Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.15004618 = sum of:
  0.032155484 = product of:
    0.12862194 = sum of:
      0.12862194 = weight(_text_:authors in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12862194 = score(doc=818,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.56985176 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.1178907 = product of:
    0.2357814 = sum of:
      0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2357814 = score(doc=818,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents a citation analysis of indexing research in the ISKO Proceedings. Understanding that there are different traditions of research into indexing, we look for evidence of this in the citing and cited authors. Three areas of cited and citing authors surface, after applying Price's elitism analysis, each roughly corresponding to geographic distributions.

0.051579453 = sum of:
  0.03480933 = product of:
    0.13923731 = sum of:
      0.13923731 = weight(_text_:authors in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13923731 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.016770126 = product of:
    0.033540253 = sum of:
      0.033540253 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033540253 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.

0.030980978 = sum of:
  0.014210851 = product of:
    0.056843404 = sum of:
      0.056843404 = weight(_text_:authors in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056843404 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.016770126 = product of:
    0.033540253 = sum of:
      0.033540253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033540253 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper aims to study the conceptual dimension of Knowledge Organization (KO) in the ISKO proceedings (1990-2012) domain. After analyzing a corpus of 71 papers that presented the term "knowledge organization" in their titles, using the methodology of Bardin's content analysis, it was possible to obtain a set of 11 definitions of KO which were studied using the following categories: nature, object, tools, processes, and perspectives/approaches. These categories act as a basis to identify the communities of authors that interact in the domain under different conceptual perspectives. The results show that KO has been mainly understood as an area or field of knowledge whose objects are recorded knowledge and conceptual structures, and whose main processes are classification and indexing, as well as information retrieval. The nature of KO is mostly linked to the construction of specialized discourses and the methodological dimension of such area is related to the systematization of recorded scientific knowledge.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.010062075 = product of:
  0.02012415 = sum of:
    0.02012415 = product of:
      0.0402483 = sum of:
        0.0402483 = weight(_text_:22 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0402483 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.010062075 = product of:
  0.02012415 = sum of:
    0.02012415 = product of:
      0.0402483 = sum of:
        0.0402483 = weight(_text_:22 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0402483 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 2.2018 16:50:22