Illing, S.: Automatisiertes klinisches Codieren (2021)
0.08
0.07953672 = product of:
0.15907344 = sum of:
0.024160858 = weight(_text_:und in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024160858 = score(doc=419,freq=4.0), product of:
0.087208875 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.039347667 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
0.09339812 = weight(_text_:methoden in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09339812 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20390649 = queryWeight, product of:
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.039347667 = queryNorm
0.45804384 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
0.017353604 = weight(_text_:der in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017353604 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.087893516 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.039347667 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
0.024160858 = weight(_text_:und in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024160858 = score(doc=419,freq=4.0), product of:
0.087208875 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.039347667 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- Die in diesem Artikel vorgestellte Bachelorarbeit behandelt die Ergebnisse einer Shared Task im Bereich eHealth. Es wird untersucht, ob die Klassifikationsgenauigkeit ausgewählter klinischer Codiersysteme durch den Einsatz von Ensemble-Methoden verbessert werden kann. Entscheidend dafür sind die Werte der Evaluationsmaße Mean Average Precision und F1-Maß.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.5/6, S.285-290