Search (135 results, page 1 of 7)

0.07037454 = product of:
  0.28149816 = sum of:
    0.28149816 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28149816 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37565273 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044309065 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.

0.047438618 = product of:
  0.18975447 = sum of:
    0.18975447 = weight(_text_:angewandte in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18975447 = score(doc=2707,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.3084216 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044309065 = queryNorm
        0.61524373 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) published by Thomson Reuters is often used to evaluate the significance and performance of scientific journals. Besides methodological problems with the JIF, the critical issue is whether a single measure is sufficient for characterizing the impact of journals, particularly the impact of multidisciplinary and wide-scope journals that publish articles in a broad range of research fields. Taking Angewandte Chemie International Edition and the Journal of the American Chemical Society as examples, we examined the two journals' publication and impact profiles across the sections of Chemical Abstracts and compared the results with the JIF. The analysis was based primarily on Communications published in Angewandte Chemie International Edition and the Journal of the American Chemical Society during 2001 to 2005. The findings show that the information available in the Science Citation Index is a rather unreliable indication of the document type and is therefore inappropriate for comparative analysis. The findings further suggest that the composition of the journal in terms of contribution types, the length of the citation window, and the thematic focus of the journal in terms of the sections of Chemical Abstracts has a significant influence on the overall journal citation impact. Therefore, a single measure of journal citation impact such as the JIF is insufficient for characterizing the significance and performance of wide-scope journals. For the comparison of journals, more sophisticated methods such as publication and impact profiles across subject headings of bibliographic databases (e.g., the sections of Chemical Abstracts) are valuable.

Object

Angewandte Chemie

0.041930214 = product of:
  0.16772085 = sum of:
    0.16772085 = weight(_text_:angewandte in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16772085 = score(doc=3792,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3084216 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044309065 = queryNorm
        0.5438038 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Scientific journals publish an increasing number of articles every year. To steer readers' attention to the most important papers, journals use several techniques (e.g., lead paper). Angewandte Chemie International Edition (AC), a leading international journal in chemistry, signals high-quality papers through designating them as a "very important paper" (VIP). This study aims to investigate the citation impact of Communications in AC receiving the special feature VIP, both cumulated and over time. Using propensity score matching, treatment group (VIP) and control group (non-VIP) were balanced for 14 covariates to estimate the unconfounded "average treatment effect on the treated" for the VIP designation. Out of N = 3,011 Communications published in 2007 and 2008, N = 207 received the special feature VIP. For each Communication, data were collected from AC (e.g., referees' ratings) and from the databases Chemical Abstracts (e.g., sections) and the Web of Science (e.g., citations). The estimated unconfounded average treatment effect on the treated (that is, Communications designated as a VIP) was statistically significant and amounted to 19.83 citations. In addition, the special feature VIP fostered the cumulated annual citation growth. For instance, the time until a Communication reached its maximum annual number of citations, was reduced.

0.033544168 = product of:
  0.13417667 = sum of:
    0.13417667 = weight(_text_:angewandte in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13417667 = score(doc=2381,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3084216 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044309065 = queryNorm
        0.43504304 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

All journals that use peer review have to deal with the following question: Does the peer review system fulfill its declared objective to select the best scientific work? We investigated the journal peer-review process at Angewandte Chemie International Edition (AC-IE), one of the prime chemistry journals worldwide, and conducted a citation analysis for Communications that were accepted by the journal (n = 878) or rejected but published elsewhere (n = 959). The results of negative binomial-regression models show that holding all other model variables constant, being accepted by AC-IE increases the expected number of citations by up to 50%. A comparison of average citation counts (with 95% confidence intervals) of accepted and rejected (but published elsewhere) Communications with international scientific reference standards was undertaken. As reference standards, (a) mean citation counts for the journal set provided by Thomson Reuters corresponding to the field chemistry and (b) specific reference standards that refer to the subject areas of Chemical Abstracts were used. When compared to reference standards, the mean impact on chemical research is for the most part far above average not only for accepted Communications but also for rejected (but published elsewhere) Communications. However, average and below-average scientific impact is to be expected significantly less frequently for accepted Communications than for rejected Communications. All in all, the results of this study confirm that peer review at AC-IE is able to select the best scientific work with the highest impact on chemical research.

0.029649135 = product of:
  0.11859654 = sum of:
    0.11859654 = weight(_text_:angewandte in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11859654 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3084216 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044309065 = queryNorm
        0.38452733 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In a recently published PNAS paper, Radicchi, Fortunato, and Castellano (2008) propose the relative indicator cf as an unbiased indicator for citation performance across disciplines (fields, subject areas). To calculate cf, the citation rate for a single paper is divided by the average number of citations for all papers in the discipline in which the single paper has been categorized. cf values are said to lead to a universality of discipline-specific citation distributions. Using a comprehensive dataset of an evaluation study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition (AC-IE), we tested the advantage of using this indicator in practical application at the micro level, as compared with (1) simple citation rates, and (2) z-scores, which have been used in psychological testing for many years for normalization of test scores. To calculate z-scores, the mean number of citations of the papers within a discipline is subtracted from the citation rate of a single paper, and the difference is then divided by the citations' standard deviation for a discipline. Our results indicate that z-scores are better suited than cf values to produce universality of discipline-specific citation distributions.

0.026625061 = product of:
  0.106500246 = sum of:
    0.106500246 = sum of:
      0.07648391 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07648391 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044309065 = queryNorm
          0.30879927 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
      0.030016333 = weight(_text_:22 in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030016333 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044309065 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 3.2013 19:23:35

Field

Mathematik

0.019120978 = product of:
  0.07648391 = sum of:
    0.07648391 = product of:
      0.15296783 = sum of:
        0.15296783 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15296783 = score(doc=4499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.61759853 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Field

Mathematik

0.015296783 = product of:
  0.061187133 = sum of:
    0.061187133 = product of:
      0.12237427 = sum of:
        0.12237427 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 7225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12237427 = score(doc=7225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.49407884 = fieldWeight in 7225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7225)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Field

Mathematik

0.015296783 = product of:
  0.061187133 = sum of:
    0.061187133 = product of:
      0.12237427 = sum of:
        0.12237427 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12237427 = score(doc=2166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.49407884 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Field

Mathematik

0.013384686 = product of:
  0.053538743 = sum of:
    0.053538743 = product of:
      0.10707749 = sum of:
        0.10707749 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10707749 = score(doc=761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.432319 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Field

Mathematik

0.013384686 = product of:
  0.053538743 = sum of:
    0.053538743 = product of:
      0.10707749 = sum of:
        0.10707749 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10707749 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.432319 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Field

Mathematik

0.013384686 = product of:
  0.053538743 = sum of:
    0.053538743 = product of:
      0.10707749 = sum of:
        0.10707749 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 5738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10707749 = score(doc=5738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.432319 = fieldWeight in 5738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5738)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Bibliometrische Daten werden heute zunehmend in der Evaluation von Forschungsergebnissen benutzt. Diese Anwendungen reichen von der (indirekten) Verwendung bei der Peer-Evaluation von Drittmittelanträgen über die Beurteilung von Bewerbungen in Berufungskommissionen oder Anträgen für Forschungszulagen bis hin zur systematischen Erhebung von forschungsorientierten Kennzahlen von Institutionen. Mit diesem Dokument will die DMV ihren Mitgliedern eine Diskussionsgrundlage zur Verwendung bibliometrischer Daten im Zusammenhang mit der Evaluation von Personen und Institutionen im Fachgebiet Mathematik zur Verfügung stellen, insbesondere auch im Vergleich zu anderen Fächern. Am Ende des Texts befindet sich ein Glossar, in dem die wichtigsten Begriffe kurz erläutert werden.

0.012006533 = product of:
  0.048026133 = sum of:
    0.048026133 = product of:
      0.09605227 = sum of:
        0.09605227 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09605227 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419

0.012006533 = product of:
  0.048026133 = sum of:
    0.048026133 = product of:
      0.09605227 = sum of:
        0.09605227 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09605227 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

13. 7.2008 19:53:22

0.012006533 = product of:
  0.048026133 = sum of:
    0.048026133 = product of:
      0.09605227 = sum of:
        0.09605227 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09605227 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22

0.0114725875 = product of:
  0.04589035 = sum of:
    0.04589035 = product of:
      0.0917807 = sum of:
        0.0917807 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 4210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0917807 = score(doc=4210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.37055913 = fieldWeight in 4210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4210)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Field

Mathematik

0.0114725875 = product of:
  0.04589035 = sum of:
    0.04589035 = product of:
      0.0917807 = sum of:
        0.0917807 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0917807 = score(doc=4994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24768166 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.37055913 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Field

Mathematik

0.010612376 = product of:
  0.042449504 = sum of:
    0.042449504 = product of:
      0.08489901 = sum of:
        0.08489901 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08489901 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 5.1999 19:22:35

0.010612376 = product of:
  0.042449504 = sum of:
    0.042449504 = product of:
      0.08489901 = sum of:
        0.08489901 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08489901 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2006 15:22:28

0.010505716 = product of:
  0.042022865 = sum of:
    0.042022865 = product of:
      0.08404573 = sum of:
        0.08404573 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08404573 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1551628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044309065 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)