Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.09 
    0.0852002 = product of:
  0.3408008 = sum of:
    0.3408008 = sum of:
      0.24474853 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24474853 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044309065 = queryNorm
          0.9881577 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.09605227 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09605227 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044309065 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
    Field
    Mathematik
  2. Garfield, E.: Citation indexing : its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (1979) 0.05 
    0.05031625 = product of:
  0.201265 = sum of:
    0.201265 = weight(_text_:angewandte in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.201265 = score(doc=348,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3084216 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044309065 = queryNorm
        0.6525645 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    BK
    54.80 Angewandte Informatik
    Classification
    54.80 Angewandte Informatik
  3. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008) 0.03 
    0.033544168 = product of:
  0.13417667 = sum of:
    0.13417667 = weight(_text_:angewandte in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13417667 = score(doc=2381,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3084216 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044309065 = queryNorm
        0.43504304 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    All journals that use peer review have to deal with the following question: Does the peer review system fulfill its declared objective to select the best scientific work? We investigated the journal peer-review process at Angewandte Chemie International Edition (AC-IE), one of the prime chemistry journals worldwide, and conducted a citation analysis for Communications that were accepted by the journal (n = 878) or rejected but published elsewhere (n = 959). The results of negative binomial-regression models show that holding all other model variables constant, being accepted by AC-IE increases the expected number of citations by up to 50%. A comparison of average citation counts (with 95% confidence intervals) of accepted and rejected (but published elsewhere) Communications with international scientific reference standards was undertaken. As reference standards, (a) mean citation counts for the journal set provided by Thomson Reuters corresponding to the field chemistry and (b) specific reference standards that refer to the subject areas of Chemical Abstracts were used. When compared to reference standards, the mean impact on chemical research is for the most part far above average not only for accepted Communications but also for rejected (but published elsewhere) Communications. However, average and below-average scientific impact is to be expected significantly less frequently for accepted Communications than for rejected Communications. All in all, the results of this study confirm that peer review at AC-IE is able to select the best scientific work with the highest impact on chemical research.
  4. Göbel, S.: Aspekte der Mathematikliteratur : Untersuchungen in verschiedenen Datenbanken (1997) 0.02 
    0.015296783 = product of:
  0.061187133 = sum of:
    0.061187133 = product of:
      0.12237427 = sum of:
        0.12237427 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12237427 = score(doc=2166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.49407884 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Field
    Mathematik
  5. Braun, T.; Glanzel, W.; Grupp, H.: ¬The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 scientific areas, 1989-1993 : Pt.1: All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics (1995) 0.01 
    0.013384686 = product of:
  0.053538743 = sum of:
    0.053538743 = product of:
      0.10707749 = sum of:
        0.10707749 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10707749 = score(doc=761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.432319 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Field
    Mathematik
  6. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.012006533 = product of:
  0.048026133 = sum of:
    0.048026133 = product of:
      0.09605227 = sum of:
        0.09605227 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09605227 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  7. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01 
    0.010612376 = product of:
  0.042449504 = sum of:
    0.042449504 = product of:
      0.08489901 = sum of:
        0.08489901 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08489901 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  8. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.01 
    0.007504083 = product of:
  0.030016333 = sum of:
    0.030016333 = product of:
      0.060032666 = sum of:
        0.060032666 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060032666 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  9. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.0063674264 = product of:
  0.025469705 = sum of:
    0.025469705 = product of:
      0.05093941 = sum of:
        0.05093941 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05093941 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  10. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01 
    0.0060032667 = product of:
  0.024013067 = sum of:
    0.024013067 = product of:
      0.048026133 = sum of:
        0.048026133 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048026133 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  11. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01 
    0.005252858 = product of:
  0.021011433 = sum of:
    0.021011433 = product of:
      0.042022865 = sum of:
        0.042022865 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042022865 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  12. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01 
    0.005252858 = product of:
  0.021011433 = sum of:
    0.021011433 = product of:
      0.042022865 = sum of:
        0.042022865 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042022865 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  13. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01 
    0.005252858 = product of:
  0.021011433 = sum of:
    0.021011433 = product of:
      0.042022865 = sum of:
        0.042022865 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042022865 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  14. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.00 
    0.0045024497 = product of:
  0.018009799 = sum of:
    0.018009799 = product of:
      0.036019597 = sum of:
        0.036019597 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036019597 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  15. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.00 
    0.0045024497 = product of:
  0.018009799 = sum of:
    0.018009799 = product of:
      0.036019597 = sum of:
        0.036019597 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036019597 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
  16. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.00 
    0.0045024497 = product of:
  0.018009799 = sum of:
    0.018009799 = product of:
      0.036019597 = sum of:
        0.036019597 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036019597 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
  17. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.00 
    0.0045024497 = product of:
  0.018009799 = sum of:
    0.018009799 = product of:
      0.036019597 = sum of:
        0.036019597 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036019597 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  18. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.00 
    0.0045024497 = product of:
  0.018009799 = sum of:
    0.018009799 = product of:
      0.036019597 = sum of:
        0.036019597 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036019597 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  19. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.00 
    0.0045024497 = product of:
  0.018009799 = sum of:
    0.018009799 = product of:
      0.036019597 = sum of:
        0.036019597 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036019597 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  20. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.00 
    0.0045024497 = product of:
  0.018009799 = sum of:
    0.018009799 = product of:
      0.036019597 = sum of:
        0.036019597 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036019597 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 18
  • d 6

Types

  • a 23
  • el 3
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications