Gemberling, T.: FRSAD, Semiotics, and FRBR-LRM (2016)
0.00
0.0016189317 = product of:
0.011332521 = sum of:
0.011332521 = weight(_text_:in in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011332521 = score(doc=5118,freq=6.0), product of:
0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.045721713 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Philosophy grapples with the deepest and most difficult questions in human life. In a 2012 article, Jonathan Furner raises questions about the "Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data" (FRSAD) model. Can the FRSAD framers really avoid tackling philosophical questions as they attempt to do-the long-running dispute between nominalists and realists, in particular? This article attempts to flesh out a realist position while showing some implications for the new Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records-Library Reference Model. It is not clear that FRSAD really takes a realist view, as Furner claims, and a position on the nominalist-realist debate is not necessary for information professionals.
