Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.02
    0.018107262 = product of:
      0.054321785 = sum of:
        0.03177729 = weight(_text_:der in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03177729 = score(doc=318,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09292302 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04159925 = queryNorm
            0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
        0.022544496 = product of:
          0.04508899 = sum of:
            0.04508899 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04508899 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14567348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04159925 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In der Session "Knowledge Representation" auf der ISI 2021 wurden unter der Moderation von Jürgen Reischer (Uni Regensburg) drei Projekte vorgestellt, in denen Knowledge Representation mit RDF umgesetzt wird. Die Domänen sind erfreulich unterschiedlich, die gemeinsame Klammer indes ist die Absicht, den Zugang zu Forschungsdaten zu verbessern: - Japanese Visual Media Graph - Taxonomy of Digital Research Activities in the Humanities - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  2. Hoppe, T.: Semantische Filterung : ein Werkzeug zur Steigerung der Effizienz im Wissensmanagement (2013) 0.00
    0.004324341 = product of:
      0.025946045 = sum of:
        0.025946045 = weight(_text_:der in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025946045 = score(doc=2245,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09292302 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04159925 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Open journal of knowledge management. 2013, Ausgabe VII = http://www.community-of-knowledge.de/beitrag/semantische-filterung-ein-werkzeug-zur-steigerung-der-effizienz-im-wissensmanagement/
  3. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.00
    0.003287739 = product of:
      0.019726433 = sum of:
        0.019726433 = product of:
          0.039452866 = sum of:
            0.039452866 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039452866 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14567348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04159925 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  4. Hunger, M.; Neubauer, P.: ¬Die vernetzte Welt : Abfragesprachen für Graphendatenbanken (2013) 0.00
    0.003243256 = product of:
      0.019459534 = sum of:
        0.019459534 = weight(_text_:der in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019459534 = score(doc=1101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09292302 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04159925 = queryNorm
            0.20941564 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Graphendatenbanken sind darauf optimiert, stark miteinander vernetzte Informationen effizient zu speichern und greifbar zu machen. Welchen Ansprüchen müssen Abfragesprachen genügen, damit sie für die Arbeit mit diesen Datenbanken geeignet sind? Bei der Aufarbeitung realer Informationen zeigt sich, dass ein hoher, aber unterschätzter Wert in den Beziehungen zwischen Elementen steckt. Seien es Ereignisse aus Geschichte und Politik, Personen in realen und virtuellen sozialen Netzen, Proteine und Gene, Abhängigkeiten in Märkten und Ökonomien oder Rechnernetze, Computer, Software und Anwender - alles ist miteinander verbunden. Der Graph ist ein Datenmodell, das solche Verbindungsgeflechte abbilden kann. Leider lässt sich das Modell mit relationalen und Aggregat-orientierten NoSQL-Datenbanken ab einer gewissen Komplexität jedoch schwer handhaben. Graphendatenbanken sind dagegen darauf optimiert, solche stark miteinander vernetzten Informationen effizient zu speichern und greifbar zu machen. Auch komplexe Fragen lassen sich durch ausgefeilte Abfragen schnell beantworten. Hierbei kommt es auf die geeignete Abfragesprache an.
  5. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.00
    0.002818062 = product of:
      0.016908372 = sum of:
        0.016908372 = product of:
          0.033816744 = sum of:
            0.033816744 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033816744 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14567348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04159925 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  6. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.00
    0.002818062 = product of:
      0.016908372 = sum of:
        0.016908372 = product of:
          0.033816744 = sum of:
            0.033816744 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033816744 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14567348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04159925 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  7. Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008) 0.00
    0.002818062 = product of:
      0.016908372 = sum of:
        0.016908372 = product of:
          0.033816744 = sum of:
            0.033816744 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033816744 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14567348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04159925 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    28.11.2016 12:43:22
  8. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.00
    0.002348385 = product of:
      0.01409031 = sum of:
        0.01409031 = product of:
          0.02818062 = sum of:
            0.02818062 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02818062 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14567348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04159925 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01