-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.18
0.18370643 = product of:
0.24494192 = sum of:
0.05873049 = product of:
0.17619146 = sum of:
0.17619146 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17619146 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17619146 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17619146 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.12
0.11746098 = product of:
0.23492196 = sum of:
0.05873049 = product of:
0.17619146 = sum of:
0.17619146 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17619146 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17619146 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17619146 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.09
0.09310571 = product of:
0.18621142 = sum of:
0.17619146 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17619146 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
-
Thelwall, M.; Price, L.: Language evolution and the spread of ideas on the Web : a procedure for identifying emergent hybrid word (2006)
0.02
0.024313705 = product of:
0.09725482 = sum of:
0.09725482 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09725482 = score(doc=5896,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.49655905 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Word usage is of interest to linguists for its own sake as well as to social scientists and others who seek to track the spread of ideas, for example, in public debates over political decisions. The historical evolution of language can be analyzed with the tools of corpus linguistics through evolving corpora and the Web. But word usage statistics can only be gathered for known words. In this article, techniques are described and tested for identifying new words from the Web, focusing on the case when the words are related to a topic and have a hybrid form with a common sequence of letters. The results highlight the need to employ a combination of search techniques and show the wide potential of hybrid word family investigations in linguistics and social science.
-
Deventer, J.P. van; Kruger, C.J.; Johnson, R.D.: Delineating knowledge management through lexical analysis : a retrospective (2015)
0.02
0.022980269 = product of:
0.045960538 = sum of:
0.040115565 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040115565 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.20482016 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.0058449726 = product of:
0.017534917 = sum of:
0.017534917 = weight(_text_:22 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017534917 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Research limitations/implications In total, 42 definitions were identified spanning a period of 11 years. This represented the first use of KM through the estimated apex of terms used. From 2006 onwards definitions were used in repetition, and all definitions that were considered to repeat were therefore subsequently excluded as not being unique instances. All definitions listed are by no means complete and exhaustive. The definitions are viewed outside the scope and context in which they were originally formulated and then used to review the key concepts in the definitions themselves. Social implications When the authors refer to the aforementioned discussion of KM content as well as the presentation of the method followed in this paper, the authors may have a few implications for future research in KM. First the research validates ideas presented by the OECD in 2005 pertaining to KM. It also validates that through the evolution of KM, the authors ended with a description of KM that may be seen as a standardised description. If the authors as academics and practitioners, for example, refer to KM as the same construct and/or idea, it has the potential to speculatively, distinguish between what KM may or may not be. Originality/value By simplifying the term used to define KM, by focusing on the most common definitions, the paper assist in refocusing KM by reconsidering the dimensions that is the most common in how it has been defined over time. This would hopefully assist in reigniting discussions about KM and how it may be used to the benefit of an organisation.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Robertson, A.M.; Willett, P.: Generation of equifrequent groups of words using a genetic algorithm (1994)
0.02
0.020057783 = product of:
0.08023113 = sum of:
0.08023113 = weight(_text_:evolution in 8158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08023113 = score(doc=8158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 8158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8158)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Genetic algorithms are a class of non-deterministic algorithms that derive from Darwinian evolution and that provide good, though not necessarily optimal, solutions to combinatorial problems. We describe their application to the identification of characteristics that occur approximately equifrequently in a database, using two different methods for the creation of the chromosome data structures that lie at the heart of a genetic algortihm. Experiments with files of English and Turkish text suggest that the genetic algorithm developed here can produce results superior to those produced by existing non-deterministic algorithms; however, the results are inferior to those produced by an existing deterministic algorithm
-
Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.; SanJuan, E.: From term variants to research topics (2002)
0.01
0.014326988 = product of:
0.05730795 = sum of:
0.05730795 = weight(_text_:evolution in 1853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05730795 = score(doc=1853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 1853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1853)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In a scientific and technological watch (STW) task, an expert user needs to survey the evolution of research topics in his area of specialisation in order to detect interesting changes. The majority of methods proposing evaluation metrics (bibliometrics and scientometrics studies) for STW rely solely an statistical data analysis methods (Co-citation analysis, co-word analysis). Such methods usually work an structured databases where the units of analysis (words, keywords) are already attributed to documents by human indexers. The advent of huge amounts of unstructured textual data has rendered necessary the integration of natural language processing (NLP) techniques to first extract meaningful units from texts. We propose a method for STW which is NLP-oriented. The method not only analyses texts linguistically in order to extract terms from them, but also uses linguistic relations (syntactic variations) as the basis for clustering. Terms and variation relations are formalised as weighted di-graphs which the clustering algorithm, CPCL (Classification by Preferential Clustered Link) will seek to reduce in order to produces classes. These classes ideally represent the research topics present in the corpus. The results of the classification are subjected to validation by an expert in STW.
-
Savoy, J.: Text representation strategies : an example with the State of the union addresses (2016)
0.01
0.014326988 = product of:
0.05730795 = sum of:
0.05730795 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05730795 = score(doc=3042,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 3042, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3042)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Based on State of the Union addresses from 1790 to 2014 (225 speeches delivered by 42 presidents), this paper describes and evaluates different text representation strategies. To determine the most important words of a given text, the term frequencies (tf) or the tf?idf weighting scheme can be applied. Recently, latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) has been proposed to define the topics included in a corpus. As another strategy, this study proposes to apply a vocabulary specificity measure (Z?score) to determine the most significantly overused word-types or short sequences of them. Our experiments show that the simple term frequency measure is not able to discriminate between specific terms associated with a document or a set of texts. Using the tf idf or LDA approach, the selection requires some arbitrary decisions. Based on the term-specific measure (Z?score), the term selection has a clear theoretical basis. Moreover, the most significant sentences for each presidency can be determined. As another facet, we can visualize the dynamic evolution of usage of some terms associated with their specificity measures. Finally, this technique can be employed to define the most important lexical leaders introducing terms overused by the k following presidencies.
-
Soni, S.; Lerman, K.; Eisenstein, J.: Follow the leader : documents on the leading edge of semantic change get more citations (2021)
0.01
0.014326988 = product of:
0.05730795 = sum of:
0.05730795 = weight(_text_:evolution in 169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05730795 = score(doc=169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=169)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Diachronic word embeddings-vector representations of words over time-offer remarkable insights into the evolution of language and provide a tool for quantifying sociocultural change from text documents. Prior work has used such embeddings to identify shifts in the meaning of individual words. However, simply knowing that a word has changed in meaning is insufficient to identify the instances of word usage that convey the historical meaning or the newer meaning. In this study, we link diachronic word embeddings to documents, by situating those documents as leaders or laggards with respect to ongoing semantic changes. Specifically, we propose a novel method to quantify the degree of semantic progressiveness in each word usage, and then show how these usages can be aggregated to obtain scores for each document. We analyze two large collections of documents, representing legal opinions and scientific articles. Documents that are scored as semantically progressive receive a larger number of citations, indicating that they are especially influential. Our work thus provides a new technique for identifying lexical semantic leaders and demonstrates a new link between progressive use of language and influence in a citation network.
-
Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.01
0.008596192 = product of:
0.03438477 = sum of:
0.03438477 = weight(_text_:evolution in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03438477 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.17556013 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Concepts and Language: The Role of Conceptual Structure in Human Evolution (Keith Devlin) - Concepts in Linguistics - Concepts in Natural Language (Gisela Harras) - Patterns, Schemata, and Types: Author Support through Formalized Experience (Felix H. Gatzemeier) - Conventions and Notations for Knowledge Representation and Retrieval (Philippe Martin) - Conceptual Ontology: Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics (John F. Sowa) - Pragmatically Yours (Mary Keeler) - Conceptual Modeling for Distributed Ontology Environments (Deborah L. McGuinness) - Discovery of Class Relations in Exception Structured Knowledge Bases (Hendra Suryanto, Paul Compton) - Conceptual Graphs: Perspectives: CGs Applications: Where Are We 7 Years after the First ICCS ? (Michel Chein, David Genest) - The Engineering of a CC-Based System: Fundamental Issues (Guy W. Mineau) - Conceptual Graphs, Metamodeling, and Notation of Concepts (Olivier Gerbé, Guy W. Mineau, Rudolf K. Keller) - Knowledge Representation and Reasonings: Based on Graph Homomorphism (Marie-Laure Mugnier) - User Modeling Using Conceptual Graphs for Intelligent Agents (James F. Baldwin, Trevor P. Martin, Aimilia Tzanavari) - Towards a Unified Querying System of Both Structured and Semi-structured Imprecise Data Using Fuzzy View (Patrice Buche, Ollivier Haemmerlé) - Formal Semantics of Conceptual Structures: The Extensional Semantics of the Conceptual Graph Formalism (Guy W. Mineau) - Semantics of Attribute Relations in Conceptual Graphs (Pavel Kocura) - Nested Concept Graphs and Triadic Power Context Families (Susanne Prediger) - Negations in Simple Concept Graphs (Frithjof Dau) - Extending the CG Model by Simulations (Jean-François Baget) - Contextual Logic and Formal Concept Analysis: Building and Structuring Description Logic Knowledge Bases: Using Least Common Subsumers and Concept Analysis (Franz Baader, Ralf Molitor) - On the Contextual Logic of Ordinal Data (Silke Pollandt, Rudolf Wille) - Boolean Concept Logic (Rudolf Wille) - Lattices of Triadic Concept Graphs (Bernd Groh, Rudolf Wille) - Formalizing Hypotheses with Concepts (Bernhard Ganter, Sergei 0. Kuznetsov) - Generalized Formal Concept Analysis (Laurent Chaudron, Nicolas Maille) - A Logical Generalization of Formal Concept Analysis (Sébastien Ferré, Olivier Ridoux) - On the Treatment of Incomplete Knowledge in Formal Concept Analysis (Peter Burmeister, Richard Holzer) - Conceptual Structures in Practice: Logic-Based Networks: Concept Graphs and Conceptual Structures (Peter W. Eklund) - Conceptual Knowledge Discovery and Data Analysis (Joachim Hereth, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille, Uta Wille) - CEM - A Conceptual Email Manager (Richard Cole, Gerd Stumme) - A Contextual-Logic Extension of TOSCANA (Peter Eklund, Bernd Groh, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille) - A Conceptual Graph Model for W3C Resource Description Framework (Olivier Corby, Rose Dieng, Cédric Hébert) - Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures: Computing with Conceptual Structures (Bernhard Ganter) - Symmetry and the Computation of Conceptual Structures (Robert Levinson) An Introduction to SNePS 3 (Stuart C. Shapiro) - Composition Norm Dynamics Calculation with Conceptual Graphs (Aldo de Moor) - From PROLOG++ to PROLOG+CG: A CG Object-Oriented Logic Programming Language (Adil Kabbaj, Martin Janta-Polczynski) - A Cost-Bounded Algorithm to Control Events Generalization (Gaël de Chalendar, Brigitte Grau, Olivier Ferret)
-
Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987)
0.01
0.0066799684 = product of:
0.026719874 = sum of:
0.026719874 = product of:
0.08015962 = sum of:
0.08015962 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08015962 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
-
McMahon, J.G.; Smith, F.J.: Improved statistical language model performance with automatic generated word hierarchies (1996)
0.01
0.0058449726 = product of:
0.02337989 = sum of:
0.02337989 = product of:
0.07013967 = sum of:
0.07013967 = weight(_text_:22 in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07013967 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.217-248
-
Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991)
0.01
0.0058449726 = product of:
0.02337989 = sum of:
0.02337989 = product of:
0.07013967 = sum of:
0.07013967 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07013967 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 11:52:22
-
Somers, H.: Example-based machine translation : Review article (1999)
0.01
0.0058449726 = product of:
0.02337989 = sum of:
0.02337989 = product of:
0.07013967 = sum of:
0.07013967 = weight(_text_:22 in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07013967 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
New tools for human translators (1997)
0.01
0.0058449726 = product of:
0.02337989 = sum of:
0.02337989 = product of:
0.07013967 = sum of:
0.07013967 = weight(_text_:22 in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07013967 = score(doc=1179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997)
0.01
0.0058449726 = product of:
0.02337989 = sum of:
0.02337989 = product of:
0.07013967 = sum of:
0.07013967 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07013967 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 2.1999 10:48:22
-
¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023)
0.01
0.0058449726 = product of:
0.02337989 = sum of:
0.02337989 = product of:
0.07013967 = sum of:
0.07013967 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07013967 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27. 1.2023 16:22:55
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.01
0.005009976 = product of:
0.020039905 = sum of:
0.020039905 = product of:
0.060119715 = sum of:
0.060119715 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060119715 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
-
Boleda, G.; Evert, S.: Multiword expressions : a pain in the neck of lexical semantics (2009)
0.01
0.005009976 = product of:
0.020039905 = sum of:
0.020039905 = product of:
0.060119715 = sum of:
0.060119715 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060119715 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 3.2013 14:56:22
-
Monnerjahn, P.: Vorsprung ohne Technik : Übersetzen: Computer und Qualität (2000)
0.01
0.005009976 = product of:
0.020039905 = sum of:
0.020039905 = product of:
0.060119715 = sum of:
0.060119715 = weight(_text_:22 in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060119715 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- c't. 2000, H.22, S.230-231
