Daniel, H.-D.: Guardians of science : fairness and reliabiblity of peer review (1993)
0.05
0.047438618 = product of:
0.18975447 = sum of:
0.18975447 = weight(_text_:angewandte in 1713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18975447 = score(doc=1713,freq=8.0), product of:
0.3084216 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.044309065 = queryNorm
0.61524373 = fieldWeight in 1713, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1713)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The book evaluates the peer reviews presented to the Editorial Office of the journal Angewandte Chemie for all contributions submitted for publication in 1984. The peer review system, since its inception in the 17th century, helps to improve the quality of published papers. The book has 10 chapters, dealing with the peer review as an instrument for the self-regulation of science, as a target for criticism, it deals with the journal Angewandte Chemie, the communications received in 1984, the internal and external evaluations and editorial decisions, the reviewers and the reviews, the reliability of manuscript refereeing, the fairness in manuscript evaluation, the validity of manuscript review and makes suggestions for a reform of the peer-review process
- RSWK
- Angewandte Chemie <Zeitschrift> / Zeitschriftenaufsatz / Qualität / Gutachten
- Subject
- Angewandte Chemie <Zeitschrift> / Zeitschriftenaufsatz / Qualität / Gutachten
