Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0068323426 = product of:
  0.023913197 = sum of:
    0.017370364 = weight(_text_:und in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017370364 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
    0.0065428335 = weight(_text_:in in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065428335 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

In Grenoble wurde um 1971 das Format MONOCLE als französische Adaption des USMARCII aufgestellt. Dieses wurde vom SiBiL-Verbund übernommen. MONOCLE wurde danach auch die Basis für das weiterentwickelte INTERMARC, das seinerseits ein Vorläufer von UNIMARC wurde. Die Ähnlichkeit mit USMARC ist recht stark, es gibt aber eine Reihe von abweichenden Feldern, vor allem sind die Indikatoren sehr unterschiedlich definiert. Immerhin hat die französische Orientierung auf USMARC dann um 1988 dazu geführt, daß die französischen Universitäten und die Bibliothèque Nationale sich zu einem Anschluß an OCLC entschließen konnten

0.006707287 = product of:
  0.046951007 = sum of:
    0.046951007 = weight(_text_:den in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046951007 = score(doc=682,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13104749 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.35827476 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Die Sacherschließung darf nicht im Alleingang vorgenommen werden; sogar innerhalb einer einzigen Institution ist eine Zusammenarbeit unter denjenigen, die Schlagworte festsetzen, unerläßlich. Soll das gewählte Prinzip der Sacherschließung auch auf andere Institutionen ausgedehnt werden, bieten sich verschiedenen Stufen von Zusammenarbeit an. Zusammenarbeit setzt eine klar definierte Struktur voraus; sie kommt zweifellos teurer zu stehen als ein individuelles Vorgehen, doch werden diese Mehrkosten durch die Vorteile für den Benutzer aufgewogen. Dieser kann von nun an Recherchen anstellen, die ohne diese Zusammenarbeit unmöglich wären

Theme

Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK)

0.0061946614 = product of:
  0.04336263 = sum of:
    0.04336263 = product of:
      0.08672526 = sum of:
        0.08672526 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08672526 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16010965 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045721713 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 34(1989) no.1, S.22-47

0.002472959 = product of:
  0.017310712 = sum of:
    0.017310712 = weight(_text_:in in 3517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017310712 = score(doc=3517,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.27833787 = fieldWeight in 3517, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3517)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Account of the preliminary stages in the Bibliothèque National project to produce data from the national bibliography, the Bibliographie de France, on CD-ROM. The pilot disc was produced in collaboration with the British Library, using software developed by Online Computers, and tested out in 60 establishments in 1988. Results of this experiment showed up problems in installation, and user dissatisfaction with the indexing system, formats, headings, and instruction manual. Overall, however, user feedback indicated a good market for CD-ROM, as a complement to other sources of bibliographical data. The 1st full edition, with 380.000 records covering 1975-89, was produced in May 89, and a 2nd edition is scheduled for Oct 89. Discussions are currently in hand to develop European standards for CD-ROM, to be used by all national libraries.

0.0022895155 = product of:
  0.016026607 = sum of:
    0.016026607 = weight(_text_:in in 1548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016026607 = score(doc=1548,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 1548, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1548)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Extracts from the official report of a study investigating the situation in French public libraries, The main reason for this evaluation is th proposed review of the role of the Bibliothèque Nationale, in relation to developing the role of France in the world information market. The results reported here cover the production and diffusion of bibliographic information. The overall picture is of a lack of coordination between products available and user needs, failure to establish standards for formats and for information technology equioment. The concluding recommendations emphaisis the need for coordinating initiatives by the various organisations involved in producing/diffusing bibliographic information, and establishing common standards to allow free exchange between bibliographic networks. Further studies are in hand to establish guidelines for future policies in more specialised library sectors.

0.001869381 = product of:
  0.013085667 = sum of:
    0.013085667 = weight(_text_:in in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013085667 = score(doc=2840,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Until the 1980s, the handling of documentary information in business was usually split up among 4 unrelated independent departments: the library; archives; secretarial services; and reproduction/printing. The introduction of new technology allows the integration of these operations into a single system; comprising subsystems for: production of internal documents; acquisition and storage of external documents; information retrieval; archive creation and maintenance; and circulation of information between departments, based on local computer networks. In reality, not many businesses are making use of technology available to set up such integrated systems because of the lack of common standards for equipment and software, which makes internal and external communication unreliable. This problem may be resolved in the near future, as a result of discussions now in progress at international level.

0.0016023268 = product of:
  0.011216287 = sum of:
    0.011216287 = weight(_text_:in in 2522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011216287 = score(doc=2522,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2522, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2522)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The social sciences documentation centre (CDSH) of the French National Research Centre initiated the publication in 1988 of a psychology periodicals catalogue, Catalogue thématiques des revues de psychologie. Discusses the problems involved in setting up such a catalogue, with specific reference to deciding how a printed source can best complement its parent on-line data base: in this case, CDSH's PSYSIS. The decision to produce the catalogue has been largely precipitated by low uptake of the data base. Considerable attention has been given to delimiting coverage (French and foreign specialist periodicals, multi-disciplinary periodicals); defining descriptors (involving decisions about who the periodical is aimed at); and what information to include under each entry. The main problems, still to be solved, concern lack of adequate software (only a relational data base would be fully satisfactory); and inadequate information about user requirements from hard copy material as opposed to on-line data bases. The results of this preliminary evaluation, albeit tentative, are of considerable relevance to the delopment of strategies for diffusing information on scientific periodicals in general.

0.0011330162 = product of:
  0.007931113 = sum of:
    0.007931113 = weight(_text_:in in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007931113 = score(doc=2532,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The current trend of simplifying user access to documents in public libraries in France has led to strong criticism of the traditional use of decimal classification, and growing popularity for classifying by centres of interest. The notion of locating documents 'where the reader expects to find them' does not bear reasoned analysis: this approach depends on the subjective attitudes of the reader, whose preconceptions are unknown. Public libraries serve readers of all types, and therefore the classification used must be based on general objective criteria. Argues for the retension of traditional encyclopedic classifications (UDC or Dewey), which despite their drawbacks, are based on subject structures known to everyone, and allow for updating to accommodate new concepts. Classification can operate with visual labelling systems, to simplify access: this approach provides ready identification of centres of interest without discarding the real advantages of universality.