Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × author_ss:"Zumer, M."
  1. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.06
    0.05533448 = sum of:
      0.025381705 = product of:
        0.10152682 = sum of:
          0.10152682 = weight(_text_:authors in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10152682 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.029952776 = product of:
        0.05990555 = sum of:
          0.05990555 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05990555 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  2. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.05
    0.046112068 = sum of:
      0.021151422 = product of:
        0.08460569 = sum of:
          0.08460569 = weight(_text_:authors in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08460569 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024960645 = product of:
        0.04992129 = sum of:
          0.04992129 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04992129 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  3. Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014) 0.04
    0.039127383 = sum of:
      0.017947575 = product of:
        0.0717903 = sum of:
          0.0717903 = weight(_text_:authors in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0717903 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021179808 = product of:
        0.042359617 = sum of:
          0.042359617 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042359617 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper attempts to explore an approach of using an automatic semantic analysis tool to enhance the "subject" access to materials that are not included in the usual library subject cataloging process. Using two research samples the authors analyzed the access points supplied by OpenCalais, a semantic analysis tool. As an aid in understanding how computerized subject analysis might be approached, this paper suggests using the three-layer framework that has been accepted and applied in image analysis, developed by Erwin Panofsky.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.01
    0.010589904 = product of:
      0.021179808 = sum of:
        0.021179808 = product of:
          0.042359617 = sum of:
            0.042359617 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042359617 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
  5. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.01
    0.010589904 = product of:
      0.021179808 = sum of:
        0.021179808 = product of:
          0.042359617 = sum of:
            0.042359617 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042359617 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Extending models for controlled vocabularies to classification systems : modeling DDC with FRSAD (2011) 0.01
    0.0074781566 = product of:
      0.014956313 = sum of:
        0.014956313 = product of:
          0.059825253 = sum of:
            0.059825253 = weight(_text_:authors in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059825253 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) conceptual model identifies entities, attributes and relationships as they relate to subject authority data. FRSAD includes two main entities, thema (any entity used as a subject of a work) and nomen (any sign or sequence of signs that a thema is known by, referred to, or addressed as). In a given controlled vocabulary and within a domain, a nomen is the appellation of only one thema. The authors consider the question, can the FRSAD conceptual model be extended beyond controlled vocabularies (its original focus) to model classification data? Models that are developed based on the structures and functions of controlled vocabularies (such as thesauri and subject heading systems) often need to be adjusted or extended to accommodate classification systems that have been developed with different focused functions, structures and fundamental theories. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system is used as a case study to test applicability of the FRSAD model for classification data, and as a springboard for a general discussion of issues related to the use of FRSAD for the representation of classification data.
  7. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Extending models for controlled vocabularies to classification systems : modelling DDC with FRSAD (2011) 0.01
    0.0074781566 = product of:
      0.014956313 = sum of:
        0.014956313 = product of:
          0.059825253 = sum of:
            0.059825253 = weight(_text_:authors in 4828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059825253 = score(doc=4828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4828)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) conceptual model identifies entities, attributes and relationships as they relate to subject authority data. FRSAD includes two main entities, thema (any entity used as a subject of a work) and nomen (any sign or sequence of signs that a thema is known by, referred to, or addressed as). In a given controlled vocabulary and within a domain, a nomen is the appellation of only one thema. The authors consider the question, can the FRSAD conceptual model be extended beyond controlled vocabularies (its original focus) to model classification data? Models that are developed based on the structures and functions of controlled vocabularies (such as thesauri and subject heading systems) often need to be adjusted or extended to accommodate classification systems that have been developed with different focused functions, structures and fundamental theories. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system is used as a case study to test applicability of the FRSAD model for classification data, and as a springboard for a general discussion of issues related to the use of FRSAD for the representation of classification data.
  8. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.: Application of FRBR and FRSAD to classification systems (2015) 0.01
    0.0074781566 = product of:
      0.014956313 = sum of:
        0.014956313 = product of:
          0.059825253 = sum of:
            0.059825253 = weight(_text_:authors in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059825253 = score(doc=2284,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) conceptual model defines entities, attributes and relationships as they relate to subject authority data. FRSAD includes two main entities, thema (any entity used as the subject of a work) and nomen (any sign or arrangement of signs that a thema is known by, referred to, or addressed as). In a given controlled vocabulary and within a domain, a nomen is the appellation of only one thema. The authors consider the question: can the FRSAD conceptual model be extended beyond controlled vocabularies (its original focus) to model classification data? Models that are developed based on the structures and functions of controlled vocabularies (such as thesauri and subject heading systems) often need to be adjusted or extended to accommodate classification systems that have been developed with different focused functions, structures and fundamental theories. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) are used as a case study to test applicability of the FRSAD model for classification data and the applicability of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) for modelling versions, such as different adaptations and different language editions.