Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998) 0.03
    0.028896973 = product of:
      0.14448486 = sum of:
        0.14448486 = weight(_text_:naturwissenschaften in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14448486 = score(doc=2999,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2552727 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03986404 = queryNorm
            0.5660021 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Field
    Naturwissenschaften
  2. Ruda, S.: Abstracting: eine Auswahlbibliographie (1992) 0.01
    0.00851181 = product of:
      0.042559046 = sum of:
        0.042559046 = product of:
          0.08511809 = sum of:
            0.08511809 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08511809 = score(doc=6603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2094595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03986404 = queryNorm
                0.40637016 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die vorliegende Auswahlbibliographie ist in 9 Themenbereiche unterteilt. Der erste Abschnitt enthält Literatur, in der auf Abstracts und Abstracting-Verfahren allgemein eingegangen und ein Überblick über den Stand der Forschung gegeben wird. Im nächsten Abschnitt werden solche Aufsätze referiert, die die historische Entwicklung des Abstracting beschreiben. Im dritten Teil sind Abstracting-Richtlinien verschiedener Institutionen aufgelistet. Lexikalische, syntaktische und semantische Textkondensierungsverfahren sind das Thema der in Abschnitt 4 präsentierten Arbeiten. Textstrukturen von Abstracts werden unter Punkt 5 betrachtet, und die Arbeiten des nächsten Themenbereiches befassen sich mit dem Problem des Schreibens von Abstracts. Der siebte Abschnitt listet sog. 'maschinelle' und maschinen-unterstützte Abstracting-Methoden auf. Anschließend werden 'maschinelle' und maschinenunterstützte Abstracting-Verfahren, Abstracts im Vergleich zu ihren Primärtexten sowie Abstracts im allgemeien bewertet. Den Abschluß bilden Bibliographien
  3. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.01
    0.0054010274 = product of:
      0.027005136 = sum of:
        0.027005136 = product of:
          0.054010272 = sum of:
            0.054010272 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054010272 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03986404 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  4. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.00
    0.0043208217 = product of:
      0.021604108 = sum of:
        0.021604108 = product of:
          0.043208215 = sum of:
            0.043208215 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043208215 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03986404 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  5. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    0.0032406163 = product of:
      0.016203081 = sum of:
        0.016203081 = product of:
          0.032406162 = sum of:
            0.032406162 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032406162 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03986404 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  6. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.00
    0.0032406163 = product of:
      0.016203081 = sum of:
        0.016203081 = product of:
          0.032406162 = sum of:
            0.032406162 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032406162 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03986404 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  7. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.00
    0.0032406163 = product of:
      0.016203081 = sum of:
        0.016203081 = product of:
          0.032406162 = sum of:
            0.032406162 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032406162 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03986404 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  8. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00
    0.0027005137 = product of:
      0.013502568 = sum of:
        0.013502568 = product of:
          0.027005136 = sum of:
            0.027005136 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027005136 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13959707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03986404 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356