Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Grunder, R.: Qualitätskriterien für Datenbanken : Grundsätzliche Überlegungen und Untersuchung ausgewählter Aspekte am Beispiel bibliographischer Online-Datenbanken (1995) 0.04
    0.0414879 = product of:
      0.12446369 = sum of:
        0.12446369 = product of:
          0.24892738 = sum of:
            0.24892738 = weight(_text_:datenbanken in 7107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24892738 = score(doc=7107,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23111258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9238067 = idf(docFreq=873, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                1.0770828 = fieldWeight in 7107, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.9238067 = idf(docFreq=873, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  2. Borlund, P.: Evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems (2000) 0.02
    0.023707367 = product of:
      0.0711221 = sum of:
        0.0711221 = product of:
          0.1422442 = sum of:
            0.1422442 = weight(_text_:datenbanken in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1422442 = score(doc=2556,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23111258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9238067 = idf(docFreq=873, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.61547583 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.9238067 = idf(docFreq=873, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    BK
    54.64 / Datenbanken
    Classification
    54.64 / Datenbanken
  3. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.01
    0.014838651 = product of:
      0.044515952 = sum of:
        0.044515952 = product of:
          0.089031905 = sum of:
            0.089031905 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089031905 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  4. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.01
    0.014838651 = product of:
      0.044515952 = sum of:
        0.044515952 = product of:
          0.089031905 = sum of:
            0.089031905 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089031905 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  5. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.01
    0.014838651 = product of:
      0.044515952 = sum of:
        0.044515952 = product of:
          0.089031905 = sum of:
            0.089031905 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089031905 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  6. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.01
    0.014838651 = product of:
      0.044515952 = sum of:
        0.044515952 = product of:
          0.089031905 = sum of:
            0.089031905 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089031905 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  7. Kaltenborn, K.-F.: Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Datenbank Medline : T.1: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Nutzungscharakteristika, Bewertung der Rechercheergebnisse und künftige Informationsgewinnung; T.2: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Recherchequalität und Nutzer-Computer/Datenbank-Interaktion (1991) 0.01
    0.012572731 = product of:
      0.03771819 = sum of:
        0.03771819 = product of:
          0.07543638 = sum of:
            0.07543638 = weight(_text_:datenbanken in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07543638 = score(doc=5105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23111258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9238067 = idf(docFreq=873, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.32640535 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.9238067 = idf(docFreq=873, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Einführung von CD-ROM Datenbanken als neue Informationstechnologie hat die Formen der Informationsgewinnung in bestimmten wissenschaftlichen Fachgebieten grundlegend geändert. Der Beitrag berichtet über Ergebnisse wissenschaftlicher Begleitforschung bei Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Version der Datenbank MEDLINE. Hierzu wurden drei verschiedene Erhebungen durchgeführt. Hiernach ist die überwiegende Zahl der Endnutzer (89,3%) mit dem jeweiligen Rechercheresultat zufrieden, wobei Benutzer mit geringer Rechercheerfahrung eine höhere Zufriedenheitsrate erreichen als Benutzer mit umfangreicheren Recherchekenntnissen. Die Gründe zur Nutzung von CD-ROM-Systemen resultieren voriwegend aus der klinischen Alltagsroutine oder täglichen Forschungspraxis, während vermittelte Online-Literatursuchen tendenziell häufiger im Zusammenhang mit einmaligen Ereignissen der wissenschaftlichen Aus- und Weiterbildung stehen. Die selbständige CD-ROM Literaturrecherche stellt für die befragten Ärzte und Wissenschaftler die bevorzugte Methode der Informationsgewinnung dar. Die analysierten Endnutzerrecherchen weisen allerdings Fehler und Defizite hinsichtlich einer optimalen Suchstrategie auf, die zu unbemerktn Informationsverlusten und zu Fehlbeurteilungen des wissenschaftlichen Kenntnisstandes führen
  8. Mielke, B.: Wider einige gängige Ansichten zur juristischen Informationserschließung (2002) 0.01
    0.012572731 = product of:
      0.03771819 = sum of:
        0.03771819 = product of:
          0.07543638 = sum of:
            0.07543638 = weight(_text_:datenbanken in 2145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07543638 = score(doc=2145,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23111258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9238067 = idf(docFreq=873, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.32640535 = fieldWeight in 2145, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.9238067 = idf(docFreq=873, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2145)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von einer Betrachtung in der Rechtsinformatik geläufiger Annahmen zur juristischen Informationserschließung beschreibt der Beitrag wesentliche Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie der Retrievaleffektivität von Re-cherchen in juristischen Datenbanken. Dabei steht die Frage nach der Notwendigkeit einer intellektuellen Erschließung einerseits, der Effektivität der sogenannten Stichwortsuche andererseits im Mittelpunkt. Die Ergebnisse der Studie, bei der auch ein Vergleich zwischen einem Informationssystem auf der Basis eines Booleschen Retrievalmodells mit einem System auf der Basis statistischer Verfahren vorgenommen wurde, legen den Schluss nahe, dass in der rechtsinformatischen Fachliteratur analytisch begründete Annahmen wie die Gefahr zu großer Antwortmengen bei der Stichwortsuche empirisch nicht zu belegen sind. Auch zeigt sich keine Überlegenheit intellektueller Erschließungsverfahren (Beschlagwortung) gegenüber der automatischen Indexierung, im Gegenteil führt der Einsatz eines statistischen Verfahrens bei identischer Dokumentkollektion zu einer höheren Wiedergewinnungsrate (recall).
  9. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01
    0.010599038 = product of:
      0.03179711 = sum of:
        0.03179711 = product of:
          0.06359422 = sum of:
            0.06359422 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06359422 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  10. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.01
    0.010599038 = product of:
      0.03179711 = sum of:
        0.03179711 = product of:
          0.06359422 = sum of:
            0.06359422 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06359422 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  11. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.01
    0.010599038 = product of:
      0.03179711 = sum of:
        0.03179711 = product of:
          0.06359422 = sum of:
            0.06359422 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06359422 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  12. Park, S.: Usability, user preferences, effectiveness, and user behaviors when searching individual and integrated full-text databases : implications for digital libraries (2000) 0.01
    0.0104772765 = product of:
      0.031431828 = sum of:
        0.031431828 = product of:
          0.062863655 = sum of:
            0.062863655 = weight(_text_:datenbanken in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062863655 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23111258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9238067 = idf(docFreq=873, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.27200446 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.9238067 = idf(docFreq=873, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Verteilte bibliographische Datenbanken
  13. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01
    0.008479229 = product of:
      0.025437687 = sum of:
        0.025437687 = product of:
          0.050875373 = sum of:
            0.050875373 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050875373 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  14. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01
    0.008479229 = product of:
      0.025437687 = sum of:
        0.025437687 = product of:
          0.050875373 = sum of:
            0.050875373 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050875373 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  15. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.01
    0.008479229 = product of:
      0.025437687 = sum of:
        0.025437687 = product of:
          0.050875373 = sum of:
            0.050875373 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050875373 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  16. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.01
    0.008479229 = product of:
      0.025437687 = sum of:
        0.025437687 = product of:
          0.050875373 = sum of:
            0.050875373 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050875373 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
  17. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.01
    0.008479229 = product of:
      0.025437687 = sum of:
        0.025437687 = product of:
          0.050875373 = sum of:
            0.050875373 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050875373 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  18. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01
    0.008479229 = product of:
      0.025437687 = sum of:
        0.025437687 = product of:
          0.050875373 = sum of:
            0.050875373 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050875373 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  19. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.01
    0.008479229 = product of:
      0.025437687 = sum of:
        0.025437687 = product of:
          0.050875373 = sum of:
            0.050875373 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050875373 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
  20. ¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003) 0.01
    0.008479229 = product of:
      0.025437687 = sum of:
        0.025437687 = product of:
          0.050875373 = sum of:
            0.050875373 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050875373 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16436812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046937786 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.

Languages

  • e 33
  • d 7
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 35
  • m 4
  • s 4
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…