-
Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997)
0.05
0.05252633 = product of:
0.10505266 = sum of:
0.09169272 = weight(_text_:evolution in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09169272 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
0.013359937 = product of:
0.04007981 = sum of:
0.04007981 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04007981 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
-
Roughton, K.G.: Educating the dinosaur : the evolution of catalog management at the Iowa State University Library (1985)
0.05
0.05252633 = product of:
0.10505266 = sum of:
0.09169272 = weight(_text_:evolution in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09169272 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.013359937 = product of:
0.04007981 = sum of:
0.04007981 = weight(_text_:22 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04007981 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:11
-
Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996)
0.05
0.045960538 = product of:
0.091921076 = sum of:
0.08023113 = weight(_text_:evolution in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08023113 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
0.011689945 = product of:
0.035069834 = sum of:
0.035069834 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035069834 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
- Source
- OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
-
Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005)
0.05
0.045960538 = product of:
0.091921076 = sum of:
0.08023113 = weight(_text_:evolution in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08023113 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.011689945 = product of:
0.035069834 = sum of:
0.035069834 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035069834 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miller, T.: ¬The German Registry : the evolution of a recordkeeping model (2003)
0.04
0.040115565 = product of:
0.16046226 = sum of:
0.16046226 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16046226 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.8192806 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Weiss, A.K.: Proliferating guidelines : a history and analysis of the cataloging of electronic resources (2003)
0.04
0.039394744 = product of:
0.07878949 = sum of:
0.06876954 = weight(_text_:evolution in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06876954 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Cataloging rules for computer-based materials were first introduced in the 1970s, and since then have undergone almost continuous modification and revision. This article focuses on analysis and comparison of the various codes and guidelines for practice issued for what are now called electronic resources. Creation of new cataloging rules has been spurred by introduction of new physical carriers, the preeminence of materials accessed remotely versus those with physical carriers, the need for guidance in cataloging specific instances of computer-based materials, and the evolution of the theoretical concerns underlying the cataloging codes. Based on this history of constant change, it is easy to predict many more changes in the cataloging standards for computer-based materials in the future. However, continuous changes in the cataloging rules may have produced as much confusion as clarity for working catalogers. Caution should be exercised in the creation of new rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources, as it is possible that older rules and standards may, in fact, be readily adapted to new types of electronic resources.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gradmann, S.: Container - Content - Context : zur Evolution bibliothekarischer Metadaten von Katalogdaten zu Library Linked Data (2012)
0.03
0.03438477 = product of:
0.13753907 = sum of:
0.13753907 = weight(_text_:evolution in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13753907 = score(doc=1023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.7022405 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Guiles, K.; Ewald, R.; Tillett, B.: ¬The evolution of LCRIs : from de facto standard to? (1996)
0.03
0.032418273 = product of:
0.1296731 = sum of:
0.1296731 = weight(_text_:evolution in 8132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1296731 = score(doc=8132,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.66207874 = fieldWeight in 8132, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8132)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the evolution of Library of Congress Rule Interpretations (LCRIs) from what initially was internal documentation prepared for the use of descriptive cataloguers at the Library of Congress to their current status as a de facto national cataloguing standard and explores the role they may play in the cataloguing of the future
-
Jones, E.: ¬The evolution of the serial work, the FRBR conceptual model, and RDA (2018)
0.03
0.028653976 = product of:
0.1146159 = sum of:
0.1146159 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1146159 = score(doc=5141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.5852004 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Shuler, J.A.: Foundations of government information and bibliographic control in the United States : 1789-1900 (2003)
0.02
0.024313705 = product of:
0.09725482 = sum of:
0.09725482 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09725482 = score(doc=5636,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.49655905 = fieldWeight in 5636, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5636)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A history of classification and bibliographic control of government information is, by necessity, a tangled tale that involves the complex evolution of governments, the regularization of official publishing, along with the growth of professional librarianship. For the purposes of this article, the main argument will draw its narrative largely from the historic evolution of bibliographic control and U.S. government information during the nineteenth century. The standards and practices developed in the United States during this period remain a common framework for the discussion of any government in the world. It is further argued that these bibliographic arrangements remained in play until the 1980s when the advent of distributed computer networks began to undermine the traditions of what had largely been a print culture.
-
Shuler, J.A.: Foundations of government information and bibliographic control in the United States : 1789-1900 (2003)
0.02
0.024313705 = product of:
0.09725482 = sum of:
0.09725482 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09725482 = score(doc=5637,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.49655905 = fieldWeight in 5637, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5637)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A history of classification and bibliographic control of government information is, by necessity, a tangled tale that involves the complex evolution of governments, the regularization of official publishing, along with the growth of professional librarianship. For the purposes of this article, the main argument will draw its narrative largely from the historic evolution of bibliographic control and U.S. government information during the nineteenth century. The standards and practices developed in the United States during this period remain a common framework for the discussion of any government in the world. It is further argued that these bibliographic arrangements remained in play until the 1980s when the advent of distributed computer networks began to undermine the traditions of what had largely been a print culture.
-
Buizza, P.: Bibliographic control and authority control from Paris principles to the present (2004)
0.02
0.024313705 = product of:
0.09725482 = sum of:
0.09725482 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09725482 = score(doc=5667,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.49655905 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Forty years ago the ICCP in Paris laid the foundations of international co-operation in descriptive cataloging without explicitly speaking of authority control. Some of the factors in the evolution of authority control are the development of catalogs (from card catalog to local automation, to today's OPAC on the Web) and services provided by libraries (from individual service to local users to system networks, to the World Wide Web), as well as international agreements on cataloging (from Paris Principles to the UBC programme, to the report on Mandatory data elements for internationally shared resource authority records). This evolution progressed from the principle of uniform heading to the definition of authority entries and records, and from the responsibility of national bibliographic agencies for the form of the names of their own authors to be shared internationally to the concept of authorized equivalent heading. Some issues of the present state are the persisting differences among national rules and the aim of respecting both local culture and language and international readability.
-
Ede, S.: Fitness for purpose : the future evolution of bibliographic records and their delivery (1995)
0.02
0.02292318 = product of:
0.09169272 = sum of:
0.09169272 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09169272 = score(doc=3086,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hirons, J.; Schottlaender, B.: ¬The CONSER/PCC evolution (1997)
0.02
0.02292318 = product of:
0.09169272 = sum of:
0.09169272 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09169272 = score(doc=3727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Tillett, B.: Cataloguing rules and conceptual models for the electronic environment (1995)
0.02
0.02292318 = product of:
0.09169272 = sum of:
0.09169272 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09169272 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Offers the conceptual modelling technique as a means of analysing the future of library cataloguing with regard to cataloguing rules and MARC formats. Discusses the evolution of publishing technology and introduces the conceptual model that the IFLA is preparing in its study of the functional requirements of bibliographic records. Considers the purpose of cataloguing rules and how they have evolved in response to changes in technologies. Examines the future of cataloguing with future rules and alternative communication formats
-
Bloss, A.: Uniform titles for serials, key titles, and the 'Guidelines for authority and reference entries' : moving toward international compatibility (1997)
0.02
0.02292318 = product of:
0.09169272 = sum of:
0.09169272 = weight(_text_:evolution in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09169272 = score(doc=935,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Uniform titles for serials created under LoC Rule Interpretations, and key titles created following ISSN Network rules, serve different purposes and, since their inceptions, have been constructed differently. Presents a brief history of the evolution of these means to identify serial titles uniquely and provides a background for the effort currently underway by the IFLA to evaluate the inclusion of series authorities into the 'Guidelines for authority and reference entries'
-
Schottlaender, B.E.C.: Why metadata? Why now? Why me? (2003)
0.02
0.02292318 = product of:
0.09169272 = sum of:
0.09169272 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09169272 = score(doc=5513,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 5513, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5513)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Provides an introductory overview to the subject of metadata, which considers why metadata issues are central to discussions about the evolution of library services-particularly digital library services-and why the cataloging community is, and should be, front and center in those discussions.
-
Procházka, D.: ¬The development of uniform titles for choreographic works (2006)
0.02
0.02292318 = product of:
0.09169272 = sum of:
0.09169272 = weight(_text_:evolution in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09169272 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In 1994, the Library of Congress issued a rule interpretation to AACR2 detailing how uniform titles for choreographic works should be established. The value of the rule interpretation is discussed, and it is contrasted with prior practices. The origins of the concept behind the rule are traced back to the New York Public Library in the mid twentieth century, and its evolution into the current guidelines is delineated.
-
Chan, L.M.: ¬The principle of uniform heading in descriptive cataloging : ideal and reality (1983)
0.02
0.02292318 = product of:
0.09169272 = sum of:
0.09169272 = weight(_text_:evolution in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09169272 = score(doc=309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The principle of uniform heading underlies the rules for headings in descriptive cataloging in the American tradition. The rationale and the evolution of the principle are examined and its implications discussed in terms of the history of cataloging codes. The ideal embodied in the principle of uniform heading has been undergoing gradual modification in recent codes and considerably compromised in cataloging practice today.
-
Kuhagen, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records (1996)
0.02
0.020057783 = product of:
0.08023113 = sum of:
0.08023113 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08023113 = score(doc=5109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 5109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5109)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The USMARC Format for Authority Data is the standard for the representation and exchange of authority data in computerized records in the USA and name and series authority records are 2 categories of such authority data. Discusses the data content standards of authority work reflected in these name and series authority records in the US national authority file and examines how the standards have affected the content of the file and how the file's evolution from the LoC local authority file to a national resources authority file has affected the standards
