-
Gorraiz, J.: "Web of Science" versus "Scopus" oder das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliotheken (2006)
0.06
0.057937134 = product of:
0.14484283 = sum of:
0.10836365 = weight(_text_:naturwissenschaften in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10836365 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2552727 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.42450154 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.03647918 = product of:
0.07295836 = sum of:
0.07295836 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07295836 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2094595 = queryWeight, product of:
5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.34831727 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Bei den nachfolgenden Ausführungen handelt es sich um eine Zusammenstellung von Kommentaren, Vorträgen und Rückmeldungen von Kollegen bzw. Benutzern der Bibliothek sowie meine eigenen Erfahrungen als Vortragender im Universitätslehrgang "Master of Science", in dessen Rahmen ich das Fach "Bibliometrie" unterrichte. Schwerpunkt dieses Beitrages ist eine Zusammenfassung der Diskussion "Web of Science versus Scopus", die den aktuellen Stand der Kontroverse (vor allem an der Universität Wien im naturwissenschaftlichen Sektor) widerspiegelt. Hier ist zu bemerken, dass diese Problematik auch fachspezifisch ist und deswegen an jeder Universität bzw. in jedem Fachgebiet anders zu betrachten ist. Startpunkt meiner Betrachtung ist die allgemein akzeptierte Notwendigkeit des "Journal of Citation Reports (JCR)". Nur in diesem bibliometrischen Verzeichnis sind derzeit die "Impact Factors" zu finden, die als Grundlage jeder akademischen Evaluation dienen. Deswegen ist JCR heutzutage an jeder Universität mit naturwissenschaftlichen Fächern unentbehrlich und das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliothekare lautet nicht wirklich "Web of Science versus Scopus", sondern genaugesagt "Fallbeispiel A: Web of Science &JCR" oder "Fallbeispiel B: Scopus &JCR".
- Field
- Naturwissenschaften
-
Garfield, E.: Citation indexing : its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (1979)
0.03
0.030649869 = product of:
0.15324934 = sum of:
0.15324934 = weight(_text_:naturwissenschaften in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15324934 = score(doc=348,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2552727 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.60033584 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- RSWK
- Naturwissenschaften / Zitierindex (SWB)
- Subject
- Naturwissenschaften / Zitierindex (SWB)
-
Maricic, S.: Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories (1998)
0.03
0.025284851 = product of:
0.12642425 = sum of:
0.12642425 = weight(_text_:naturwissenschaften in 3003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12642425 = score(doc=3003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2552727 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.4952518 = fieldWeight in 3003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3003)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Field
- Naturwissenschaften
-
Pipp, E.: Inhaltlicher Vergleich von Web of Science und Scopus an Hand der erfassten Zeitschriften (2006)
0.03
0.025284851 = product of:
0.12642425 = sum of:
0.12642425 = weight(_text_:naturwissenschaften in 5940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12642425 = score(doc=5940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2552727 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.4952518 = fieldWeight in 5940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5940)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Field
- Naturwissenschaften
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.008641643 = product of:
0.043208215 = sum of:
0.043208215 = product of:
0.08641643 = sum of:
0.08641643 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08641643 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.01
0.008641643 = product of:
0.043208215 = sum of:
0.043208215 = product of:
0.08641643 = sum of:
0.08641643 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08641643 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.007638206 = product of:
0.038191028 = sum of:
0.038191028 = product of:
0.076382056 = sum of:
0.076382056 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076382056 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.01
0.0054010274 = product of:
0.027005136 = sum of:
0.027005136 = product of:
0.054010272 = sum of:
0.054010272 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054010272 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.00
0.004582924 = product of:
0.022914618 = sum of:
0.022914618 = product of:
0.045829237 = sum of:
0.045829237 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045829237 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.00
0.0043208217 = product of:
0.021604108 = sum of:
0.021604108 = product of:
0.043208215 = sum of:
0.043208215 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043208215 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.00
0.003780719 = product of:
0.018903594 = sum of:
0.018903594 = product of:
0.03780719 = sum of:
0.03780719 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03780719 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.00
0.003780719 = product of:
0.018903594 = sum of:
0.018903594 = product of:
0.03780719 = sum of:
0.03780719 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03780719 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.00
0.003780719 = product of:
0.018903594 = sum of:
0.018903594 = product of:
0.03780719 = sum of:
0.03780719 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03780719 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.00
0.0032406163 = product of:
0.016203081 = sum of:
0.016203081 = product of:
0.032406162 = sum of:
0.032406162 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032406162 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.00
0.0032406163 = product of:
0.016203081 = sum of:
0.016203081 = product of:
0.032406162 = sum of:
0.032406162 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032406162 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.00
0.0032406163 = product of:
0.016203081 = sum of:
0.016203081 = product of:
0.032406162 = sum of:
0.032406162 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032406162 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.00
0.0032406163 = product of:
0.016203081 = sum of:
0.016203081 = product of:
0.032406162 = sum of:
0.032406162 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032406162 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.00
0.0032406163 = product of:
0.016203081 = sum of:
0.016203081 = product of:
0.032406162 = sum of:
0.032406162 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032406162 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.00
0.0032406163 = product of:
0.016203081 = sum of:
0.016203081 = product of:
0.032406162 = sum of:
0.032406162 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032406162 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.00
0.0032406163 = product of:
0.016203081 = sum of:
0.016203081 = product of:
0.032406162 = sum of:
0.032406162 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032406162 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03986404 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
