Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004) 0.05
    0.053637385 = product of:
      0.10727477 = sum of:
        0.09725482 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09725482 = score(doc=5005,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.49655905 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
        0.010019952 = product of:
          0.030059857 = sum of:
            0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030059857 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    After a period of experiment and evolution in the 1950s and 1960s, a fairly standard format for thesauri was established with the publication of the influential Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms (TEST) in 1967. This and other early thesauri relied primarily an the presentation of terms in alphabetical order. The value of a classified presentation was subsequently realised, and in particular the technique of facet analysis has profoundly influenced thesaurus evolution. Thesaurofacet and the Art & Architecture Thesaurus have acted as models for two distinct breeds of thesaurus using faceted displays of terms. As of the 1990s, the expansion of end-user access to vast networked resources is imposing further requirements an the style and structure of controlled vocabularies. The international standards for thesauri, first conceived in a print-based era, are badly in need of updating. Work is in hand in the UK and the USA to revise and develop standards in support of electronic thesauri.
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:46:13
  2. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.05
    0.045960538 = product of:
      0.091921076 = sum of:
        0.08023113 = weight(_text_:evolution in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08023113 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
        0.011689945 = product of:
          0.035069834 = sum of:
            0.035069834 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035069834 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  3. Krooks, D.A.; Lancaster, F.W.: ¬The evolution of guidelines for thesaurus construction (1993) 0.03
    0.032418273 = product of:
      0.1296731 = sum of:
        0.1296731 = weight(_text_:evolution in 7128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1296731 = score(doc=7128,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.66207874 = fieldWeight in 7128, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7128)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This piece of research traces the evolution of guidelines and principles for the construction of information retrieval thesauri from 1959 to 1993. We conclude that the majority of the basic problems of thesaurus construction has already been identified and solved by 1967 and that Eugene Wall, more than any other individual, has profoundly influenced the entire development in this area
  4. Youlin, Z.; Baptista Nunes, J.M.; Zhonghua, D.: Construction and evolution of a Chinese Information Science and Information Service (CIS&IS) onto-thesaurus (2014) 0.03
    0.029778086 = product of:
      0.11911234 = sum of:
        0.11911234 = weight(_text_:evolution in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11911234 = score(doc=1376,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.6081582 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri are the most important tools for information and knowledge organization, and they undergo regular improvements according to the rapid development of new requirements and affordances of emerging information techniques. This paper attempts to integrate ontology into the conceptual organization scheme of thesauri and proposes a new solution to extend the functionality of thesauri based on ontological features, which is termed here as an onto-thesaurus. In this study, a prototype system named the Chinese Information Science and Information Service onto-thesaurus system (CIS&IS), was developed to analyze ontothesaurus with the category of information science and information service in the Chinese Topic Classification Dictionary with a two-stage approach. The first stage aims to define and construct the onto-thesaurus. The second stage aims to realize the evolution function of onto-thesaurus. The main purpose of this system was to achieve the function of self-learning and auto-evolution and to enable a much more effective conceptual retrieval by the newly proposed onto-thesaurus.
  5. Curras, E.: Ontologies, taxonomy and thesauri in information organisation and retrieval (2010) 0.03
    0.028653976 = product of:
      0.1146159 = sum of:
        0.1146159 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1146159 = score(doc=3276,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.5852004 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. From classifications to ontologies Knowledge - A new concept of knowledge - Knowledge and information - Knowledge organisation - Knowledge organisation and representation - Cognitive sciences - Talent management - Learning systematisation - Historical evolution - From classification to knowledge organisation - Why ontologies exist - Ontologies - The structure of ontologies 2. Taxonomies and thesauri From ordering to taxonomy - The origins of taxonomy - Hierarchical and horizontal order - Correlation with classifications - Taxonomy in computer science - Computing taxonomy - Definitions - Virtual taxonomy, cybernetic taxonomy - Taxonomy in Information Science - Similarities between taxonomies and thesauri - ifferences between taxonomies and thesauri 3. Thesauri Terminology in classification systems - Terminological languages - Thesauri - Thesauri definitions - Conditions that a thesaurus must fulfil - Historical evolution - Classes of thesauri 4. Thesauri in (cladist) systematics Systematics - Systematics as a noun - Definitions and historic evolution over time - Differences between taxonomy and systematics - Systematics in thesaurus construction theory - Classic, numerical and cladist systematics - Classic systematics in information science - Numerical systematics in information science - Thesauri in cladist systematics - Systematics in information technology - Some examples 5. Thesauri in systems theory Historical evolution - Approach to systems - Systems theory applied to the construction of thesauri - Components - Classes of system - Peculiarities of these systems - Working methods - Systems theory applied to ontologies and taxonomies
  6. Amirhosseini, M.; Avidan, G.: ¬A dialectic perspective on the evolution of thesauri and ontologies (2021) 0.02
    0.024815073 = product of:
      0.09926029 = sum of:
        0.09926029 = weight(_text_:evolution in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09926029 = score(doc=592,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.5067985 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this article is to identify the most important factors and features in the evolution of thesauri and ontologies through a dialectic model. This model relies on a dialectic process or idea which could be discovered via a dialectic method. This method has focused on identifying the logical relationship between a beginning proposition, or an idea called a thesis, a negation of that idea called the antithesis, and the result of the conflict between the two ideas, called a synthesis. During the creation of knowl­edge organization systems (KOSs), the identification of logical relations between different ideas has been made possible through the consideration and use of the most influential methods and tools such as dictionaries, Roget's Thesaurus, thesaurus, micro-, macro- and metathesauri, ontology, lower, middle and upper level ontologies. The analysis process has adapted a historical methodology, more specifically a dialectic method and documentary method as the reasoning process. This supports our arguments and synthesizes a method for the analysis of research results. Confirmed by the research results, the principle of unity has shown to be the most important factor in the development and evolution of the structure of knowl­edge organization systems and their types. There are various types of unity when considering the analysis of logical relations. These include the principle of unity of alphabetical order, unity of science, semantic unity, structural unity and conceptual unity. The results have clearly demonstrated a movement from plurality to unity in the assembling of the complex structure of knowl­edge organization systems to increase information and knowl­edge storage and retrieval performance.
  7. Martínez-González, M.M.; Alvite-Díez, M.L.: Thesauri and Semantic Web : discussion of the evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web (2019) 0.02
    0.020261422 = product of:
      0.08104569 = sum of:
        0.08104569 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08104569 = score(doc=5997,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.41379923 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri are Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS), that arise from the consensus of wide communities. They have been in use for many years and are regularly updated. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals for indexing and searching, today there is a demand for conceptual vocabularies that enable inferencing by machines. The development of the Semantic Web has brought a new opportunity for thesauri, but thesauri also face the challenge of proving that they add value to it. The evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web is examined. Elements and structures in the thesaurus standard, ISO 25964, and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System), the Semantic Web standard for representing KOS, are reviewed and compared. Moreover, the integrity rules of thesauri are contrasted with the axioms of SKOS. How SKOS has been applied to represent some real thesauri is taken into account. Three thesauri are chosen for this aim: AGROVOC, EuroVoc and the UNESCO Thesaurus. Based on the results of this comparison and analysis, the benefits that Semantic Web technologies offer to thesauri, how thesauri can contribute to the Semantic Web, and the challenges that would help to improve their integration with the Semantic Web are discussed.
  8. Lee, W.G.; Ishikawa, Y.; Yamagishi, T.; Nishioka, A.; Hatada, K.; Ohbo, N.; Fujiwara, S.: ¬A dynamic thesaurus for intelligent access to research databases (1989) 0.02
    0.020057783 = product of:
      0.08023113 = sum of:
        0.08023113 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08023113 = score(doc=3556,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information, knowledge, evolution. Proceedings of the 44th FID Congress, Helsinki, 28.8.-1.9.1988. Ed. by Sinikka Koshiala and Ritva Launo
  9. Baca, M.: Fear of authority? : Authority control and thesaurus building for art and material culture information (2004) 0.02
    0.020057783 = product of:
      0.08023113 = sum of:
        0.08023113 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08023113 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Until the 1980s, concepts like authority control, controlled vocabularies, and metadata and schemas were all but unknown in the world of art and material culture information. This paper traces the evolution and current status of tools and resources for authority control of art information, and gives examples of how the lack of authority control can impede end-user access. Collection-specific thesauri and subject indexes, and vocabulary-assisted searching and query expansion are also discussed.
  10. Baca, M.; Gill, M.: Encoding multilingual knowledge systems in the digital age : the Getty vocabularies (2015) 0.02
    0.017192384 = product of:
      0.06876954 = sum of:
        0.06876954 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06876954 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper gives an overview of the history, development, and structure of the electronic thesauri produced and maintained by the Getty Research Institute (GRI). We describe the evolution of the Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT®), the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN®), and the Union List of Artist Names (ULAN®) as multilingual, cross-cultural knowledge organization systems (KOS); the factors that make them unique; and their potential, when expressed as Linked Open Data (LOD) to play a key role in the Semantic Web.
  11. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Origins and trajectory of the long thesaurus debate (2016) 0.01
    0.014326988 = product of:
      0.05730795 = sum of:
        0.05730795 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05730795 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The information retrieval thesaurus emerged in the 1950s, settled down to a more-or-less standard format in the 1970s and has continued to evolve marginally since then. Throughout its whole lifetime, doubts have been expressed about its efficacy with emphasis latterly on cost-effectiveness. Prolonged testing of different styles of index language in the 1970s failed to settle the doubts. The arena occupied by the debate has moved from small isolated databases in the post-war era to diverse situations nowadays with the whole Internet at one extreme and small in-house collections at the other. Sophisticated statistical techniques now dominate the retrieval landscape on the Internet but leave opportunities for the thesaurus and other knowledge organization techniques in niches such as image libraries and corporate intranets. The promise of an ontology-driven semantic web with linked data resources opens another opportunity. Thus much scope remains for research to establish the usefulness of the thesaurus in these places and to inspire its continuing evolution.
  12. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.01
    0.0058449726 = product of:
      0.02337989 = sum of:
        0.02337989 = product of:
          0.07013967 = sum of:
            0.07013967 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07013967 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
  13. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.01
    0.005009976 = product of:
      0.020039905 = sum of:
        0.020039905 = product of:
          0.060119715 = sum of:
            0.060119715 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060119715 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  14. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01
    0.005009976 = product of:
      0.020039905 = sum of:
        0.020039905 = product of:
          0.060119715 = sum of:
            0.060119715 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060119715 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  15. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01
    0.005009976 = product of:
      0.020039905 = sum of:
        0.020039905 = product of:
          0.060119715 = sum of:
            0.060119715 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060119715 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  16. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.01
    0.005009976 = product of:
      0.020039905 = sum of:
        0.020039905 = product of:
          0.060119715 = sum of:
            0.060119715 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060119715 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  17. Riege, U.: Thesaurus und Klassifikation Sozialwissenschaften : Entwicklung der elektronischen Versionen (1998) 0.00
    0.0041749803 = product of:
      0.016699921 = sum of:
        0.016699921 = product of:
          0.050099764 = sum of:
            0.050099764 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050099764 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  18. Alkämper, H.: ¬Die Neugestaltung des Parlamentsthesaurus PARTHES (1998) 0.00
    0.0041749803 = product of:
      0.016699921 = sum of:
        0.016699921 = product of:
          0.050099764 = sum of:
            0.050099764 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050099764 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  19. Schenkel, M.: Vom Leitkartenthesaurus zum Online-Bibliotheksthesaurus : Die Revision des Dokumentationssystems der Bibliothek des Deutschen Bundestages (1949-1998) (1998) 0.00
    0.0041749803 = product of:
      0.016699921 = sum of:
        0.016699921 = product of:
          0.050099764 = sum of:
            0.050099764 = weight(_text_:22 in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050099764 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  20. Velasco, M.: Algoritmo de filtrado multitermino para la obtencion de relaciones jerarquicas en la construction automatica de un tesauro de descriptores (1999) 0.00
    0.0041749803 = product of:
      0.016699921 = sum of:
        0.016699921 = product of:
          0.050099764 = sum of:
            0.050099764 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050099764 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.1, S.34-49

Years

Languages

  • e 29
  • d 8
  • f 4
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 35
  • el 3
  • m 3
  • n 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…