Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Stock, W.G.: Publikation und Zitat : Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung (2001) 0.03 
    0.028535187 = product of:
  0.11414075 = sum of:
    0.11414075 = sum of:
      0.09037992 = weight(_text_:faktoren in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09037992 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2384704 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
            0.034759384 = queryNorm
          0.3789985 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
      0.023760827 = weight(_text_:29 in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023760827 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.034759384 = queryNorm
          0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Die empirische Wissenschaftsforschung arbeitet bei den Indikatoren wissenschaftlicher Leistung und wissenschaftlicher Wirkung mit Publikations- und Zitationsraten. Die vorliegende Arbeit befaßt sich mit dabei auftretenden methodischen Problemen. Was ist überhaupt eine Publikation? Was heißt Zitation? Zentral ist auch die Zählbasis, d.h. die Einheitenbildung: Was ist 1 Publikation? und: Was ist 1 Zitation? Bei Printpublikationen gibt es eine Reihe von beachtenswerten Faktoren (u.a. Mehrautorenwerke, Gewichtungsfaktoren wie den Impact Factor, Dokumenttypen). Bei elektronischen Publikationen im Internet mit ihrem dynamischen Charakter ist die Einheitenbildung noch weitaus problematischer. Zitationen, verstanden als zitierte Publikationen, werfen alle methodischen Probleme der Publikationseinheiten auf, hinzu kommen weitere, spezifische Probleme. Lösungsmöglichkeiten im syntaktischen Bereich (Relativierung auf Textseiten oder Zeichen) ändern am grundlegenden Problem nur wenig, Lösungsversuche im semantischen Bereich (etwa im Rahmen der semantischen Informationstheorie) sind im Rahmen der Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen nicht durchführbar und verweisen sowohl auf themenanalytische Methoden als auch auf die Wissenschaftstheorie. Mit diesem Working Paper wollen wir vor allem auf offene Probleme hinweisen; "endgültige" Lösungen wird der Leser nicht finden, wohl aber Lösungsvorschläge, die meist durchaus noch diskussionswürdig sind. In der Informationswissenschaft wie in der Wissenschaftsforschung sind wir bisher viel zu sicher davon ausgegangen, daß wir wissen, was Publikationen und Zitationen sind
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.29
  2. Czepel, R.: ¬Die Geographie der wissenschaftlichen Zitierung (2003) 0.01 
    0.009037992 = product of:
  0.036151968 = sum of:
    0.036151968 = product of:
      0.072303936 = sum of:
        0.072303936 = weight(_text_:faktoren in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072303936 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2384704 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.30319878 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Ein britischer Forscher hat sich die Mühe gemacht, die geografischen Muster der Zitierungen von 1981 bis zur Gegenwart freizulegen. Das Ergebnis: Die publizistische Wahrnehmung ist in der Wissenschaft äußerst ungleich verteilt. Die USA dominieren mit großem Abstand vor dem Rest der WeIt. Und auch dort konzentrieren sich die Verweise auf einige wenige Ballungsräume der Forschung. Michael Batty vom Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis in London bediente sich für seine Analyse der Datenbank "ISIHighlyCited.com" (http: //www.isihighlycited.com/), in der Forscher aus verschiedenen Disziplinen aufgelistet werden, die die weltweit meisten Zitate auf sich gezogen haben. In diesen Ranglisten nehmen die akademischen Edelschmieden aus den USA etwa jene Rolle ein, die Österreichische Athleten im Alpinschisport besetzen. Einzig der Forschungsraum London kann mit der Konkurrenz aus Übersee halbwegs mithalten. Der Artikel "Citation Geography: It's About Location" von Michael Batty erschien im Magazin "The Scientist" (Band 17, Heft 16/10, Ausgabe vom 25.8.03; http://www.thescientist.com/yr2003/aug/opinion 030825.html). Die Zeitschrift ist nach individueller Registrierung frei zugänglich. Der Homepage des Autors http: //www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/citations/ können weitere Details entnommen werden. Ob die Anzahl derZitate auch etwas über die wissenschaftliche Qualität aussagt, ist genau so Gegenstand von Diskussionen, wie dies etwa bei den "Impact-Faktoren" von Journalen der Fall ist (vgl. "Kann wissenschaftliche Qualität gemessen werden?", http://science.orf.at/science/news/58648). Ganz wertfrei kann man die ISI-Daten jedenfalls dazu verwenden, um herauszufinden, in welchem Land, in welcher Stadt und in welcher Institution die meist zitierten Forscher dieses Erdballs sitzen. Das Ergebnis dieser von Michael Batty erstellten "Geografie derwissenschaftlichen Zitierung" ist eindeutig: Einige Wenige ziehen den Großteil der publizistischen Aufmerksamkeit auf sich - und lassen für den Rest nur wenig über. Diese Aussage gilt gleichermaßen für Ranglisten von Städten, Institutionen und Ländern. Und: In allen drei Fällen kommen die Spitzereiter aus dem US-amerikanischen Raum.
  3. Williams, R.M.: ISI search network research front specialities (1983) 0.01 
    0.008316289 = product of:
  0.033265155 = sum of:
    0.033265155 = product of:
      0.06653031 = sum of:
        0.06653031 = weight(_text_:29 in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06653031 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  4. Remler, A.: Lässt sich wissenschaftliche Leistung messen? : Wer zitiert wird, liegt vorne - in den USA berechnet man Forschungsleistung nach einem Zitat-Index (2000) 0.01 
    0.008316289 = product of:
  0.033265155 = sum of:
    0.033265155 = product of:
      0.06653031 = sum of:
        0.06653031 = weight(_text_:29 in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06653031 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30.10.2000 17:47:29
  5. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.006279222 = product of:
  0.025116889 = sum of:
    0.025116889 = product of:
      0.075350665 = sum of:
        0.075350665 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075350665 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12172144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  6. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.01 
    0.006279222 = product of:
  0.025116889 = sum of:
    0.025116889 = product of:
      0.075350665 = sum of:
        0.075350665 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075350665 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12172144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  7. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998) 0.01 
    0.005940207 = product of:
  0.023760827 = sum of:
    0.023760827 = product of:
      0.047521655 = sum of:
        0.047521655 = weight(_text_:29 in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047521655 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:19:32
  8. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01 
    0.005550101 = product of:
  0.022200404 = sum of:
    0.022200404 = product of:
      0.06660121 = sum of:
        0.06660121 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06660121 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12172144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  9. Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993) 0.00 
    0.004752165 = product of:
  0.01900866 = sum of:
    0.01900866 = product of:
      0.03801732 = sum of:
        0.03801732 = weight(_text_:29 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801732 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
  10. Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006) 0.00 
    0.004752165 = product of:
  0.01900866 = sum of:
    0.01900866 = product of:
      0.03801732 = sum of:
        0.03801732 = weight(_text_:29 in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801732 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    18. 8.2006 14:29:40
  11. Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.00 
    0.004752165 = product of:
  0.01900866 = sum of:
    0.01900866 = product of:
      0.03801732 = sum of:
        0.03801732 = weight(_text_:29 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801732 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:52:23
  12. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.00 
    0.004752165 = product of:
  0.01900866 = sum of:
    0.01900866 = product of:
      0.03801732 = sum of:
        0.03801732 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801732 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    27.12.2007 17:16:29
  13. East, J.W.: Citations to conference papers and the implications for cataloging (1985) 0.00 
    0.0041581444 = product of:
  0.016632577 = sum of:
    0.016632577 = product of:
      0.033265155 = sum of:
        0.033265155 = weight(_text_:29 in 7928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033265155 = score(doc=7928,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 7928, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7928)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 29(1985), S.189-194
  14. Morris, S.A.; Yen, G.; Wu, Z.; Asnake, B.: Time line visualization of research fronts (2003) 0.00 
    0.0041581444 = product of:
  0.016632577 = sum of:
    0.016632577 = product of:
      0.033265155 = sum of:
        0.033265155 = weight(_text_:29 in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033265155 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:51:59
  15. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.00 
    0.003924514 = product of:
  0.015698057 = sum of:
    0.015698057 = product of:
      0.047094166 = sum of:
        0.047094166 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047094166 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12172144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  16. Chen, C.; Paul, R.J.; O'Keefe, B.: Fitting the Jigsaw of citation : information visualization in domain analysis (2001) 0.00 
    0.003564124 = product of:
  0.014256496 = sum of:
    0.014256496 = product of:
      0.028512992 = sum of:
        0.028512992 = weight(_text_:29 in 5766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028512992 = score(doc=5766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:00:53
  17. Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001) 0.00 
    0.003564124 = product of:
  0.014256496 = sum of:
    0.014256496 = product of:
      0.028512992 = sum of:
        0.028512992 = weight(_text_:29 in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028512992 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:01:09
  18. Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.: Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods (2005) 0.00 
    0.003564124 = product of:
  0.014256496 = sum of:
    0.014256496 = product of:
      0.028512992 = sum of:
        0.028512992 = weight(_text_:29 in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028512992 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 10:29:08
  19. Aksnes, D.W.: Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution (2006) 0.00 
    0.003564124 = product of:
  0.014256496 = sum of:
    0.014256496 = product of:
      0.028512992 = sum of:
        0.028512992 = weight(_text_:29 in 4925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028512992 = score(doc=4925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    11. 2.2006 17:52:29
  20. Gorraiz, J.: "Web of Science" versus "Scopus" oder das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliotheken (2006) 0.00 
    0.003564124 = product of:
  0.014256496 = sum of:
    0.014256496 = product of:
      0.028512992 = sum of:
        0.028512992 = weight(_text_:29 in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028512992 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    4. 6.2006 17:36:29

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 34
  • d 9

Types

  • a 39
  • el 4
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications