Search (149 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. IuD-relevante Softwareprodukte : Zusammenstellung von Softwareprodukten für die Anwendungsgebiete Archiv- und Bibliothekswesen, Information und Dokumentation (1994) 0.07
    0.06819771 = product of:
      0.13639542 = sum of:
        0.020073581 = weight(_text_:information in 7264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020073581 = score(doc=7264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 7264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7264)
        0.045251448 = weight(_text_:und in 7264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045251448 = score(doc=7264,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 7264, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7264)
        0.0710704 = product of:
          0.1421408 = sum of:
            0.1421408 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 7264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1421408 = score(doc=7264,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.72256243 = fieldWeight in 7264, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7264)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
  2. Farthofer, E.: Einrichtung einer Literaturdatenbank mit Reference Manager an der Abteilung für Gefäß- und Leistungsbiologie der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Paris-Lodron-Universität Salzburg (2004) 0.06
    0.058455184 = product of:
      0.11691037 = sum of:
        0.017205928 = weight(_text_:information in 4636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017205928 = score(doc=4636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4636)
        0.038786955 = weight(_text_:und in 4636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038786955 = score(doc=4636,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 4636, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4636)
        0.06091749 = product of:
          0.12183498 = sum of:
            0.12183498 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 4636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12183498 = score(doc=4636,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.6193392 = fieldWeight in 4636, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4636)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Imprint
    Potsdam : Fachhochschule, Institut für Information und Dokumentation
  3. Redlhammer, S.: Einführung von ALLEGRO-C in einer Spezialbibliothek (1992) 0.04
    0.039264005 = product of:
      0.11779201 = sum of:
        0.036568694 = weight(_text_:und in 8592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036568694 = score(doc=8592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 8592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8592)
        0.08122332 = product of:
          0.16244663 = sum of:
            0.16244663 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 8592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16244663 = score(doc=8592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.82578564 = fieldWeight in 8592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaus. 1992, H.48, S.25-28
  4. Lang, W.: Einrichtung eines Dokumentationsverwaltungs- und Dokumentationssystems auf einem PC : Anwendungsgestaltung mit der Software MICRO-ISIS (1991) 0.04
    0.03877395 = product of:
      0.11632185 = sum of:
        0.045251448 = weight(_text_:und in 8591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045251448 = score(doc=8591,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 8591, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8591)
        0.0710704 = product of:
          0.1421408 = sum of:
            0.1421408 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 8591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1421408 = score(doc=8591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.72256243 = fieldWeight in 8591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaues. 1991, H.47, S.65-77
  5. Adam, M.; Musiat, J.; Stöhr, M.; Wenzel, C.: Literaturverwaltungsprogramme im Überblick (2016) 0.04
    0.037432563 = product of:
      0.112297684 = sum of:
        0.05171594 = weight(_text_:und in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05171594 = score(doc=3298,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
        0.060581744 = product of:
          0.12116349 = sum of:
            0.12116349 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12116349 = score(doc=3298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24026412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.5042929 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Das Dokument enthält einen Vergleich von sechs Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen - Zotero, Citavi, Mendeley, RefWorks, EndNote und JabRef. Es wurden Versionen mit Stand 11/2016 getestet. Folgende Kriterien wurden berücksichtigt: Allgemeines und Installation, Import- / Exportmöglichkeiten, Dateneingabe und -bearbeitung, Anzeige und Suche, Kooperation, Zitieren und Literaturlisten, weitere Funktionen und Benutzung. Der Vergleich schließt mit einer Gesamtbewertung der Stärken und Schwächen und gibt zielgruppenspezifische Auswahlempfehlungen.
  6. Lang, W.: Verwendung von PC-Software für Dokumentationszwecke an Instituten : Grundlegende Fragen zur Literaturerfassung & -dokumentation mit dem PC an kleineren Institutsbibliotheken und Dokumentationsstellen und Anmerkungen zu konkreten Softwareangeboten (1993) 0.03
    0.03215848 = product of:
      0.09647544 = sum of:
        0.045710865 = weight(_text_:und in 7783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045710865 = score(doc=7783,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 7783, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7783)
        0.050764572 = product of:
          0.101529144 = sum of:
            0.101529144 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 7783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101529144 = score(doc=7783,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.516116 = fieldWeight in 7783, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7783)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Der Österreichische Bibliothekartag 1988, Linz, 5.-10. September 1988, Vorträge und Kommissionssitzungen, Pre-Conference Seminar. Hrsg.: Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
  7. Hitz, K.: AskSam 4.2/5.0 : der 'Personal Information Manager' für den PC (1991) 0.03
    0.030381327 = product of:
      0.09114398 = sum of:
        0.020073581 = weight(_text_:information in 5) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020073581 = score(doc=5,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5)
        0.0710704 = product of:
          0.1421408 = sum of:
            0.1421408 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 5) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1421408 = score(doc=5,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.72256243 = fieldWeight in 5, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 42(1991), S.322-324
  8. Sawallisch, U.: ¬Das Retrievalsystem FREITEXT im Einsatz in einer kleinen Dokumentationsstelle (1993) 0.03
    0.030117115 = product of:
      0.09035134 = sum of:
        0.03958677 = weight(_text_:und in 8588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03958677 = score(doc=8588,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 8588, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8588)
        0.050764572 = product of:
          0.101529144 = sum of:
            0.101529144 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 8588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101529144 = score(doc=8588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.516116 = fieldWeight in 8588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Seit 2 Jahren arbeitet die Dokumentationsstelle Obstbau, Berlin, mit dem Datenbanksystem FREITEXT. Das System verwaltet alle Literaturdaten der Dokumentationsstelle seit 1984. Die Daten konnten aus verschiedenen Quellen zusammengeführt werden und stehen dem Benutzer als lokale Datenbank zur Verfügung. FREITEXT hat sich als preiswertes, komfortables und zuverlässiges Retrievalsystem erwiesen
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaues. 1993, H.49, S.43-49
  9. Rohlfien, K.: Sacherschließung der Monographien, Serienwerke und Stücktitel der Entomologischen Bibliothek mit dem Literaturverwaltungssystem VCH-BIBLIO (1994) 0.03
    0.030117115 = product of:
      0.09035134 = sum of:
        0.03958677 = weight(_text_:und in 8970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03958677 = score(doc=8970,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 8970, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8970)
        0.050764572 = product of:
          0.101529144 = sum of:
            0.101529144 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 8970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101529144 = score(doc=8970,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.516116 = fieldWeight in 8970, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von der Situation der Entomologischen Bibliothek werden sowohl die Stellung des Sachkataloges im Literatursystem der Projektgruppe Entomologie als auch die Anforderungen an eine Sacherschließung erörtert und die Anpassung des Literaturverwaltungssystems VCH-BIBLIO sowie die erarbeiteten Ordnungsmittel beschrieben
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaues. 1994, H.50, S.18-23
  10. Müller, H. u. D. Strauch (Red.): Mikro- und minicomputer : Programme für Datenbankaufbau und Retrieval, Auswahl und Anwendung. KTK-Workshop am 18. u. 19.6.1985 in Frankfurt (1985) 0.03
    0.030117115 = product of:
      0.09035134 = sum of:
        0.03958677 = weight(_text_:und in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03958677 = score(doc=31,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
        0.050764572 = product of:
          0.101529144 = sum of:
            0.101529144 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101529144 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.516116 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Editor
    Deutsche Gesellschaft für Dokumentation / Komitee Technische Kommunikation. Red.: H. Müller u. D. Strauch
  11. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.03
    0.026029354 = product of:
      0.07808806 = sum of:
        0.032443807 = weight(_text_:information in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032443807 = score(doc=3254,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
        0.045644253 = product of:
          0.09128851 = sum of:
            0.09128851 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09128851 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  12. Freese, E.; Göbel, E.: Literaturdokumentation mit LIDOS und Archivierung am Beispiel des Spezialarchives Arbeit und Gesundheit : Handlungsanleitung (1998) 0.02
    0.024746176 = product of:
      0.074238524 = sum of:
        0.045710865 = weight(_text_:und in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045710865 = score(doc=8,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
        0.028527658 = product of:
          0.057055317 = sum of:
            0.057055317 = weight(_text_:22 in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057055317 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    17. 7.2002 15:38:22
    RSWK
    Magdeburg / Spezialarchiv Arbeit und Gesundheit / Graue Literatur / Inhaltserschliessung / Computerunterstütztes Verfahren (34512) (45312)
    Subject
    Magdeburg / Spezialarchiv Arbeit und Gesundheit / Graue Literatur / Inhaltserschliessung / Computerunterstütztes Verfahren (34512) (45312)
  13. Reinicke, W.; Strauch, D.: ¬Das Datenbanksystem MIDOS97 : Funktionen und Leistungsmerkmale (1997) 0.02
    0.018664295 = product of:
      0.055992883 = sum of:
        0.017205928 = weight(_text_:information in 934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017205928 = score(doc=934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=934)
        0.038786955 = weight(_text_:und in 934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038786955 = score(doc=934,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 934, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=934)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 48(1997) H.6, S.358-362
  14. Hobohm, H.-C.: Jedem seine Datenbank! : Bibliographie-Software im Vergleich: EndNote, ProCite und Reference Manager (2000) 0.02
    0.018664295 = product of:
      0.055992883 = sum of:
        0.017205928 = weight(_text_:information in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017205928 = score(doc=5434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
        0.038786955 = weight(_text_:und in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038786955 = score(doc=5434,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 51(2000) H.7, S.431-434
  15. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.014229941 = product of:
      0.042689823 = sum of:
        0.019867694 = weight(_text_:information in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019867694 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.022822127 = product of:
          0.045644253 = sum of:
            0.045644253 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045644253 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  16. Hobohm, H.-C.: Persönliche Literaturverwaltung im Umbruch vom Bibliographie-Management zum Social Bookmarking : Anmerkungen zu EndNote, Reference Manager, RefWorks und Connotea (2005) 0.01
    0.013295658 = product of:
      0.039886974 = sum of:
        0.0050183954 = weight(_text_:information in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050183954 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.06788416 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
        0.03486858 = weight(_text_:und in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03486858 = score(doc=4368,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.3735868 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Im Sommer 2005 ist die neueste Version des weit verbreiteten persönlichen Literaturverwaltungssystems EndNote erschienen. Noch im Jahre 2000 musste diese Gattung von Software genauer beschrieben und für deutsche Wissenschaftler erklärt werden. Mittlerweile hat sich deren Gebrauch sogar institutionell verbreitet. So bietet der GBV EndNote und Reference Manager Connection Files, der edoc-Server der HU Berlin schreibt die Benutzung eigener Formate zur Ablieferung von Dissertationsliteraturlisten vor und die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft nutzt EndNote und Reference Manager offiziell für ihre Jahres-Berichte um nur einige Beispiele zu nennen. Obwohl viele (Natur-)Wissenschaftler eher von BiB-TeX oder "freien" Bibliographiemanagementsystemen kommen, scheinen sich diese beiden doch immer mehr durchzusetzen. Es erstaunt etwas, dass Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftler sich dieser Systeme offenbar weniger bedienen, obwohl bekannt ist, dass deren Forschungsfront gerade eher auf bibliographische Vollständigkeit angewiesen ist als die der Naturwissenschaftler. Der Wettlauf zwischen EndNote und dem Konkurrenzprodukt aus dem Hause ISI ist jedoch nicht beendet wie ich noch vor Jahren spekulierte. ISI bzw. Thomson als dem Produzenten von Reference Manager hatte die beiden Konkurrenten EndNote und ProCite aufgekauft und man konnte erwarten, dass sich die Systeme angleichen und dem Nutzer der Übergang zu einem zentral gepflegten ISI Angebot erleichtert wird. In gewissen Teilen hat tatsächlich eine Angleichung stattgefunden. Die als herausragend empfundene Eigenschaft von Profite in höherem Maße inhaltliche Erschließung zu unterstützen ist mittlerweile auch bei den beiden anderen implementiert. Die einzigen verbleibenden Unterschiede (marketingtechnisch gesprochen: USPs - unique selling propositions) sind die Fähigkeit ProCites, Webseiten "on-the-fly" zu katalogisieren-sofern diese Metadaten aufweisen, die Web Publisher Funktion und erhöhte Netzwerkfähigkeit von Reference Manager sowie die Palm Version und die leicht größeren technischen Kapazitäten von Endnote und dessen Fähigkeit Abbildungen und Objekte direkt einzufügen. Zumindest ist zwischen EndNote und Reference Manager die Entscheidung nicht gefallen, da beide auf eigene Weise weiterentwickelt werden, während Profite seit sechs Jahren kein Update mehr erfahren hat. EndNote ist in den fünf Jahren seit der letzten Besprechung um 5 Versionsnummern auf Nummer 9 gewachsen. Reference Manager hat es auf elf (von 9.5) geschafft. In anderthalb Jahren wird EndNote also Reference Manager überholt haben. Man fragt sich, was die Unterschiede ausmacht, die solche Sprünge in den Versionsbezeichnungen rechtfertigen. Meist handelt es sich um die Einbindung neuer connection files und Importfilter, die Vorgabe neuer Medienformen und neuer bibliographischer Stile (Formatvorlagen): also neben der Anpassung an weiterentwickelte Betriebssysteme eher um quantitative Verbesserungen. Vielleicht ist der Vergleich gewagt, aber mir drängt sich die Parallele zu Virusprogrammen auf: Was wäre wenn diese bei jedem update des virus defintion files eine neue Versionsnummer erhielten? Andere Neuerungen wie die Unterstützung von XML, WSDL, openURL und teilweise auch Unicode werden von den Kunden sicher als selbstverständlich vorausgesetzt oder aber gar nicht bemerkt. Der Abstand der aktuellen Versionsnummer zur eigenen Version erhöht oft nur den psychologischen Druck, endlich auf die neue Fassung umzusteigen. Die meist um die 200 EUR (120 EUR für das update) dafür sind nicht immer gerechtfertigt.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.7, S.365-370
  17. Wollweber, M.: Organisationstalente : Wer Informationen sammelt, braucht Ordnung - Diese Programme machen es leichter (2017) 0.01
    0.012442863 = product of:
      0.037328586 = sum of:
        0.011470618 = weight(_text_:information in 3956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011470618 = score(doc=3956,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3956, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3956)
        0.02585797 = weight(_text_:und in 3956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02585797 = score(doc=3956,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3956, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3956)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Gleich ob privat, im Job, in der Schule oder im Studium - die meisten von uns wollen oder müssen bei ihren Projekte mit einer Unzahl an Daten, Informationen, Bildern und Grafiken umgehen. Wir stellen vier Programme (Personal Information Manager) vor, die sich diesen Aufgaben stellen, weil sie als Informationssammler und Wissensmanager konzipiert sind.
  18. Lauro, A. Di: IDIN manual for the creation and management of a bibliographic database using Micro-ISIS (1988) 0.01
    0.012273297 = product of:
      0.03681989 = sum of:
        0.014194165 = weight(_text_:information in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014194165 = score(doc=4292,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
        0.022625724 = weight(_text_:und in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022625724 = score(doc=4292,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die UNESCO vertreibt kostenfrei die Software Micro-ISIS für PCs. Zur Anwendung in kleinen Dokumentationseinrichtungen unter dem Dach des International Development Information Network (IDIN) wurde ein eigenes IDIN-Format geschaffen, das unter dieser Software eingesetzt werden kann. Besonders berücksichtigt sind dabei unselbständige Werke und die Sacherschließung mit Hilfe des 'OECD Macrothesaurus for Information Processing in the Field of Economic and Social Development'. Das Format ist abgeleitet vom 'Common Communication Format (CCF)', das ebenfalls im Auftrag der Unesco entwickelt wurde. IDIN ist eine vereinfachte Version und hat eine andere Behandlung mehrteiliger Werke
  19. Nieuwenhuysen, P.: Computerised storage and retrieval of structured text information : CDS/ISIS version 2.3 (1991) 0.01
    0.011502083 = product of:
      0.03450625 = sum of:
        0.016221903 = weight(_text_:information in 5042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016221903 = score(doc=5042,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5042, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5042)
        0.018284347 = weight(_text_:und in 5042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018284347 = score(doc=5042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 5042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5042)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The computer software package CDS/ISIS is suitable for the storage and retrieval of structured, text-oriented information, such as bibliographic descriptions. Versions exist for various hardware including IBM microcomputers and compatibles. The software is very attractive, mainly because it is powerful and because the producer, Unesco, normally fulfils requests to use it for free. Micro CDS/ISIS is reviewed in this paper which includes recent experience with version 2.3
    Footnote
    Enthält als Liste eine Zusammenstellung von allgemeiner und speziell bibliographischer Datenbanken-Software
  20. Kiem, C.M.; Middleton, M.: ¬An evaluation of textual storage and retrieval software : CDS/ISIS and InMagic (1998) 0.01
    0.0114309145 = product of:
      0.034292743 = sum of:
        0.011470618 = weight(_text_:information in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011470618 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
        0.022822127 = product of:
          0.045644253 = sum of:
            0.045644253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045644253 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    A comparison was made between CDS/ISIS, ist Windows version WINISIS, and InMagic's INMAGIC and DB/TextWorks software. Packages were evaluated for their database creation, information retrieval and report production capabilities. Windows versions were found to provide significant enhancements over DOS versions of software. The evaluation aimed to determine the advantages to a developing country of creating bibliographic databases using commercial software
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:54:49

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 87
  • d 49
  • i 3
  • nl 2
  • ru 2
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 115
  • m 18
  • el 8
  • s 5
  • x 4
  • ? 1
  • h 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications