Search (4797 results, page 1 of 240)

0.3061588 = product of:
  0.6123176 = sum of:
    0.6123176 = sum of:
      0.505534 = weight(_text_:s.d in 4023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.505534 = score(doc=4023,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          1.3469235 = fieldWeight in 4023, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4023)
      0.106783606 = weight(_text_:22 in 4023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.106783606 = score(doc=4023,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1724982 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4023, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4023)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

CD-ROM professional. 4(1991) no.1, S.16-22

0.2680999 = product of:
  0.5361998 = sum of:
    0.5361998 = product of:
      1.0723996 = sum of:
        1.0723996 = weight(_text_:s.d in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          1.0723996 = score(doc=2356,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            2.8572562 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.252767 = product of:
  0.505534 = sum of:
    0.505534 = product of:
      1.011068 = sum of:
        1.011068 = weight(_text_:s.d in 3366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          1.011068 = score(doc=3366,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            2.693847 = fieldWeight in 3366, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.25 = fieldNorm(doc=3366)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.19134924 = product of:
  0.38269848 = sum of:
    0.38269848 = sum of:
      0.31595874 = weight(_text_:s.d in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.31595874 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.84182715 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
      0.06673975 = weight(_text_:22 in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06673975 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1724982 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Journal of academic librarianship. 20(1994) no.1, S.22-23

0.1530794 = product of:
  0.3061588 = sum of:
    0.3061588 = sum of:
      0.252767 = weight(_text_:s.d in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.252767 = score(doc=3025,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.67346174 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
      0.053391803 = weight(_text_:22 in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053391803 = score(doc=3025,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1724982 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.1999 15:52:12

0.1530794 = product of:
  0.3061588 = sum of:
    0.3061588 = sum of:
      0.252767 = weight(_text_:s.d in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.252767 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.67346174 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.053391803 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053391803 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1724982 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.13037968 = sum of:
  0.019794127 = product of:
    0.07917651 = sum of:
      0.07917651 = weight(_text_:authors in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07917651 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22456466 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.110585555 = product of:
    0.22117111 = sum of:
      0.22117111 = weight(_text_:s.d in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22117111 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.589279 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Since the closing of the Sterling C. Evans Library author/title card catalog on march 6, 1989, librarians have observed a number of patrons who continued to use that catalog, even though NOTIS, the OPAC offered more comprehensive and current access to library holdings. To determine the reasons for this use, the authors prepared a one-page questionnaire, focusing on the users' preference for an inadequate card catalog in an environment which offers a superior OPAC. Card catalog patrons were then surveyed in order to gather data and build a user profile. Survey results were tabulated and analyzed, revealing the underlying reasons for users' preference for the card or online catalog. Conclusions will provide direction for improvements in users' access to online catalogs

0.1263835 = product of:
  0.252767 = sum of:
    0.252767 = product of:
      0.505534 = sum of:
        0.505534 = weight(_text_:s.d in 2210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.505534 = score(doc=2210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            1.3469235 = fieldWeight in 2210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2210)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.1263835 = product of:
  0.252767 = sum of:
    0.252767 = product of:
      0.505534 = sum of:
        0.505534 = weight(_text_:s.d in 3079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.505534 = score(doc=3079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            1.3469235 = fieldWeight in 3079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3079)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.1263835 = product of:
  0.252767 = sum of:
    0.252767 = product of:
      0.505534 = sum of:
        0.505534 = weight(_text_:s.d in 5161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.505534 = score(doc=5161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            1.3469235 = fieldWeight in 5161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5161)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.1263835 = product of:
  0.252767 = sum of:
    0.252767 = product of:
      0.505534 = sum of:
        0.505534 = weight(_text_:s.d in 5647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.505534 = score(doc=5647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            1.3469235 = fieldWeight in 5647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5647)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.1263835 = product of:
  0.252767 = sum of:
    0.252767 = product of:
      0.505534 = sum of:
        0.505534 = weight(_text_:s.d in 6401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.505534 = score(doc=6401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            1.3469235 = fieldWeight in 6401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6401)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.1263835 = product of:
  0.252767 = sum of:
    0.252767 = product of:
      0.505534 = sum of:
        0.505534 = weight(_text_:s.d in 8308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.505534 = score(doc=8308,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            1.3469235 = fieldWeight in 8308, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8308)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.1253125 = product of:
  0.250625 = sum of:
    0.250625 = product of:
      0.50125 = sum of:
        0.19559266 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19559266 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41762215 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.3056574 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3056574 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52206516 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.

0.11878173 = sum of:
  0.023994105 = product of:
    0.09597642 = sum of:
      0.09597642 = weight(_text_:authors in 6533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09597642 = score(doc=6533,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22456466 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 6533, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6533)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.09478763 = product of:
    0.18957525 = sum of:
      0.18957525 = weight(_text_:s.d in 6533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18957525 = score(doc=6533,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.5050963 = fieldWeight in 6533, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6533)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The WWW has become the most visible application of the Internet. In this article the authors provide background on hypermedia in general and review the emerging and still fragmentary literature related to WWW home page design. hrough the construction of a rating system, the authors measure the relative quality of a particular genre of home pages (those of higher education libraries) in terms of design and organization. The decision to study higher education library home pages was based on a variety of reasons, not the least of which is libarians's claimed expertise in the organization of information. If this is to be one of their strengths as they vie for leadership among the information professionals of the 21st century, one might expect that such a widely visible product of librarians' work would epitomize skillful packaging and presentation of information

0.110585555 = product of:
  0.22117111 = sum of:
    0.22117111 = product of:
      0.44234222 = sum of:
        0.44234222 = weight(_text_:s.d in 3246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44234222 = score(doc=3246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            1.178558 = fieldWeight in 3246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3246)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Managing information 5(1998) no.4, S.47 (S.D. James)

0.110585555 = product of:
  0.22117111 = sum of:
    0.22117111 = product of:
      0.44234222 = sum of:
        0.44234222 = weight(_text_:s.d in 410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44234222 = score(doc=410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049259447 = queryNorm
            1.178558 = fieldWeight in 410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=410)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10258575 = product of:
  0.2051715 = sum of:
    0.2051715 = sum of:
      0.15797937 = weight(_text_:s.d in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15797937 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.42091358 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
      0.04719213 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04719213 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1724982 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56

0.09898478 = sum of:
  0.01999509 = product of:
    0.07998036 = sum of:
      0.07998036 = weight(_text_:authors in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07998036 = score(doc=3458,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22456466 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.078989685 = product of:
    0.15797937 = sum of:
      0.15797937 = weight(_text_:s.d in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15797937 = score(doc=3458,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37532496 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.42091358 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.61935 = idf(docFreq=58, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Continued development of the Internet requires the development of efficient, easy-to-use search engines. Ideally, such development should call upon knowledge and skills from a variety of disciplines, including computer science, information science, psychology, and ergonomics. The current study is intended to determine whether search engines shows a pattern of interdisciplinarity. 2 disciplines were selected as the focus for the study: computer science, and library/information science. A citation analysis was conducted to measure levels of interdisciplinary research and publishing in Internet search engine design and development. The results show a higher level of interdisciplinarity among library and information scientists than among computer scientists or among any of those categorized as 'other'. This is reflected both in the types of journals in which the authors publish, and in the references they cite to support their work. However, almost no authors published articles or cited references in fields such as cognitive science, ergonomics, or psychology. The results of this study are analyzed in terms of the writings of Patrick Wilson, Bruno Latour, Pierre Bordieu, Fritz Ringer, and Thomas Pinelli, focusing on cognitive authority within a profession, interaction between disciplines, and information-gathering habits of professionals. Suggestions for further research are given

0.098635525 = sum of:
  0.045243718 = product of:
    0.18097487 = sum of:
      0.18097487 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18097487 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22456466 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.053391803 = product of:
    0.106783606 = sum of:
      0.106783606 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.106783606 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1724982 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049259447 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22