Search (1108 results, page 56 of 56)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Neubauer, W.: ¬The Knowledge portal or the vision of easy access to information (2009) 0.00 
    0.0015288854 = product of:
  0.009173312 = sum of:
    0.009173312 = weight(_text_:der in 2812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009173312 = score(doc=2812,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09292302 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04159925 = queryNorm
        0.09871948 = fieldWeight in 2812, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2812)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vortrag, anlässlich der 9. Internationalen Bielefeld-Konferenz 2009, 3. - 5. Februar 2009.
  2. Niggemann, E.: Europeana: connecting cultural heritage (2009) 0.00 
    0.0015288854 = product of:
  0.009173312 = sum of:
    0.009173312 = weight(_text_:der in 2816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009173312 = score(doc=2816,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09292302 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04159925 = queryNorm
        0.09871948 = fieldWeight in 2816, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2816)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vortrag, anlässlich der 9. Internationalen Bielefeld-Konferenz 2009, 3. - 5. Februar 2009.
  3. Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: Introducing the FRBR library reference model (2015) 0.00 
    0.0015288854 = product of:
  0.009173312 = sum of:
    0.009173312 = weight(_text_:der in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009173312 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09292302 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04159925 = queryNorm
        0.09871948 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC 2015 - Cape Town, South Africa in Session 207 - Cataloguing. Vgl. den Kommentar von H. Wiesenmüller [Mail vom 25.06.2015]: "hier etwas höchst Spannendes - eine knappe Darstellung des konsolidierten FR-Modells, auf das wir schon so lange warten, und das im kommenden Jahr in das weltweite Begutachtungsverfahren gehen soll: http://library.ifla.org/1084/. Ich muss das Paper selbst auch erst in Ruhe lesen, sehe aber beim schnellen Durchblättern mit Freude bestätigt, dass die Gruppe-3-Entitäten aus FRBR tatsächlich abgeschafft werden. Die FRSAD-Entität "Thema" (die für alles stehen kann, was Thema eins Werks ist) wird umgetauft in "Res" (von lateinisch "res", Sache) und steht für "any entity in the universe of discourse". Die Entitäten der Gruppe 2 heißen jetzt zusammenfassend "Agent" und teilen sich auf in "Person" und "Group", wobei letzteres Körperschaften und Familien umfasst. Neu eingeführt wird "Time-span". Auf den ersten Blick scheint das jedenfalls alles ganz gut durchdacht zu sein."
  4. Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : On an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017) 0.00 
    0.0015288854 = product of:
  0.009173312 = sum of:
    0.009173312 = weight(_text_:der in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009173312 = score(doc=3859,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09292302 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04159925 = queryNorm
        0.09871948 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Geschichte der Kataloge
  5. Lavoie, B.; Connaway, L.S.; Dempsey, L.: Anatomy of aggregate collections : the example of Google print for libraries (2005) 0.00 
    0.001409031 = product of:
  0.008454186 = sum of:
    0.008454186 = product of:
      0.016908372 = sum of:
        0.016908372 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016908372 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14567348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04159925 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:08:22
  6. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.00 
    0.001409031 = product of:
  0.008454186 = sum of:
    0.008454186 = product of:
      0.016908372 = sum of:
        0.016908372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016908372 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14567348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04159925 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
  7. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.; Walter, A.-K.: Results from a German terminology mapping effort : intra- and interdisciplinary cross-concordances between controlled vocabularies (2007) 0.00 
    0.0013377748 = product of:
  0.008026648 = sum of:
    0.008026648 = weight(_text_:der in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008026648 = score(doc=542,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09292302 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04159925 = queryNorm
        0.08637954 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
  8. Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007) 0.00 
    0.0011466641 = product of:
  0.0068799844 = sum of:
    0.0068799844 = weight(_text_:der in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0068799844 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09292302 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04159925 = queryNorm
        0.07403961 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vgl. dazu auch die Forderungen der Open Knowledge Foundation (OKF), Katalogdaten grundsätzlich zur weiteren Nutzung freizugeben, unter: http://blog.wikimedia.de/2007/12/15/open-knowledge-foundation-fordert-freie-katalogdaten/.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 881
  • e 194
  • a 12
  • el 2
  • m 2
  • nl 1
  • no 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 485
  • i 86
  • m 29
  • x 20
  • r 18
  • b 15
  • n 9
  • s 7
  • l 3
  • p 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications