Search (119 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.07 
    0.06915097 = product of:
  0.27660388 = sum of:
    0.27660388 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27660388 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36912143 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043538682 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  2. Bornmann, L.: Lässt sich die Qualität von Forschung messen? (2013) 0.01 
    0.011880444 = product of:
  0.047521777 = sum of:
    0.047521777 = product of:
      0.095043555 = sum of:
        0.095043555 = weight(_text_:sehen in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095043555 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24984509 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7384624 = idf(docFreq=386, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.38040993 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7384624 = idf(docFreq=386, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Grundsätzlich können wir bei Bewertungen in der Wissenschaft zwischen einer 'qualitative' Form, der Bewertung einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit (z. B. eines Manuskripts oder Forschungsantrags) durch kompetente Peers, und einer 'quantitative' Form, der Bewertung von wissenschaftlicher Arbeit anhand bibliometrischer Indikatoren unterscheiden. Beide Formen der Bewertung sind nicht unumstritten. Die Kritiker des Peer Review sehen vor allem zwei Schwächen des Verfahrens: (1) Verschiedene Gutachter würden kaum in der Bewertung ein und derselben wissenschaftlichen Arbeit übereinstimmen. (2) Gutachterliche Empfehlungen würden systematische Urteilsverzerrungen aufweisen. Gegen die Verwendung von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für die Qualität einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit wird seit Jahren eine Vielzahl von Bedenken geäußert. Zitierhäufigkeiten seien keine 'objektiven' Messungen von wissenschaftlicher Qualität, sondern ein kritisierbares Messkonstrukt. So wird unter anderem kritisiert, dass wissenschaftliche Qualität ein komplexes Phänomen darstelle, das nicht auf einer eindimensionalen Skala (d. h. anhand von Zitierhäufigkeiten) gemessen werden könne. Es werden empirische Ergebnisse zur Reliabilität und Fairness des Peer Review Verfahrens sowie Forschungsergebnisse zur Güte von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für wissenschaftliche Qualität vorgestellt.
  3. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.01 
    0.011797781 = product of:
  0.047191124 = sum of:
    0.047191124 = product of:
      0.09438225 = sum of:
        0.09438225 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09438225 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  4. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.011797781 = product of:
  0.047191124 = sum of:
    0.047191124 = product of:
      0.09438225 = sum of:
        0.09438225 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09438225 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  5. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.01 
    0.011797781 = product of:
  0.047191124 = sum of:
    0.047191124 = product of:
      0.09438225 = sum of:
        0.09438225 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09438225 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  6. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.01 
    0.010427863 = product of:
  0.041711453 = sum of:
    0.041711453 = product of:
      0.08342291 = sum of:
        0.08342291 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08342291 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  7. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01 
    0.010427863 = product of:
  0.041711453 = sum of:
    0.041711453 = product of:
      0.08342291 = sum of:
        0.08342291 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08342291 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  8. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.01 
    0.010323058 = product of:
  0.04129223 = sum of:
    0.04129223 = product of:
      0.08258446 = sum of:
        0.08258446 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08258446 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  9. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.01 
    0.010323058 = product of:
  0.04129223 = sum of:
    0.04129223 = product of:
      0.08258446 = sum of:
        0.08258446 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08258446 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.01 
    0.010323058 = product of:
  0.04129223 = sum of:
    0.04129223 = product of:
      0.08258446 = sum of:
        0.08258446 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08258446 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  11. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.01 
    0.008848336 = product of:
  0.035393342 = sum of:
    0.035393342 = product of:
      0.070786685 = sum of:
        0.070786685 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070786685 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  12. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.01 
    0.008848336 = product of:
  0.035393342 = sum of:
    0.035393342 = product of:
      0.070786685 = sum of:
        0.070786685 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070786685 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  13. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01 
    0.006256718 = product of:
  0.025026873 = sum of:
    0.025026873 = product of:
      0.050053746 = sum of:
        0.050053746 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050053746 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  14. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.006256718 = product of:
  0.025026873 = sum of:
    0.025026873 = product of:
      0.050053746 = sum of:
        0.050053746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050053746 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  15. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01 
    0.0058988906 = product of:
  0.023595562 = sum of:
    0.023595562 = product of:
      0.047191124 = sum of:
        0.047191124 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047191124 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  16. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01 
    0.0058988906 = product of:
  0.023595562 = sum of:
    0.023595562 = product of:
      0.047191124 = sum of:
        0.047191124 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047191124 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  17. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01 
    0.0058988906 = product of:
  0.023595562 = sum of:
    0.023595562 = product of:
      0.047191124 = sum of:
        0.047191124 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047191124 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  18. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01 
    0.0058988906 = product of:
  0.023595562 = sum of:
    0.023595562 = product of:
      0.047191124 = sum of:
        0.047191124 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047191124 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  19. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01 
    0.0058988906 = product of:
  0.023595562 = sum of:
    0.023595562 = product of:
      0.047191124 = sum of:
        0.047191124 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047191124 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  20. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01 
    0.0058988906 = product of:
  0.023595562 = sum of:
    0.023595562 = product of:
      0.047191124 = sum of:
        0.047191124 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047191124 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15246505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043538682 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 108
  • d 10
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 117
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications