
            0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
        0.041102357 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041102357 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05056156 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  3. Ullate, J.M. Angós -> Angós Ullate, J.M.: 0.18
    0.17586567 = product of:
      0.35173133 = sum of:
        0.35173133 = product of:
          0.70346266 = sum of:
            0.70346266 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.70346266 = score(doc=2704,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05056156 = queryNorm
                2.2841568 = fieldWeight in 2704, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2704)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Nunes, J.M. Baptista => Baptista Nunes, J.M.: 0.18
    0.17586567 = product of:
      0.35173133 = sum of:
        0.35173133 = product of:
          0.70346266 = sum of:
            0.70346266 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.70346266 = score(doc=4242,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05056156 = queryNorm
                2.2841568 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Open MIND (2015) 0.15
    0.15239419 = sum of:
      0.0145124 = product of:
        0.0580496 = sum of:
          0.0580496 = weight(_text_:authors in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0580496 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23050074 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.13788179 = sum of:
        0.10362983 = weight(_text_:j.m in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10362983 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05056156 = queryNorm
            0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
        0.034251966 = weight(_text_:22 in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034251966 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05056156 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
    
    Abstract
    This is an edited collection of 39 original papers and as many commentaries and replies. The target papers and replies were written by senior members of the MIND Group, while all commentaries were written by junior group members. All papers and commentaries have undergone a rigorous process of anonymous peer review, during which the junior members of the MIND Group acted as reviewers. The final versions of all the target articles, commentaries and replies have undergone additional editorial review. Besides offering a cross-section of ongoing, cutting-edge research in philosophy and cognitive science, this collection is also intended to be a free electronic resource for teaching. It therefore also contains a selection of online supporting materials, pointers to video and audio files and to additional free material supplied by the 92 authors represented in this volume. We will add more multimedia material, a searchable literature database, and tools to work with the online version in the future. All contributions to this collection are strictly open access. They can be downloaded, printed, and reproduced by anyone.
    Date
    27. 1.2015 11:48:22
    Editor
    Metzinger, T. u.. J.M. Windt
  6. Smith, J.M.: ¬The Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) : guidelines for authors (1987) 0.14
    0.1446771 = sum of:
      0.041047268 = product of:
        0.16418907 = sum of:
          0.16418907 = weight(_text_:authors in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16418907 = score(doc=5946,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23050074 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.10362983 = product of:
        0.20725965 = sum of:
          0.20725965 = weight(_text_:j.m in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20725965 = score(doc=5946,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.67297614 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Guidelines for authors of scholarly publications who wish to prepare documents for a publisher on existing text entry devices, word processors and personal computers, adding markup to the text in accordance with the SGML
  7. Creating Web-accessible databases : case studies for libraries, museums, and other nonprofits (2001) 0.14
    0.13788179 = product of:
      0.27576357 = sum of:
        0.27576357 = sum of:
          0.20725965 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20725965 = score(doc=4806,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.67297614 = fieldWeight in 4806, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4806)
          0.06850393 = weight(_text_:22 in 4806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06850393 = score(doc=4806,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4806, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4806)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:21:28
    Editor
    Still, J.M.
  8. Budd, J.M.: ¬The complexity of information retrieval : a hypothetical example (1996) 0.14
    0.13788179 = product of:
      0.27576357 = sum of:
        0.27576357 = sum of:
          0.20725965 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20725965 = score(doc=4928,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.67297614 = fieldWeight in 4928, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4928)
          0.06850393 = weight(_text_:22 in 4928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06850393 = score(doc=4928,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4928, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4928)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.2, S.111-117
  9. Digital image access and retrieval : Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996 (1997) 0.14
    0.13788179 = product of:
      0.27576357 = sum of:
        0.27576357 = sum of:
          0.20725965 = weight(_text_:j.m in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20725965 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.67297614 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
          0.06850393 = weight(_text_:22 in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06850393 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 49(1998) no.8, S. 766-767 (J.M. Turner)
  10. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.14
    0.13788179 = product of:
      0.27576357 = sum of:
        0.27576357 = sum of:
          0.20725965 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20725965 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.67297614 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
          0.06850393 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06850393 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.13
    0.12862499 = product of:
      0.25724998 = sum of:
        0.25724998 = product of:
          0.51449996 = sum of:
            0.2007629 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2007629 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42866147 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05056156 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.31373706 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.31373706 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.5358653 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05056156 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  12. Brunetti, J.M.; Roberto García, R.: User-centered design and evaluation of overview components for semantic data exploration (2014) 0.12
    0.12191536 = sum of:
      0.011609919 = product of:
        0.046439677 = sum of:
          0.046439677 = weight(_text_:authors in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046439677 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23050074 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.11030544 = sum of:
        0.08290387 = weight(_text_:j.m in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08290387 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05056156 = queryNorm
            0.26919046 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.027401574 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027401574 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05056156 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The growing volumes of semantic data available in the web result in the need for handling the information overload phenomenon. The potential of this amount of data is enormous but in most cases it is very difficult for users to visualize, explore and use this data, especially for lay-users without experience with Semantic Web technologies. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The Visual Information-Seeking Mantra "Overview first, zoom and filter, then details-on-demand" proposed by Shneiderman describes how data should be presented in different stages to achieve an effective exploration. The overview is the first user task when dealing with a data set. The objective is that the user is capable of getting an idea about the overall structure of the data set. Different information architecture (IA) components supporting the overview tasks have been developed, so they are automatically generated from semantic data, and evaluated with end-users. Findings - The chosen IA components are well known to web users, as they are present in most web pages: navigation bars, site maps and site indexes. The authors complement them with Treemaps, a visualization technique for displaying hierarchical data. These components have been developed following an iterative User-Centered Design methodology. Evaluations with end-users have shown that they get easily used to them despite the fact that they are generated automatically from structured data, without requiring knowledge about the underlying semantic technologies, and that the different overview components complement each other as they focus on different information search needs. Originality/value - Obtaining semantic data sets overviews cannot be easily done with the current semantic web browsers. Overviews become difficult to achieve with large heterogeneous data sets, which is typical in the Semantic Web, because traditional IA techniques do not easily scale to large data sets. There is little or no support to obtain overview information quickly and easily at the beginning of the exploration of a new data set. This can be a serious limitation when exploring a data set for the first time, especially for lay-users. The proposal is to reuse and adapt existing IA components to provide this overview to users and show that they can be generated automatically from the thesaurus and ontologies that structure semantic data while providing a comparable user experience to traditional web sites.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  13. Cherry, J.M.; Clinton, M.: ¬An experimental investigation of two types of instruction for OPAC users (1991) 0.11
    0.11030544 = product of:
      0.22061089 = sum of:
        0.22061089 = sum of:
          0.16580774 = weight(_text_:j.m in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16580774 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.5383809 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
          0.054803148 = weight(_text_:22 in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054803148 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.4, S.2-22
  14. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.11
    0.11030544 = product of:
      0.22061089 = sum of:
        0.22061089 = sum of:
          0.16580774 = weight(_text_:j.m in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16580774 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.5383809 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.054803148 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054803148 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
  15. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.11
    0.11030544 = product of:
      0.22061089 = sum of:
        0.22061089 = sum of:
          0.16580774 = weight(_text_:j.m in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16580774 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.5383809 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
          0.054803148 = weight(_text_:22 in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054803148 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  16. Aliprand, J.M.: Scripts, languages, and authority control (2005) 0.11
    0.11030544 = product of:
      0.22061089 = sum of:
        0.22061089 = sum of:
          0.16580774 = weight(_text_:j.m in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16580774 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.5383809 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
          0.054803148 = weight(_text_:22 in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054803148 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. O'Connor, B.C.: Representation and the utility of moving image documents (1986) 0.11
    0.10612371 = sum of:
      0.023219839 = product of:
        0.092879355 = sum of:
          0.092879355 = weight(_text_:authors in 2617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.092879355 = score(doc=2617,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23050074 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2617, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2617)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.08290387 = product of:
        0.16580774 = sum of:
          0.16580774 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16580774 = score(doc=2617,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.5383809 = fieldWeight in 2617, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2617)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines 2 aspects of representation for the manner in which each has inhibited the scholarly use of film and video works. Most access systems have been designed for printed documents, which differ fundamentally from moving image documents, and access to these for research purposes is inadequate. Significant representational capabilities available to journal authors are unavailable to current non-fiction film or video work. Presents a model facilitating both intellectual access and the use of film/video for scholarly publishing
    Source
    ASIS'86. Proceedings of the 49th ASIS Annual Meeting. Vol.23. Chicago, Ill., 28.9.-2.10.1986. Ed. by J.M. Hurd and C.H. Davis
  18. Perreault, J.M.: ¬An introduction to Universal Decimal Classification (1969) 0.10
    0.10362983 = product of:
      0.20725965 = sum of:
        0.20725965 = product of:
          0.4145193 = sum of:
            0.4145193 = weight(_text_:j.m in 3535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4145193 = score(doc=3535,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05056156 = queryNorm
                1.3459523 = fieldWeight in 3535, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3535)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.10
    0.101242825 = sum of:
      0.046439677 = product of:
        0.18575871 = sum of:
          0.18575871 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18575871 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23050074 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.054803148 = product of:
        0.109606296 = sum of:
          0.109606296 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.109606296 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17705797 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  20. Xiao, L.; Farooq, U.; Carroll, J.M.; Rosson, M.B.: ¬The development of community members' roles in partnership research projects : an empirical study (2013) 0.10
    0.10111876 = sum of:
      0.038940854 = product of:
        0.15576342 = sum of:
          0.15576342 = weight(_text_:authors in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15576342 = score(doc=1106,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.23050074 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.67576104 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0621779 = product of:
        0.1243558 = sum of:
          0.1243558 = weight(_text_:j.m in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1243558 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.30797476 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05056156 = queryNorm
              0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    For 3 years, the authors of this article and several other colleagues have worked with 11 nonprofit community groups to help them take greater control of their information technology in terms of technology acceptance, adoption, and literacy through a research project. As part of this project, the authors explored informal learning methods that the groups could benefit from and practiced them with the community representatives who played key roles in the daily life of the organizations. In the present article, the authors reflect on the developmental trajectories observed for two individuals, each from a different nonprofit organization, with respect to information technology efficacy and ability. The authors analyze these trajectories as a sequence of the following four technology-related roles-technology consumers, technology planners, technology doers, and technology sustainers. The authors describe these roles, the methods used to promote informal learning, and implications for other researchers studying informal learning in communities.

Languages

Types

  • a 4202
  • m 467
  • el 210
  • s 209
  • b 40
  • x 37
  • i 25
  • r 23
  • ? 8
  • d 4
  • n 4
  • p 4
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • ag 1
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications