Search (5554 results, page 1 of 278)

  1. Álvarez, V. Pachón -> Pachón Álvarez, V.: 0.29
    0.28913012 = product of:
      0.57826024 = sum of:
        0.57826024 = sum of:
          0.42351133 = weight(_text_:v in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.42351133 = score(doc=282,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              1.8267851 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
          0.15474893 = weight(_text_:22 in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15474893 = score(doc=282,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 6.2012 14:35:22
  2. Wesch, M.: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us (2006) 0.25
    0.2463717 = sum of:
      0.053618282 = product of:
        0.2680914 = sum of:
          0.2680914 = weight(_text_:revise in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2680914 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3799309 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.70563203 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.19275342 = sum of:
        0.14117044 = weight(_text_:v in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14117044 = score(doc=3478,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.6089284 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
        0.051582977 = weight(_text_:22 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051582977 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
    
    Content
    Final version now available! http://youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g http://mediatedcultures.net A higher quality version is available for download here: http://www.mediafire.com/?6duzg3zioyd. Please note that this is the second draft and the final version will not be available until late February after I review all comments and revise the video. Please return for a new download link at that time.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
    Source
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE
  3. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.13
    0.13247986 = product of:
      0.26495972 = sum of:
        0.26495972 = sum of:
          0.17468952 = weight(_text_:v in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17468952 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.09027021 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09027021 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  4. Liu, V.: Cooperative Online Resource Catalog (CORC) : a community college's experience (2000) 0.13
    0.13247986 = product of:
      0.26495972 = sum of:
        0.26495972 = sum of:
          0.17468952 = weight(_text_:v in 3819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17468952 = score(doc=3819,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 3819, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3819)
          0.09027021 = weight(_text_:22 in 3819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09027021 = score(doc=3819,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3819, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3819)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Community and junior college libraries. 9(2000) no.3, S.5-22
  5. Wessels, V.: ¬The MIRACLE and the blind musician (2000) 0.13
    0.13247986 = product of:
      0.26495972 = sum of:
        0.26495972 = sum of:
          0.17468952 = weight(_text_:v in 7158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17468952 = score(doc=7158,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 7158, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7158)
          0.09027021 = weight(_text_:22 in 7158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09027021 = score(doc=7158,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7158, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.40-42
  6. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.13
    0.13209915 = sum of:
      0.018544981 = product of:
        0.092724904 = sum of:
          0.092724904 = weight(_text_:authors in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.092724904 = score(doc=3697,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2169568 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.113554165 = sum of:
        0.07486693 = weight(_text_:v in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07486693 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.038687233 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038687233 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
    
    Abstract
    In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  7. Albert, E.: Vpliv knjiznicarjevega vedenja na uspesnost referencne sluzbe v Slovenskih splosnoizobrazevalnih knjiznicah (1998) 0.13
    0.12666744 = sum of:
      0.013113283 = product of:
        0.06556641 = sum of:
          0.06556641 = weight(_text_:authors in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06556641 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2169568 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.113554165 = sum of:
        0.07486693 = weight(_text_:v in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07486693 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
        0.038687233 = weight(_text_:22 in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038687233 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
    
    Abstract
    The authors are students of librarianship in the faculty of philosophy at Ljubljana University, Slovenia. Users were asked to describe their library visits and summarise what was most helpful and least helpful about the service received. In the list of best practices, the most frequent feature was that the staff member really listened (58,9%). Other aspects of most helpful behaviour (e.g. using different body language, showing genuine interest, willingness to investigate further) occured in less than 40% of the interviews. 3 features of least helpful behaviour were listed in more than 30% of the cases; not asking the user anything about the question and making no effort to determine the specific need, not telling the user what he/she was doing, making no effort to determine whether the user had found the relevant information
    Date
    22. 2.1999 19:29:43
  8. He, L.; Nahar, V.: Reuse of scientific data in academic publications : an investigation of Dryad Digital Repository (2016) 0.13
    0.12666744 = sum of:
      0.013113283 = product of:
        0.06556641 = sum of:
          0.06556641 = weight(_text_:authors in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06556641 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2169568 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.113554165 = sum of:
        0.07486693 = weight(_text_:v in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07486693 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
        0.038687233 = weight(_text_:22 in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038687233 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - In recent years, a large number of data repositories have been built and used. However, the extent to which scientific data are re-used in academic publications is still unknown. The purpose of this paper is to explore the functions of re-used scientific data in scholarly publication in different fields. Design/methodology/approach - To address these questions, the authors identified 827 publications citing resources in the Dryad Digital Repository indexed by Scopus from 2010 to 2015. Findings - The results show that: the number of citations to scientific data increases sharply over the years, but mainly from data-intensive disciplines, such as agricultural, biology science, environment science and medicine; the majority of citations are from the originating articles; and researchers tend to reuse data produced by their own research groups. Research limitations/implications - Dryad data may be re-used without being formally cited. Originality/value - The conservatism in data sharing suggests that more should be done to encourage researchers to re-use other's data.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Hagenau, B.: ¬Der Deutsche Gesamtkatalog : Vergangenheit und Zukunft einer Idee (1988) 0.11
    0.113554165 = product of:
      0.22710833 = sum of:
        0.22710833 = sum of:
          0.14973386 = weight(_text_:v in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14973386 = score(doc=17,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 17, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17)
          0.077374466 = weight(_text_:22 in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.077374466 = score(doc=17,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 17, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    V,149 S
    Series
    Beiträge zum Buch- und Bibliothekswesen; 22
  10. Barden, B.R.; Denison, B.: Guide to the SLA loan collection of classification schemes and subject heading lists on deposit at Western Reserve Univ. as of March 20, 1961 (1961) 0.11
    0.113554165 = product of:
      0.22710833 = sum of:
        0.22710833 = sum of:
          0.14973386 = weight(_text_:v in 6157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14973386 = score(doc=6157,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 6157, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6157)
          0.077374466 = weight(_text_:22 in 6157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.077374466 = score(doc=6157,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6157, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6157)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.6, S.483-484 (A.R. Lindsay)
    Pages
    V,97 S
  11. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.11
    0.113554165 = product of:
      0.22710833 = sum of:
        0.22710833 = sum of:
          0.14973386 = weight(_text_:v in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14973386 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.077374466 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.077374466 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  12. Mea, V. Della -> Della Mea, V.: 0.11
    0.10587783 = product of:
      0.21175566 = sum of:
        0.21175566 = product of:
          0.42351133 = sum of:
            0.42351133 = weight(_text_:v in 4423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42351133 = score(doc=4423,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04759062 = queryNorm
                1.8267851 = fieldWeight in 4423, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. De Antonellis, V. -> Antonellis, V. De: 0.11
    0.10587783 = product of:
      0.21175566 = sum of:
        0.21175566 = product of:
          0.42351133 = sum of:
            0.42351133 = weight(_text_:v in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42351133 = score(doc=2346,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04759062 = queryNorm
                1.8267851 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Van Hyning, V. => Hyning, V. Van: 0.11
    0.10587783 = product of:
      0.21175566 = sum of:
        0.21175566 = product of:
          0.42351133 = sum of:
            0.42351133 = weight(_text_:v in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42351133 = score(doc=3656,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04759062 = queryNorm
                1.8267851 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Repiso, V. Ortiz- => Ortiz-Repiso, V.: 0.11
    0.10587783 = product of:
      0.21175566 = sum of:
        0.21175566 = product of:
          0.42351133 = sum of:
            0.42351133 = weight(_text_:v in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42351133 = score(doc=4867,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04759062 = queryNorm
                1.8267851 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Medeiros, V. Nunes => Nunes Medeiros, V.: 0.11
    0.10587783 = product of:
      0.21175566 = sum of:
        0.21175566 = product of:
          0.42351133 = sum of:
            0.42351133 = weight(_text_:v in 965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42351133 = score(doc=965,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04759062 = queryNorm
                1.8267851 = fieldWeight in 965, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Hessami, V. Frings- => Frings-Hessami, V.: 0.11
    0.10587783 = product of:
      0.21175566 = sum of:
        0.21175566 = product of:
          0.42351133 = sum of:
            0.42351133 = weight(_text_:v in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42351133 = score(doc=1083,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04759062 = queryNorm
                1.8267851 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Dodebei, V.; Orrico, E. Goyannes Dill: Knowledge in social memory : empirical experiment for a domain conceptual-discursive mapping (2014) 0.11
    0.105556205 = sum of:
      0.010927736 = product of:
        0.054638676 = sum of:
          0.054638676 = weight(_text_:authors in 1405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054638676 = score(doc=1405,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2169568 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1405, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1405)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.09462847 = sum of:
        0.06238911 = weight(_text_:v in 1405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06238911 = score(doc=1405,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 1405, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1405)
        0.032239363 = weight(_text_:22 in 1405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032239363 = score(doc=1405,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1405, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1405)
    
    Abstract
    Mapping a knowledge domain in the interdisciplinary field of Social Memory is discussed, considering the linguistic materiality and the conceptual relations that are most appropriate to its representation. Theoretical instruments for knowledge organization in the field of information as well as of memory are both central in contemporary social studies and they must help a clear representation of a domain, especially when it lies in disciplinary frontiers. Two perspectives were used as methodological procedures: the conceptual analysis regarding the categorization of the authors' intellectual production selected from syllabus of the discipline Social Memory and Institution; and discursive fragments selected from Paul Ricour's text memory and imagination . As main results, data analysis from the first corpus pointed out six main facets that organize the memory context; and the second corpus, related to discursive materiality, organizes Ricour's ideas of memory from some philosophical points of view. As conclusions, we consider that mapping key concepts and discourses towards the main categories (ontological) and towards a group of relations derived from the discursive analysis process has enabled a possible framework for social memory indexing/searching studies. Even though this proposal is specific to a topic in a teaching program, it indicates a promising path for upcoming studies in Knowledge Organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  19. Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018) 0.11
    0.105556205 = sum of:
      0.010927736 = product of:
        0.054638676 = sum of:
          0.054638676 = weight(_text_:authors in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054638676 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2169568 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.09462847 = sum of:
        0.06238911 = weight(_text_:v in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06238911 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
        0.032239363 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032239363 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
    
    Abstract
    Studies on the state and structure of digital knowledge concerning science generally relate to macro and meso scales. Supported by visualizations, these studies can deliver knowledge about emerging scientific fields or collaboration between countries, scientific centers, or groups of researchers. Analyses of individual activities or single scientific career paths are rarely presented and discussed. The authors decided to fill this gap and developed a web application for visualizing the scientific output of particular researchers. This free software based on bibliographic data from local databases, provides six layouts for analysis. Researchers can see the dynamic characteristics of their own writing activity, the time and place of publication, and the thematic scope of research problems. They can also identify cooperation networks, and consequently, study the dependencies and regularities in their own scientific activity. The current article presents the results of a study of the application's usability and functionality as well as attempts to define different user groups. A survey about the interface was sent to select researchers employed at Nicolaus Copernicus University. The results were used to answer the question as to whether such a specialized visualization tool can significantly augment the individual information space of the contemporary researcher.
    Date
    21.12.2018 17:22:13
  20. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.11
    0.105556205 = sum of:
      0.010927736 = product of:
        0.054638676 = sum of:
          0.054638676 = weight(_text_:authors in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054638676 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2169568 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04759062 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.09462847 = sum of:
        0.06238911 = weight(_text_:v in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06238911 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.032239363 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032239363 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16665424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04759062 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.

Languages

Types

  • a 4595
  • m 554
  • el 275
  • s 249
  • x 63
  • b 42
  • i 28
  • r 25
  • ? 9
  • d 5
  • n 5
  • p 5
  • u 2
  • v 2
  • z 2
  • ag 1
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications