Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.02142768 = sum of:
  0.0070393602 = product of:
    0.028157441 = sum of:
      0.028157441 = weight(_text_:authors in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028157441 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049050607 = queryNorm
          0.12592064 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01438832 = product of:
    0.02877664 = sum of:
      0.02877664 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02877664 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049050607 = queryNorm
          0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

006.7 22

Date

7. 3.2007 19:30:22

DDC

006.7 22

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.3, S.457-458 (A.M.A. Ahmad): "The concept of the semantic web has emerged because search engines and text-based searching are no longer adequate, as these approaches involve an extensive information retrieval process. The deployed searching and retrieving descriptors arc naturally subjective and their deployment is often restricted to the specific application domain for which the descriptors were configured. The new era of information technology imposes different kinds of requirements and challenges. Automatic extracted audiovisual features are required, as these features are more objective, domain-independent, and more native to audiovisual content. This book is a useful guide for researchers, experts, students, and practitioners; it is a very valuable reference and can lead them through their exploration and research in multimedia content and the semantic web. The book is well organized, and introduces the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis to the reader through a logical sequence from standards and hypotheses through system examples, presenting relevant tools and methods. But in some chapters readers will need a good technical background to understand some of the details. Readers may attain sufficient knowledge here to start projects or research related to the book's theme; recent results and articles related to the active research area of integrating multimedia with semantic web technologies are included. This book includes full descriptions of approaches to specific problem domains such as content search, indexing, and retrieval. This book will be very useful to researchers in the multimedia content analysis field who wish to explore the benefits of emerging semantic web technologies in applying multimedia content approaches. The first part of the book covers the definition of the two basic terms multimedia content and semantic web. The Moving Picture Experts Group standards MPEG7 and MPEG21 are quoted extensively. In addition, the means of multimedia content description are elaborated upon and schematically drawn. This extensive description is introduced by authors who are actively involved in those standards and have been participating in the work of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/MPEG for many years. On the other hand, this results in bias against the ad hoc or nonstandard tools for multimedia description in favor of the standard approaches. This is a general book for multimedia content; more emphasis on the general multimedia description and extraction could be provided.

0.01329136 = product of:
  0.02658272 = sum of:
    0.02658272 = product of:
      0.05316544 = sum of:
        0.05316544 = weight(_text_:22 in 5627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05316544 = score(doc=5627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049050607 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

14. 2.2001 19:09:22

0.011262976 = product of:
  0.022525951 = sum of:
    0.022525951 = product of:
      0.090103805 = sum of:
        0.090103805 = weight(_text_:authors in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090103805 = score(doc=240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049050607 = queryNorm
            0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the nature and the characteristics of the numerous problems encountered when a user tries to access a collection of images in a multilingual environment. The authors identify major research questions to be investigated to improve image retrieval effectiveness in a multilingual environment.

0.00664568 = product of:
  0.01329136 = sum of:
    0.01329136 = product of:
      0.02658272 = sum of:
        0.02658272 = weight(_text_:22 in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02658272 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17176686 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049050607 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

12. 8.2012 18:05:22

0.005631488 = product of:
  0.011262976 = sum of:
    0.011262976 = product of:
      0.045051903 = sum of:
        0.045051903 = weight(_text_:authors in 6520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045051903 = score(doc=6520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22361259 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049050607 = queryNorm
            0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 6520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6520)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Relevance has been a difficult concept to define, let alone measure. In this paper, a simple operational definition of relevance is proposed for a Web-based library catalog: whether or not during a search session the user saves, prints, mails, or downloads a citation. If one of those actions is performed, the session is considered relevant to the user. An analysis is presented illustrating the advantages and disadvantages of this definition. With this definition and good transaction logging, it is possible to ascertain the relevance of a session. This was done for 905,970 sessions conducted with the University of California's Melvyl online catalog. Next, a methodology was developed to try to predict the relevance of a session. A number of variables were defined that characterize a session, none of which used any demographic information about the user. The values of the variables were computed for the sessions. Principal components analysis was used to extract a new set of variables out of the original set. A stratified random sampling technique was used to form ten strata such that each new strata of 90,570 sessions contained the same proportion of relevant to nonrelevant sessions. Logistic regression was used to ascertain the regression coefficients for nine of the ten strata. Then, the coefficients were used to predict the relevance of the sessions in the missing strata. Overall, 17.85% of the sessions were determined to be relevant. The predicted number of relevant sessions for all ten strata was 11 %, a 6.85% difference. The authors believe that the methodology can be further refined and the prediction improved. This methodology could also have significant application in improving user searching and also in predicting electronic commerce buying decisions without the use of personal demographic data