-
Kuhlen, R.: Linguistische Grundlagen (1980)
0.06
0.061570793 = product of:
0.12314159 = sum of:
0.020073581 = weight(_text_:information in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020073581 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
0.031997606 = weight(_text_:und in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031997606 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
0.0710704 = product of:
0.1421408 = sum of:
0.1421408 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1421408 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.72256243 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: eine Einführung. 2. Aufl
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The analytico-synthetic foundation for large indexing & information retrieval systems : dedicated to Prof. Dr. Werner Schultheis, the vigorous initiator of modern chem. documentation in Germany on the occasion of his 85th birthday (1983)
0.05
0.054470308 = product of:
0.108940616 = sum of:
0.025649082 = weight(_text_:information in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025649082 = score(doc=215,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.02585797 = weight(_text_:und in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02585797 = score(doc=215,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.05743356 = product of:
0.11486712 = sum of:
0.11486712 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11486712 = score(doc=215,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.58391863 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- LCSH
- Information retrieval
- RSWK
- Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
- Subject
- Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
Information retrieval
-
Burkart, M.: Dokumentationssprachen (1990)
0.05
0.052774966 = product of:
0.10554993 = sum of:
0.017205928 = weight(_text_:information in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017205928 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.027426518 = weight(_text_:und in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027426518 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.06091749 = product of:
0.12183498 = sum of:
0.12183498 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12183498 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.6193392 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
-
Haldenwanger, H.H.M.: Begriff und Sprache in der Dokumentation (1961)
0.05
0.050478607 = product of:
0.15143582 = sum of:
0.036568694 = weight(_text_:und in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036568694 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.11486712 = product of:
0.22973424 = sum of:
0.22973424 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22973424 = score(doc=690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
1.1678373 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 12(1961) H.2, S.65-68
-
Körner, H.G.: Syntax und Gewichtung in Informationssprachen : Ein Fortschrittsbericht über präzisere Indexierung und Computer-Suche (1985)
0.04
0.03877395 = product of:
0.11632185 = sum of:
0.045251448 = weight(_text_:und in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045251448 = score(doc=281,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
0.0710704 = product of:
0.1421408 = sum of:
0.1421408 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1421408 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.72256243 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 36(1985), S.82-100
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.03
0.034597527 = product of:
0.069195054 = sum of:
0.010036791 = weight(_text_:information in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010036791 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.039188903 = weight(_text_:und in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039188903 = score(doc=4792,freq=12.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.01996936 = product of:
0.03993872 = sum of:
0.03993872 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03993872 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999)
0.03
0.027883371 = product of:
0.08365011 = sum of:
0.019393478 = weight(_text_:und in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019393478 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.06425664 = product of:
0.12851328 = sum of:
0.12851328 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12851328 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24026412 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.5348834 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Classification
- AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis
- RVK
- AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.02
0.023002477 = product of:
0.046004955 = sum of:
0.010036791 = weight(_text_:information in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010036791 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.015998803 = weight(_text_:und in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015998803 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.01996936 = product of:
0.03993872 = sum of:
0.03993872 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03993872 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Busch, A.: Terminologiemanagement : erfolgreicher Wissenstransfer durch Concept-Maps und die Überlegungen in DGI-AKTS (2021)
0.02
0.019948816 = product of:
0.059846446 = sum of:
0.011470618 = weight(_text_:information in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011470618 = score(doc=422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
0.04837583 = weight(_text_:und in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04837583 = score(doc=422,freq=14.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.51830536 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Die Organisation eines effektiven und effizienten Wissenstransfers ist eine große Herausforderung moderner Fachkommunikation. Durch die Aufbereitung von Begriffen und Begriffsbeziehungen in Begriffssystemen und deren übersichtliche und verständliche Visualisierung in einer Concept-Map macht das Terminologiemanagement Wissen einfach und schnell verfügbar. So kann es effizienter für die Fachkommunikation genutzt werden.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.4, S.185-193
-
Engerer, V.: Thesauri, Terminologien, Lexika, Fachsprachen : Kontrolle, physische Verortung und das Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung von Vokabularen (2014)
0.02
0.017895909 = product of:
0.053687725 = sum of:
0.01490077 = weight(_text_:information in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01490077 = score(doc=3644,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.038786955 = weight(_text_:und in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038786955 = score(doc=3644,freq=16.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Ich unternehme in diesem Beitrag den Versuch, die Informationswissenschaft - hier gedeutet als 'Information Retrieval'- Disziplin - einer synchronen Querschnittsanalyse zu unterziehen, welche die aktuelle Position dieser Disziplin im Feld anderer zeichen- und wortschatzorientierter Disziplinen (neben der Linguistik die Terminologielehre und die Fachsprachenforschung) näher bestimmen soll. Im Rahmen der Analyse wird von einem Information Retrieval-Kern der Informationswissenschaft ausgegangen, welcher den Informationssuchkontext sowie die Konzepte des Informationsbedarfs und der Relevanz als für diese Disziplin zentrale Komponenten ansieht. Synchron wird das Verhältnis der Informationswissenschaft zu benachbarten Disziplinen durch eine Reihe disziplinspezifischer Zeichenanforderungen erklärt, wodurch ein systemischer Zusammenhang entsteht, der die Informationswissenschaft mit den drei anderen zeichenbezogenen und vokabularorientierten Disziplinen in Beziehung setzt. Das Verhältnis zwischen diesen Disziplinen wird anhand der Dimensionen Kontrolle/Verbindlichkeit sowie Verortung des Vokabulars ("im Kopf" vs. in externen Dokumenten) aufgezeigt, und es wird ein übergeordnetes Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung, welches die beiden Dimensionen vereint, vorgeschlagen.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.2, S.99-108
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990)
0.02
0.017357063 = product of:
0.052071188 = sum of:
0.020073581 = weight(_text_:information in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020073581 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.031997606 = weight(_text_:und in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031997606 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.45, [=Suppl.10]
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Salton, G.: Experiments in automatic thesaurus construction for information retrieval (1972)
0.02
0.017357063 = product of:
0.052071188 = sum of:
0.020073581 = weight(_text_:information in 5314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020073581 = score(doc=5314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5314)
0.031997606 = weight(_text_:und in 5314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031997606 = score(doc=5314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5314)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008)
0.02
0.016408566 = product of:
0.049225695 = sum of:
0.010036791 = weight(_text_:information in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010036791 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
0.039188903 = weight(_text_:und in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039188903 = score(doc=2461,freq=12.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008)
0.02
0.015796639 = product of:
0.047389917 = sum of:
0.008602964 = weight(_text_:information in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008602964 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
0.038786955 = weight(_text_:und in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038786955 = score(doc=1837,freq=16.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
- Imprint
- Köln : Fachhochschule, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Institut für Informationswissenschaft
- Series
- Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd. 54
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.01
0.014010437 = product of:
0.028020874 = sum of:
0.010036791 = weight(_text_:information in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010036791 = score(doc=3644,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.007999402 = weight(_text_:und in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007999402 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.00998468 = product of:
0.01996936 = sum of:
0.01996936 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01996936 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Grenzen des Thesaurus-Verfahrens bei der Wiedergabe von Begriffsrelationen (1975)
0.01
0.01353722 = product of:
0.08122332 = sum of:
0.08122332 = product of:
0.16244663 = sum of:
0.16244663 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16244663 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.82578564 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.2-7
-
Dietze, J.: Informationsrecherchesprache und deren Lexik : Bemerkungen zur Terminologiediskussion (1980)
0.01
0.011595376 = product of:
0.034786128 = sum of:
0.02107287 = weight(_text_:information in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02107287 = score(doc=32,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
0.013713259 = weight(_text_:und in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013713259 = score(doc=32,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Information research consists of the comparison of 2 sources of information - that of formal description and content analysis and that based on the needs of the user. Information research filters identical elements from the sources by means of document and research cross-sections. Establishing such cross-sections for scientific documents and research questions is made possible by classification. Through the definition of the terms 'class' and 'classification' it becomes clear that the terms 'hierarchic classification' and 'classification' cannot be used synonymously. The basic types of information research languages are both hierarchic and non-hierarchic arising from the structure of lexicology and the paradigmatic relations of the lexicological units. The names for the lexicological units ('descriptor' and 'subject haedings') are synonymous, but it is necessary to differentiate between the terms 'descriptor language' and 'information research thesaurus'. The principles of precoordination and post-coordination as applied to word formation are unsuitable for the typification of information research languages
-
Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997)
0.01
0.010672456 = product of:
0.032017365 = sum of:
0.01490077 = weight(_text_:information in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01490077 = score(doc=2246,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.017116595 = product of:
0.03423319 = sum of:
0.03423319 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03423319 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Discusses the apparently unattainable goal of compatibility of information languages. While controlled languages can improve retrieval performance within a single system, they make cooperation across different systems more difficult. The Internet and downloading accentuate this adverse outcome and the acceleration of data exchange aggravates the problem of compatibility. Defines this familiar concept and demonstrates that coherence is just as necessary as it was for indexing languages, the proliferation of which has created confusion in grouped data banks. Describes 2 types of potential solutions, similar to those applied to automatic translation of natural languages: - harmonizing the information languages themselves, both difficult and expensive, or, the more flexible solution involving automatic harmonization of indexing formulae based on pre established concordance tables. However, structural incompatibilities between post coordinated languages and classifications may lead any harmonization tools up a blind alley, while the paths of a universal concordance model are rare and narrow
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Integration of information data banks and compatibility of indexing languages
-
Engerer, V.: Control and syntagmatization : vocabulary requirements in information retrieval thesauri and natural language lexicons (2017)
0.01
0.010306396 = product of:
0.030919187 = sum of:
0.017205928 = weight(_text_:information in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017205928 = score(doc=3678,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
0.013713259 = weight(_text_:und in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013713259 = score(doc=3678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the relationships between natural language lexicons in lexical semantics and thesauri in information retrieval research. These different areas of knowledge have different restrictions on use of vocabulary; thesauri are used only in information search and retrieval contexts, whereas lexicons are mental systems and generally applicable in all domains of life. A set of vocabulary requirements that defines the more concrete characteristics of vocabulary items in the 2 contexts can be derived from this framework: lexicon items have to be learnable, complex, transparent, etc., whereas thesaurus terms must be effective, current and relevant, searchable, etc. The differences in vocabulary properties correlate with 2 other factors, the well-known dimension of Control (deliberate, social activities of building and maintaining vocabularies), and Syntagmatization, which is less known and describes vocabulary items' varying formal preparedness to exit the thesaurus/lexicon, enter into linear syntactic constructions, and, finally, acquire communicative functionality. It is proposed that there is an inverse relationship between Control and Syntagmatization.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.6, S.1480-1490
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Peters, I.; Weller. K.: Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organization systems (2008)
0.01
0.008678531 = product of:
0.026035594 = sum of:
0.010036791 = weight(_text_:information in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010036791 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
0.015998803 = weight(_text_:und in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015998803 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.042111535 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.2, S.100-107
