Search (5302 results, page 1 of 266)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.51
    0.5087691 = product of:
      0.7631536 = sum of:
        0.13376856 = product of:
          0.40130565 = sum of:
            0.40130565 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.40130565 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.40130565 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40130565 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.027426518 = weight(_text_:und in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027426518 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.20065282 = product of:
          0.40130565 = sum of:
            0.40130565 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.40130565 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.38
    0.38486385 = product of:
      0.46183664 = sum of:
        0.07803166 = product of:
          0.23409498 = sum of:
            0.23409498 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23409498 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.23409498 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23409498 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.010036791 = weight(_text_:information in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010036791 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.022625724 = weight(_text_:und in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022625724 = score(doc=5955,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.11704749 = product of:
          0.23409498 = sum of:
            0.23409498 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23409498 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    Diskussionen um Datennetze und Informationstechnik drehen sich häufig um kompetentes Handeln. In der Publikation werden Voraussetzungen eines autonomen informationellen Handelns gezeigt: Abstrahieren, Analogien bilden, Plausibilitäten beachten, Schlussfolgern und kreativ sein. Informationelle Kompetenz ist gelebte Informationelle Autonomie. Es lassen sich Konsequenzen für ein zukünftiges Menschenbild in informationstechnischen Umgebungen ziehen.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
    Theme
    Information
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.32
    0.32304478 = product of:
      0.48456714 = sum of:
        0.06688428 = product of:
          0.20065282 = sum of:
            0.20065282 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20065282 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.28376594 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28376594 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.033590488 = weight(_text_:und in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033590488 = score(doc=484,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.10032641 = product of:
          0.20065282 = sum of:
            0.20065282 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20065282 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    Eine der wesentlichen Aufgaben als Fachreferent*in ist die inhaltliche Erschließung der neuerworbenen Literatur, sowie die Begutachtung und Auswahl der neu erschienenen Werke in den jeweiligen Fachgebieten hinsichtlich der Relevanz für die eigenen Sammlungen gemäß dem Sammlungsprofil der TU Wien Bibliothek. Im Zuge der Corona-Krise wurde die herkömmliche Arbeitsweise in der Sacherschließung beeinträchtigt, und es haben sich neue Herausforderungen, aber auch Möglichkeiten ergeben. Neben der fehlenden Autopsie der Literatur leidet auch die Sichtung und Erwerbung neuer Literatur unter der physischen Abwesenheit vom Arbeitsplatz bzw. der entsprechenden technischen Infrastruktur. Auch der persönliche Austausch mit den Kolleg*innen wurde deutlich erschwert. Neben den Schwierigkeiten wurden aber auch die neuen Handlungsoptionen auf beruflicher und individueller Ebene positiv gesehen. In dem Artikel werden unsere individuellen Erfahrungen an der TU Wien Bibliothek sowie Ausblicke in die Zukunft wiedergegeben.
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 73(2020) H.3/4, S.496-503
  4. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.31
    0.30655295 = product of:
      0.6131059 = sum of:
        0.1114738 = product of:
          0.3344214 = sum of:
            0.3344214 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3344214 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.3344214 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3344214 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.1672107 = product of:
          0.3344214 = sum of:
            0.3344214 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3344214 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  5. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.25
    0.2509777 = product of:
      0.3764665 = sum of:
        0.06688428 = product of:
          0.20065282 = sum of:
            0.20065282 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20065282 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.20065282 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20065282 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.008602964 = weight(_text_:information in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008602964 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.10032641 = product of:
          0.20065282 = sum of:
            0.20065282 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20065282 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  6. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.22
    0.21756423 = product of:
      0.32634634 = sum of:
        0.0557369 = product of:
          0.1672107 = sum of:
            0.1672107 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1672107 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1672107 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1672107 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.019793386 = weight(_text_:und in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019793386 = score(doc=4388,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.08360535 = product of:
          0.1672107 = sum of:
            0.1672107 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1672107 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    Werden Maschinen mit Begriffen beschrieben, die ursprünglich der Beschreibung des Menschen dienen, so liegt zunächst der Verdacht nahe, dass jene Maschinen spezifischmenschliche Fähigkeiten oder Eigenschaften besitzen. Für körperliche Fähigkeiten, die mechanisch nachgeahmt werden, hat sich in der Alltagssprache eine anthropomorphisierende Sprechweise bereits etabliert. So wird kaum in Frage gestellt, dass bestimmte Maschinen weben, backen, sich bewegen oder arbeiten können. Bei nichtkörperlichen Eigenschaften, etwa kognitiver, sozialer oder moralischer Art sieht dies jedoch anders aus. Dass mittlerweile intelligente und rechnende Maschinen im alltäglichen Sprachgebrauch Eingang gefunden haben, wäre jedoch undenkbar ohne den langjährigen Diskurs über Künstliche Intelligenz, welcher insbesondere die zweite Hälfte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts geprägt hat. In jüngster Zeit ist es der Autonomiebegriff, welcher zunehmend Verwendung zur Beschreibung neuer Technologien findet, wie etwa "autonome mobile Roboter" oder "autonome Systeme". Dem Begriff nach rekurriert die "Autonomie" jener Technologien auf eine bestimmte Art technologischen Fortschritts, die von der Fähigkeit zur Selbstgesetzgebung herrührt. Dies wirft aus philosophischer Sicht jedoch die Frage auf, wie die Selbstgesetzgebung in diesem Fall definiert ist, zumal sich der Autonomiebegriff in der Philosophie auf die politische oder moralische Selbstgesetzgebung von Menschen oder Menschengruppen beziehungsweise ihre Handlungen bezieht. Im Handbuch Robotik hingegen führt der Autor geradezu beiläufig die Bezeichnung "autonom" ein, indem er prognostiziert, dass "[.] autonome Roboter in Zukunft sogar einen Großteil der Altenbetreuung übernehmen werden."
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  7. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.21
    0.21124868 = product of:
      0.316873 = sum of:
        0.04458952 = product of:
          0.13376856 = sum of:
            0.13376856 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13376856 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1891773 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1891773 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.016221903 = weight(_text_:information in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016221903 = score(doc=5820,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.06688428 = product of:
          0.13376856 = sum of:
            0.13376856 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13376856 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
    This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  8. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.21
    0.21112776 = product of:
      0.31669164 = sum of:
        0.0557369 = product of:
          0.1672107 = sum of:
            0.1672107 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1672107 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1672107 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1672107 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.01013869 = weight(_text_:information in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01013869 = score(doc=4997,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.08360535 = product of:
          0.1672107 = sum of:
            0.1672107 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1672107 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
    Imprint
    Trento : University / Department of information engineering and computer science
  9. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.15
    0.15327647 = product of:
      0.30655295 = sum of:
        0.0557369 = product of:
          0.1672107 = sum of:
            0.1672107 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1672107 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1672107 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1672107 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.08360535 = product of:
          0.1672107 = sum of:
            0.1672107 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1672107 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  10. Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (2010) 0.12
    0.12319332 = product of:
      0.18478999 = sum of:
        0.032189343 = weight(_text_:information in 3756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032189343 = score(doc=3756,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.4354273 = fieldWeight in 3756, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3756)
        0.027426518 = weight(_text_:und in 3756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027426518 = score(doc=3756,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3756, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3756)
        0.06091749 = product of:
          0.12183498 = sum of:
            0.12183498 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12183498 = score(doc=3756,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.6193392 = fieldWeight in 3756, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3756)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06425664 = product of:
          0.12851328 = sum of:
            0.12851328 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 3756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12851328 = score(doc=3756,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24026412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.5348834 = fieldWeight in 3756, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3756)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    Often invisible to the broader society, the information disciplines determine much of what is available to these societies from their entire heritage of knowledge, culture, and entertainment. Containing the contributions of major researchers and practitioners, this third edition of the "Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences" reflects the growing convergence among the several disciplines that concern themselves with information and the cultural record. This work addresses these related disciplines in a way that demonstrates the unities across the fields and also recognizes their uniquely distinguishing characteristics. It covers a broad spectrum of related information disciplines, including: archival science; bibliography; document and genre theory; informatics; information systems; knowledge management; library and information science; museum studies; records management; and, social studies of information.
    BK
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    LCSH
    Information science / Encyclopedias
    RSWK
    Information und Dokumentation / Bibliothek / Wörterbuch
    Subject
    Information und Dokumentation / Bibliothek / Wörterbuch
    Information science / Encyclopedias
  11. Schwarz, H.: ¬Das Deutsche Bibliotheksinstitut : im Spannungsfeld zwischen Auftrag und politischem Interesse (2017) 0.11
    0.11427482 = product of:
      0.17141223 = sum of:
        0.014194165 = weight(_text_:information in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014194165 = score(doc=3725,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
        0.031997606 = weight(_text_:und in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031997606 = score(doc=3725,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
        0.050254364 = product of:
          0.10050873 = sum of:
            0.10050873 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10050873 = score(doc=3725,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.5109288 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.07496609 = product of:
          0.14993218 = sum of:
            0.14993218 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14993218 = score(doc=3725,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24026412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.62403065 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    Das 1978 gegründete Deutsche Bibliotheksinstitut als zentrale Einrichtung des Deutschen Bibliothekswesens - sein Auf - und Abstieg.
    BK
    06.30 Bibliothekswesen Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines
    06.04 Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen Information und Dokumentation
    Classification
    06.30 Bibliothekswesen Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines
    06.04 Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen Information und Dokumentation
  12. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.11
    0.11318619 = product of:
      0.22637238 = sum of:
        0.20065282 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20065282 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.008602964 = weight(_text_:information in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008602964 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.017116595 = product of:
          0.03423319 = sum of:
            0.03423319 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03423319 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  13. Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft : Hat die Infromationswissenschaft eine Zukunft? Grundlagen und Perspektiven - Angebote in der Lehre - An den Fronten der Informationswissenschaft (2019) 0.11
    0.11219989 = product of:
      0.16829982 = sum of:
        0.012417309 = weight(_text_:information in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012417309 = score(doc=5239,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
        0.044259354 = weight(_text_:und in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044259354 = score(doc=5239,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.47420087 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
        0.035895973 = product of:
          0.07179195 = sum of:
            0.07179195 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07179195 = score(doc=5239,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.36494914 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.07572718 = product of:
          0.15145436 = sum of:
            0.15145436 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15145436 = score(doc=5239,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.24026412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.63036615 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    Befindet sich die Informationswissenschaft in der Krise? Die Krise der Informationswissenschaft ist durch institutionelle Schließungen, mangelhaften Zusammenhalt und geringe Sichtbarkeit in Politik und Öffentlichkeit gekennzeichnet. Führende Informationswissenschaftler diskutieren, ob die Informationswissenschaft ein neues Paradigma braucht. Sie stellen sich der Frage, wie sie ihre Lehre an neue Herausforderungen in der Praxis, beispielsweise die neue Flut an Fehl- und Falschinformationen, anpassen und die Studierenden im Verbund beispielsweise mit wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken noch besser an anspruchsvolle Recherchen und Quellenkritik heranführen sollten. Die Forschung der Informationswissenschaft umfasst ein heterogenes Themenspektrum und kommt zu wichtigen Ergebnissen, z.B. in den Bereichen Smart Cities und Smart Countries, Semantic Web, Information Behavior, Big Data und Forschungsinfrastruktur. Diese und andere Gebiete werden unsere Zukunft bis weit in unseren Alltag hinein bestimmen. Wie wir diese Herausforderungen bewältigen, dafür eröffnet die Informationswissenschaft neue und notwendige Perspektiven.
    BK
    06.00 (Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines)
    06.30 (Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines)
    Classification
    06.00 (Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines)
    06.30 (Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines)
    RSWK
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Informationsgesellschaft / Informationseinrichtung / Zukunft
    Subject
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Informationsgesellschaft / Informationseinrichtung / Zukunft
  14. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.10
    0.101368606 = product of:
      0.30410582 = sum of:
        0.26753712 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26753712 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35702205 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.036568694 = weight(_text_:und in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036568694 = score(doc=2188,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftliche Karrieren und Publikationen benötigen Reputation und möglichst viel Beachtung. Literatur, die diese Aufmerksamkeit findet, wird - so die gängige Annahme - häufig zitiert. Ausgehend von dieser Überlegung wurden Verfahren der Zitationsmessung entwickelt, die Auskunft über die Relevanz oder (wie im- und explizit oft auch postuliert wird) gar die Qualität einer Publikation oder eines Wissenschaftlers geben sollen.
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  15. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.08
    0.08076194 = product of:
      0.12114291 = sum of:
        0.012166427 = weight(_text_:information in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012166427 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.023752064 = weight(_text_:und in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023752064 = score(doc=402,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.06810783 = product of:
          0.13621566 = sum of:
            0.13621566 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13621566 = score(doc=402,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.69244236 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.017116595 = product of:
          0.03423319 = sum of:
            0.03423319 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03423319 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
  16. Ockenfeld, M.: 25. Oberhofer Kolloquium gibt frische Impulse (2010) 0.08
    0.078131124 = product of:
      0.11719669 = sum of:
        0.016030675 = weight(_text_:information in 3931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016030675 = score(doc=3931,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 3931, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3931)
        0.036137614 = weight(_text_:und in 3931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036137614 = score(doc=3931,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.3871834 = fieldWeight in 3931, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3931)
        0.050764572 = product of:
          0.101529144 = sum of:
            0.101529144 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101529144 = score(doc=3931,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.516116 = fieldWeight in 3931, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3931)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014263829 = product of:
          0.028527658 = sum of:
            0.028527658 = weight(_text_:22 in 3931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028527658 = score(doc=3931,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3931, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3931)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    47 Jahre ist es her, dass die Berater des US-amerikanischen Präsidenten Kennedy, in ihrem Bericht "Science, Government and Information" die Empfehlung aussprachen, in jedem Forscherteam gleichberechtigt "research scientists" und "information scientists" zusammen zu spannen, eine Forderung, die heute wieder neu gestellt werden muss. Sowohl die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Dokumentation (DGD) als auch das Zentralinstitut für Information und Dokumentation (ZIID) ließen diesen sogenannten Weinberg Report seinerzeit ins Deutsche übersetzen. Die Dokumentationsbewegung in ganz Deutschland erhielt politischen Rückenwind. Ein Jahr zuvor, am 16. und 17. November 1962, fand auf Initiative des Leiters des Instituts für Dokumentation und Patentwesen der Hochschule für Elektrotechnik, Ilmenau, Prof. Dr. Felix Weber, in Ilmenau ein Kolloquium "Dokumentation/ Information" statt. Diese Veranstaltung bildete den gemeinsame Ursprung von zwei Veranstaltungsreihen, die es bis in die Gegenwart gibt: Das Internationale Kolloquium zur Praxis der Informationsvermittlung, kurz "Oberhofer Kolloquium" sowie das "Kolloquium der TU Ilmenau über Patentinformation und gewerblichen Rechtsschutz", kurz "PATINFO". Das "Oberhofer Kolloquium" mit dem Thema "Recherche im Google-Zeitalter - vollständig und präzise?! Die Notwendigkeit von Informationskompetenz" fand vom 22. bis 24. April zum 25. Mal statt. Etwa hundert ehemalige, aktive und künftige praktisch und wissenschaftlich Tätige aus dem weit gespannten Bereich der Informationsaufbereitung und -vermittlung waren der Einladung nach Barleben bei Magdeburg gefolgt.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.4, S.267-268
  17. Floridi, L.: Information: a very short introduction (2010) 0.08
    0.076912746 = product of:
      0.11536911 = sum of:
        0.030885585 = weight(_text_:information in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030885585 = score(doc=3270,freq=58.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.4177913 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
              7.615773 = tf(freq=58.0), with freq of:
                58.0 = termFreq=58.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
        0.012928985 = weight(_text_:und in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012928985 = score(doc=3270,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.13852294 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
        0.02871678 = product of:
          0.05743356 = sum of:
            0.05743356 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05743356 = score(doc=3270,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.29195932 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.04283776 = product of:
          0.08567552 = sum of:
            0.08567552 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08567552 = score(doc=3270,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24026412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.35658893 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    We live in a society that is awash with information, but few of us really understand what information is. In this Very Short Introduction, one of the world's leading authorities on the philosophy of information and on information ethics, Luciano Floridi, offers an illuminating exploration of information as it relates to both philosophy and science. He discusses the roots of the concept of information in mathematics and science, and considers the role of information in several fields, including biology. Floridi also discusses concepts such as "Infoglut" (too much information to process) and the emergence of an information society, and he addresses the nature of information as a communication process and its place as a physical phenomenon. Perhaps more important, he explores information's meaning and value, and ends by considering the broader social and ethical issues relating to information, including problems surrounding accessibility, privacy, ownership, copyright, and open source. This book helps us understand the true meaning of the concept and how it can be used to understand our world. About the Series: Combining authority with wit, accessibility, and style, Very Short Introductions offer an introduction to some of life's most interesting topics. Written by experts for the newcomer, they demonstrate the finest contemporary thinking about the central problems and issues in hundreds of key topics, from philosophy to Freud, quantum theory to Islam.
    BK
    06.00 (Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines)
    Classification
    06.00 (Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines)
    RSWK
    Information / Soziologie / Einführung
    Information / Philosophie / Informationstheorie / Wissenssoziologie / Einführung
    Philosophie / Information / Bedeutung / Differenz / Daten / Einführung (HBZ)
    Information / Mathematik / Semantik
    Physik / Information / Entropie / Maxwellscher Dämon
    Biologie / Information / Genetik / DNS / Codon / Kommunikation / Neurobiologie
    Information / Wirtschaft
    Subject
    Information / Soziologie / Einführung
    Information / Philosophie / Informationstheorie / Wissenssoziologie / Einführung
    Philosophie / Information / Bedeutung / Differenz / Daten / Einführung (HBZ)
    Information / Mathematik / Semantik
    Physik / Information / Entropie / Maxwellscher Dämon
    Biologie / Information / Genetik / DNS / Codon / Kommunikation / Neurobiologie
    Information / Wirtschaft
    Theme
    Information
  18. Theory development in the information sciences (2016) 0.07
    0.07419897 = product of:
      0.11129845 = sum of:
        0.02145956 = weight(_text_:information in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02145956 = score(doc=3701,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.29028487 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
        0.018284347 = weight(_text_:und in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018284347 = score(doc=3701,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
        0.02871678 = product of:
          0.05743356 = sum of:
            0.05743356 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05743356 = score(doc=3701,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.29195932 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.04283776 = product of:
          0.08567552 = sum of:
            0.08567552 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08567552 = score(doc=3701,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24026412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.35658893 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    Emerging as a discipline in the first half of the twentieth century, the information sciences study how people, groups, organizations, and governments create, share, disseminate, manage, search, access, evaluate, and protect information, as well as how different technologies and policies can facilitate and constrain these activities. Given the broad span of the information sciences, it is perhaps not surprising that there is no consensus regarding its underlying theory the purposes of it, the types of it, or how one goes about developing new theories to talk about new research questions. Diane H. Sonnenwald and the contributors to this volume seek to shed light on these issues by sharing reflections on the theory-development process. These reflections are not meant to revolve around data collection and analysis; rather, they focus on the struggles, challenges, successes, and excitement of developing theories. The particular theories that the contributors explore in their essays range widely, from theories of literacy and reading to theories of design and digital search. Several chapters engage with theories of the behavior of individuals and groups; some deal with processes of evaluation; others reflect on questions of design; and the rest treat cultural and scientific heritage. The ultimate goal, Sonnenwald writes in her introduction, is to "encourage, inspire, and assist individuals striving to develop and/or teach theory development.""
    BK
    6.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    6.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Content
    Inhalt: Exploring Theory Development: Learning from Diverse Masters Behavior of Individuals and Groups Many Paths to Theory: The Creative Process in the Information Sciences Reflections on Theory Construction in Human Information Behavior: A Theory of Browsing Reflections on the Development of a Theoretical Perspective Converging on Theory from Four Sides Evaluation Drawing Graphs for Theory Development in Bibliometrics and Retrieval Two Views on Theory Development for Interactive Information Retrieval Relevance: In Search of a Theoretical Foundation The Story of a Colony: Theory Development in Webometric Research Design Theorizing the Unprecedented Appropriating Theory Theory for Design: The Case of Reading Cultural and Scientific Heritage The Poverty of Theory; or, The Education of Jerome McGann Illuminating Daughter-Mother Narratives in Young Adult Fiction The Noblest Pleasure: Theories of Understanding in the Information Sciences Apologia pro Theoria Sua Supporting Future Theory Development
    LCSH
    Information science
    Information theory
    RSWK
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Theoriebildung / Informationstheorie
    Subject
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Theoriebildung / Informationstheorie
    Information science
    Information theory
  19. Lepsky, K.: Automatische Indexierung (2012) 0.07
    0.07036662 = product of:
      0.14073324 = sum of:
        0.022941235 = weight(_text_:information in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022941235 = score(doc=442,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
        0.036568694 = weight(_text_:und in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036568694 = score(doc=442,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
        0.08122332 = product of:
          0.16244663 = sum of:
            0.16244663 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16244663 = score(doc=442,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.82578564 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 6. Aufl
  20. Vom Buch zur Datenbank : Paul Otlets Utopie der Wissensvisualisierung (2012) 0.06
    0.06174731 = product of:
      0.09262096 = sum of:
        0.01013869 = weight(_text_:information in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01013869 = score(doc=3074,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07392587 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
        0.032322463 = weight(_text_:und in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032322463 = score(doc=3074,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.093334615 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042111535 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
        0.035895973 = product of:
          0.07179195 = sum of:
            0.07179195 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07179195 = score(doc=3074,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19671768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.36494914 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014263829 = product of:
          0.028527658 = sum of:
            0.028527658 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028527658 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14746742 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042111535 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    Gegen Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts geriet das Dokumentationswesen in eine Krise: wie lässt sich das kulturelle Wissen nachhaltiger organisieren? Paul Otlet (1868-1944), ein belgischer Industriellenerbe und studierter Rechtsanwalt, entwickelte zusammen mit Henri La Fontaine ab 1895 ein Ordnungs- und Klassifikationssystem, das das millionenfach publizierte "Weltwissen" dokumentieren sollte. Otlets Anspruch war die Schaffung eines "Instrument d'ubiquité", das zur "Hyper-Intelligence" führen sollte. Jahrzehnte vor Web und Wikis weisen diese Ideen auf eine globale Vernetzung des Wissens hin. Der vorliegende Titel erinnert an den Pionier Paul Otlet mit einer ausführlichen Einleitung von Frank Hartmann (Bauhaus-Universität Weimar), Beiträgen von W. Boyd Rayward (University of Illinois), Charles van den Heuvel (Königlich Niederländische Akademie der Wissenschaften) und Wouter Van Acker (Universität Gent).
    BK
    06.01 Geschichte des Informations- und Dokumentationswesens
    Classification
    06.01 Geschichte des Informations- und Dokumentationswesens
    Date
    22. 8.2016 16:06:54
    RSWK
    Otlet, Paul / Wissensorganisation / Klassifikation / Information und Dokumentation / Geschichte 1895-1944 / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Otlet, Paul / Wissensorganisation / Klassifikation / Information und Dokumentation / Geschichte 1895-1944 / Aufsatzsammlung

Languages

  • e 3600
  • d 1652
  • a 2
  • f 2
  • i 2
  • es 1
  • hu 1
  • m 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 4590
  • el 542
  • m 425
  • s 112
  • x 92
  • r 30
  • n 11
  • b 7
  • i 4
  • p 2
  • v 2
  • ms 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications